Bernd Khalil wrote:
Blandon Ray wrote:
Tried it in Netscape 4.7, and the 8 ball said yes. In IE 5.5 it said
it is certain. (okay, it's 1 for 2.) If you try it in Mozilla 0.9.2,
you get a message that says your browser is busted if you just see
this text.
I think it works, but
Hi
I have been trying to figure this out for a while, why does mozilla gunzip
my .gz files on the fly while leaving the .gz extension in place. This can
be very annoying because all my .gz file (even though they appear gzipped
by extension) are not gzippped. The behavoir has been same for a while
Carlfish wrote:
On Thu, 26 Jul 2001 18:47:19 -0400, greg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
somehow managed to type:
Is this sounding ridiculous to anybody else? B*tching here won't make a
difference so stop it. If it's still a problem close to release time,
they can just ship it with a big yellow
FT Rathore wrote:
I have been trying to figure this out for a while, why does mozilla gunzip
my .gz files on the fly while leaving the .gz extension in place. This can
be very annoying because all my .gz file (even though they appear gzipped
by extension) are not gzippped. The behavoir has
On Fri, 27 Jul 2001 11:32:11 -0600, Jerry Baker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
somehow managed to type:
There are many with differing methods of keeping track of visitors. Even
if all of these different sites, and all of the different stats
applications they were running, were underestimating
Blandon Ray [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
I apologize in advance if this is too far OT:
I am not a Web developer, so hopefully someone more knowledgeable
can tell me what this page is doing that disagrees with Mozilla.
Haven't heard anything about this for a while. Are they still
considering using Gecko as their base in the future, or have they gone
the way of the impatient?
--
Albert
We must have a better word than 'prefabricated'. Why not 'ready-made'?
--Winston Churchill
If sending email, remove the
I am running on a Win98 machine. How can I prevent
debugging information from being sent to that DOS window
that opens when Mozilla does.
Also, will turning off debugging prevent assertion failures
that crash the browser (for example, that annoying assertion
failure that occurs whenever I
Carlfish wrote:
-snip--
The vast majority of those people still using Navigator 4.x are those who:
1. Received it as part of their ISP package, use it because it was what
was given to them, and either do not know how to, or do not know they
can change.
2. Use it because of
Jerry Baker wrote:
Carlfish wrote:
3. Use it because they really, really prefer NN over Internet Explorer,
despite IE5+ being more stable, and rendering modern HTML better.
It is these users that intrigue me. It would seem to me, on the surface
anyway, that someone who prefered
Which build are you using. I havn't see the ol' DOS window in a long
time.
D. Alvarado wrote:
I am running on a Win98 machine. How can I prevent
debugging information from being sent to that DOS window
that opens when Mozilla does.
Also, will turning off debugging prevent assertion
How do the cookie files work in Mozilla? I have set the browser to
accept cookies. I have saved the cookies I want and write locked the
file but cookies still seem to be getting in to the file. Is there a
difference in the way cookies work in Moz?
Jerry Baker wrote:
Carlfish wrote:
3. Use it because they really, really prefer NN over Internet Explorer,
despite IE5+ being more stable, and rendering modern HTML better.
It is these users that intrigue me. It would seem to me, on the surface
anyway, that someone who prefered to
Jerry Baker wrote:
I see that Mozilla and NN6 usage is still hovering somehwere just under
0.5%. Is there anyone investigating why?
Hmmm, that does seem awfully high. Perhaps there are more techincally
literate psychos running around than any of us realize.
As for investigating why this
On Thu, 26 Jul 2001 12:16:28 -0600, Jerry Baker
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I see that Mozilla and NN6 usage is still hovering somehwere just under
0.5%. Is there anyone investigating why?
--
Jerry Baker
I use NN4.77 at home and work (a UK FE College). I haven't yet
transferred to Moz at home,
On 27 Jul 2001 18:25:25 GMT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Carlfish) wrote:
3. Use it because they really, really prefer NN over Internet Explorer,
despite IE5+ being more stable, and rendering modern HTML bette
Please! Thats a matter of your opinion! You mean IE renders
frontpage web sites better?
I downloaded the latest version of Mozilla (0.9.2) via CVS
about a week ago, built it, and ran
/dist/win32_d.obj/bin/mozilla.exe. The debugging window is
not actually DOS, I suppose. It's just some window that
prints out debugging output such as Chrome registering ...
and Document
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How do the cookie files work in Mozilla? I have set the browser to
accept cookies. I have saved the cookies I want and write locked the
file but cookies still seem to be getting in to the file. Is there a
difference in the way cookies work in Moz?
FYI, you can
On Fri, 27 Jul 2001 23:52:56 GMT, Vadir Puovkin
VadirPuovkin[EMAIL PROTECTED] typed:
On 27 Jul 2001 18:25:25 GMT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Carlfish) wrote:
3. Use it because they really, really prefer NN over Internet Explorer,
despite IE5+ being more stable, and rendering modern HTML bette
Jerry Baker wrote:
Carlfish wrote:
3. Use it because they really, really prefer NN over Internet Explorer,
despite IE5+ being more stable, and rendering modern HTML better.
It is these users that intrigue me. It would seem to me, on the surface
anyway, that someone who prefered to be a
N. Marshall wrote:
Jerry Baker wrote:
Carlfish wrote:
3. Use it because they really, really prefer NN over Internet Explorer,
despite IE5+ being more stable, and rendering modern HTML better.
It is these users that intrigue me. It would seem to me, on the surface
anyway, that someone who
21 matches
Mail list logo
