If we get to the wonderful position of having no crash bugs, we do not
then land a whole slew of new features, however voted for they are. We
keep the stability and work towards shipping.
What about after shipping? I'm not necessarily only talking pre-1.0
release here. Will votes
**
This is not spam...you are on a Uniplex customer or VAR mailing list. If you feel you
are on this list in error, Unsubscribe information is at the bottom of this message.
**
Get Paid to offer Free Mail to your site visitors.
New ASP service lets you offer free mail accounts to your
Jerry Baker wrote:
Jason Bassford wrote:
1. Okay, if all development is forced to be only on crashers and
dataloss bugs I can see how people will not be able to work on
anything else until there are actually 0 of these. But, immediately
after that, since there is nothing else,
Anyone, Maybe this is addressed some place but I couldn't find it.
On Mozilla 0.9.2, I go through the bookmark fix of customizing the
sidebar to remove the bookmarks, quit mozilla, fire it back up again,
and then then try to customize the sidebar again by adding the bookmarks
tab back in.
Why have moz.org removed the installer.exe to install via the net!. ?
Incredible stupid now I have to download this *.zip file witch is a
hassel to get working.
Please get back installer.exe!!!.
And it came to pass that Henning Schnoor wrote:
Hi,
when creating a profile in some specific folder, Mozilla
always adds a name which seems to be made up of random
characters, like s76fhsgdf.so or something.
Why does it do this, and how can I prevent it?
This is very annoying,
I am posting in the hope that someone else here has ran into this
issue. I am attempting to install Netscape 6.1 PR1 on RedHat 7.0
kernel 2.4.5. I have tried installing as root in /usr/local/netscape
then running as root. I have tried installing as user in home
directory and running as user.
Justin E. Harlow III wrote:
Crash Course wrote:
snip
I installed the newest version of mozilla an our or so ago. Everything
seemed to run fine until I tried to run it as myself instead of as root
(I installed it as root of course though).
snip
I am running Mandrak 8.0 on a
Could someone tell me how to write the following so in NS 4X, Mozilla and IE
you will see a open box, NS and mozilla are showing it as collapsed until
someting is added to it.
select name=choiceBox size=13 multiple style=Width: 314;
onchange=removeMe();
/select
I've tried changing the width
The installer problem was human error and has been fixed.
Thanks,
-j
Henning Schnoor wrote:
Hi,
as I'm sure everyone already noticed, there is no full installer for
Mozilla 0.9.3 for Windows. Both files in the ftp directory are just the
small net-installer.
I tried out Mozilla
Colin Winfrey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
U.S. Govt., 19th Century microbiological LUDDITES!!
http://www.google.com/search?q=microbiological+luddites
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hans Hogrefe, [EMAIL PROTECTED],
director for the Congressional Human
Steve wrote:
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED]">[EMAIL PROTECTED], Jay Garcia[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
AFAIK Mozilla will not be a 'comercial browser' but rather a vehicle forthe Gecko Engine development. You should be asking this same question ofNetscape 6
That's too bad. Doing
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], N. Marshall
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
The main reasons that she won't move to Mozilla are:
1. There is no way to file a bookmark straight into the correct folder
like you can in NS4.x.
F9 to open the sidebar, drag the link into the correct folder. It's not
the
Hi,
I just downloaded the latest milestone (0.9.3) and to my horror, found
out that several important things are broken:
1. Dropdown lists (just look at any bug, or Netscape site) show the
dropdown items as an always visible vertical list (thus taking up a lot
of screen space).
2. Crash on
Peter Lairo wrote:
Have you also noticed the dropdown list bug that makes this milestone
completely unusable?
I do not see this problem, and I can not share your opinion that 0.9.3
is completely unusable
thomas
Peter Lairo wrote:
Hi,
I just downloaded the latest milestone (0.9.3) and to my horror, found
out that several important things are broken:
snip list of deficiencies
Also the grippy to collaps the preview pane in mail/nes is on the left
side and not in the middle :(
--
Regards,
Peter
Peter Lairo wrote:
Hi,
I just downloaded the latest milestone (0.9.3) and to my horror, found
out that several important things are broken:
1. Dropdown lists (just look at any bug, or Netscape site) show the
dropdown items as an always visible vertical list (thus taking up a lot
of
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] says...
To the product team:
Congrats on making such a great browser. Keep up the good work!
The last millestones since M18 have been very good.
Tobias Rühle wrote:
Peter Lairo [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb im Newsbeitrag
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Hi,
1. Dropdown lists (just look at any bug, or Netscape site) show the
dropdown items as an always visible vertical list (thus taking up a lot
of screen space).
Did you
On Fri, 03 Aug 2001 10:41:49 +,
Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
:Can anyone see the content on this page in Mozilla 0.9.2?
:http://www.asktog.com/columns/049Lawyers.html
:For me, the page flickers in and out and refuses to load permanently. I
:don't know whether this is a page design problem
Garth Wallace wrote:
File Evangelism bugs against those sites and they'll be
sent emails requesting that they make their pages
standards-compliant.
When an evangelism bug is submitted does the webmaster simply get a
generic form letter, or are they told exactly what standards they need
to
Please excuse my ignorance / confusion.
Since 0.9.3 has been released I assumed that when I went to:
http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla/nightly/latest/
I would receive a build that said Mozilla 0.9.3+. Instead, it says
Mozilla 0.9.2+. Obviously this means that the nightly is based on
Styx-Kee Glue [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in
LzFa7.61560$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:LzFa7.61560$[EMAIL PROTECTED], on 03 Aug 2001:
Win32 build? No problem here.
Styx
I can't reproduce this anymore. Yes Win32 build. Perhaps part of that
small race condition that was being spoken about in the
In the latest trunk builds before today, this bug was gone. But today,
I installed .9.3 and bammo, it's back again. I figured since this was
fixed on the trunk that it was fixed for .9.3, but it appears not. Can
anyone confirm this for me?
--
ICQ: 123728792
AIM: FlyersR1 9
email: [EMAIL
As the developement team is in love with this annoying security
feature, they haven't bothered telling anyone how to disable it.
It really should be an installation option.
Or at least an undocumented change. I'm in complete agreement.
The only people who love this feature are the
Peter Lairo [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb im Newsbeitrag
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Hi,
1. Dropdown lists (just look at any bug, or Netscape site) show the
dropdown items as an always visible vertical list (thus taking up a lot
of screen space).
Did you enable the XBL-based
Whee... I personally find a zip file much more convenient :-P
Tom Christensen wrote:
Why have moz.org removed the installer.exe to install via the net!. ?
Incredible stupid now I have to download this *.zip file witch is a
hassel to get working.
Please get back installer.exe!!!.
On or about Fri, 03 Aug 2001 04:09:53 GMT, Mike Koenecke
[EMAIL PROTECTED] allegedly wrote:
On or about Wed, 01 Aug 2001 07:26:12 -0500, Jay Garcia
[EMAIL PROTECTED] allegedly wrote:
Mike Koenecke wrote:
Having just loaded Windows 2000 on my machine: does everyone else get
a couple of error
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 01 Aug 2001 14:56:28 -0400, Pratik
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
and the reason you're asking this in a Mozilla newsgroup is ..
Because Mozilla uses APLICATION DATA to store your home directory. If
I want to back it up, I will have to backup everything
Garth Wallace* ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
WTF was this [...?]
From: Dramar Ankalle
Subject: Re: U.S. Govt., 19th Century microbiological LUDDITES!!
Newsgroups: soc.culture.china, alt.politics.org.cia
Date: 2001-08-01 19:57:41 PST
Earth Observing System
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
not all) internet-related Services, it offers many ways for people to
attempt to break into your OS X machine. Fortunately, Mac OS X also
And what, praytell, are these many ways? Does the article make any
Jason Bassford wrote:
(I could not find a bugzilla specific newsgroup - my apologies if
this is OT.)
On Bugzilla's voting page it reads:
To change your votes, type in new numbers (using zero to mean no
votes) or change the checkbox, and then click Submit.
How, there is no place
YES, please give us the *full installer file*, not just this silly net
installer.
Tom Christensen wrote:
Why have moz.org removed the installer.exe to install via the net!. ?
Incredible stupid now I have to download this *.zip file witch is a
hassel to get working.
Please get back
(I could not find a bugzilla specific newsgroup - my apologies if
this is OT.)
On Bugzilla's voting page it reads:
To change your votes, type in new numbers (using zero to mean no
votes) or change the checkbox, and then click Submit.
How, there is no place to type in a number. The only
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Peter Lairo [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
1. Dropdown lists (just look at any bug, or Netscape site) show the
dropdown items as an always visible vertical list (thus taking up a lot
of screen space).
This does not happen for me on Win2000.
--
Rob Allen
Have you also noticed the dropdown list bug that makes this milestone
completely unusable?
from my other post: Dropdown lists (just look at any bug, or Netscape
site) show the dropdown items as an always visible vertical list (thus
taking up a lot of screen space).
Henning Schnoor wrote:
OK what I want to do is keep the program files for Mozilla in my
PROGRAM FILES directory but move the data files from
C:\WINDOWS\APPLICATION DATA to a second hard drive.
I will make an image of my C drive. So then I can drop a clean image
of C on to the C drive and have it look to the other
Gord McFee wrote:
In addition to which, quoting is broken in Mail/News and it crashes
every second reply.
Are you referring to the double-effect blue bar + ? This is a
Modern theme issue, switch to Classic for now.
Other than that, Mozilla has no problems with quoting.
Holger
--
Human
Garth Wallace wrote:
Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Garth Wallace wrote:
3) UNIX hasn't always been open source. Some versions still
aren't. GNU/Linux is open source, so are FreeBSD, NetBSD, and
I'm interested in helping fund the development of roaming access in Mozilla.
What I'd like to do is find several people who are willing to invest money
in funding a developer to get this done. I'm willing to put in $500 to
$1,000 myself.
Are there any people here that are interested in joining
Can anyone see the content on this page in Mozilla 0.9.2?
It works for me under 0.9.3. Sorry, I just finished installing the
latest prior to reading your message.
Jason.
Maybe you did not unzip the whole zip archive... Preserve directory
structure as well.
macondo wrote:
Newbie here. Uninstalled Moz 0.9.2 went to Find and deleted everything that said
Mozilla. D/led mozilla-win32-0.9.3talkback.zip, unzipped and clicked on
Mozilla.exe nothing, got a
Can't duplicate your problem.
Oh, the Composer is a little better. New window time about the same..
Memory used is still a bitch.
Not even a crash in 8 hours.
Peter Lairo wrote:
Hi,
I just downloaded the latest milestone (0.9.3) and to my horror, found
out that several important things
Shaq Kondo wrote:
When an evangelism bug is submitted does the webmaster simply get a
generic form letter, or are they told exactly what standards they need
to conform to? If so, are they then also pointed to some good websites
that cover the standards in question?
Might depend on a
If we get to the wonderful position of having no crash bugs, we do not
then land a whole slew of new features, however voted for they are. We
keep the stability and work towards shipping.
What about after shipping? I'm not necessarily only talking pre-1.0
release here. Will votes matter
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Wim Huls [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
The error is caused by the framename Pääkehys. Mozilla makes
P%C3%A4%C3%A4kehys of it. I don't know wether this is correct.
Putting 'ä' in an URL is wrong. Escaping it to %C3%A4 is the recovery
method suggested by the HTML
Garth Wallace wrote:
Yes, I understand that what I would like is to find a way around it.
Can I somehow assign the file this MIME type on the Macintosh? Or if I
just give its title an .eml extension, as you suggested, can I help
Communicator guess the correct type by adding
Gerard Allwein wrote:
Anyone, Maybe this is addressed some place but I couldn't find it.
On Mozilla 0.9.2, I go through the bookmark fix of customizing the
sidebar to remove the bookmarks, quit mozilla, fire it back up again,
and then then try to customize the sidebar again by adding the
And it came to pass that DeMoN LaG wrote:
Rob Allen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED], on 02 Aug 2001:
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Magnus Stenman
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
To follow up (a bit late maybe) on the why I don't use
NN/Moz thread:
I
Jason Bassford [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
(I could not find a bugzilla specific newsgroup - my apologies if
this is OT.)
That would be netscape.public.mozilla.webtools
On Bugzilla's voting page it reads:
To change your votes, type in
Newbie here. Uninstalled Moz 0.9.2 went to Find and deleted everything that said
Mozilla. D/led mozilla-win32-0.9.3talkback.zip, unzipped and clicked on
Mozilla.exe nothing, got a message: A required DLL file, XPCOM.DLL, was not
found, what gives? Version 0.9.2 worked pretty good...
Am I doing
JTK wrote:
One word for you Cher: Proxomitron (http://spywaresucks.org/prox/).
Now I have *not* yet checked if it works well with Mozilla, but I can
tell you it works exquisitely with IE and NC4.7x, and I will not browse
the web without it.
It works exquisitely with Mozilla too, and I
On or about Wed, 01 Aug 2001 07:26:12 -0500, Jay Garcia
[EMAIL PROTECTED] allegedly wrote:
Mike Koenecke wrote:
Having just loaded Windows 2000 on my machine: does everyone else get
a couple of error messages when Mozilla first runs?
What error messages?? Please be more specific.
I'll try,
Can anyone see the content on this page in Mozilla 0.9.2?
http://www.asktog.com/columns/049Lawyers.html
For me, the page flickers in and out and refuses to load permanently. I
don't know whether this is a page design problem or a browser bug.
The page content is viewable in source, but not on
And it came to pass that Gerard Allwein wrote:
Anyone, Maybe this is addressed some place but I couldn't
find it.
On Mozilla 0.9.2, I go through the bookmark fix of
customizing the sidebar to remove the bookmarks, quit
mozilla, fire it back up again, and then then try to
customize the
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Flacco
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
what the fuck is Alexa.com
It is an Amazon subsidiary that offers Web site What's related? data.
and why is Mozilla sending it all my URL requests?
That's an evil bug that manifests itself if you have not completely
deactivated
Hi,
I have several profiles in Netscape 4.78 and _one_ bookmark file for all
(I changed the line in prefs.js:
user_pref(browser.bookmark_location,
w:\\programme\\netscape\\users\\bookmark.htm);
Now I want to do this with Mozilla 0.9.3 (using the same file as in
Netscape), but I cannot find a
Henri Sivonen schrieb:
That's an evil bug that manifests itself if you have not completely
deactivated the sidebar and you haven't removed the What's related?
sidebar panel.
So how do I deactivate it /completely/? Is it not enough to uncheck View
| Sidebar?
Holger
--
Human beings, who
Hi,
I have several profiles in Netscape 4.78 and _one_ bookmark file for all
(I changed the line in prefs.js:
user_pref(browser.bookmark_location,
w:\\programme\\netscape\\users\\bookmark.htm);
Now I want to do this with Mozilla 0.9.3 (using the same file as in
Netscape), but I cannot find a
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Holger Metzger
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So how do I deactivate it /completely/? Is it not enough to uncheck View
| Sidebar?
Based on my own tests (using netstat), unchecking View Sidebar is
adequate, but minimizing the Sidebar is not. To be sure, it is a good
Chuck Simmons wrote:
Education is expensive, but so is ignorance.
If ignorance is bliss, why are there not more happy people?
My signature is from Shakespeare. He clearly saw your difficulty
understanding JTK 400 years ago. You are like Macbeth confronted by the
ghost of
I'm having a bit of some trouble while trying to install 0.9.3 on my
computer. When I run setup, I'm told that Setup thinks browser.xpi is
corrupted and I should get a new version of setup. I'm pretty sure my
version of setup is good, I just downloaded 0.9.3 using getright last
night. So,
Tim Wunder wrote:
Martin Poirier wrote:
Whee... I personally find a zip file much more convenient :-P
Tom Christensen wrote:
Why have moz.org removed the installer.exe to install via the net!.
?
Incredible stupid now I have to download this *.zip file witch is a
hassel to get
howdy all,
hey i'm having a devil of a time trying to get mozilla (under linux) to launch
any
helper apps. for instance under...edit - preferances - navigator
- helper applications...i have setup the mime type for audio/x-mpeurl to
launch xmms %s for file extintions .pls or .m3u
Jason Bassford wrote:
I would receive a build that said Mozilla 0.9.3+. Instead, it says
Mozilla 0.9.2+. Obviously this means that the nightly is based on the
0.9.2 branch.
in the nightly/-mm-dd-hh-trunk/ dirs are the nightly builds which
you expect in a -0.9.3+/ dir!
the 0.9.2ec/
ronin5150 wrote:
howdy all,
hey i'm having a devil of a time trying to get mozilla (under linux) to launch
any
helper apps. for instance under...edit - preferances - navigator
- helper applications...i have setup the mime type for audio/x-mpeurl to
launch xmms %s for file extintions
Just in case, calm yourself from other posts before reading this one :-).
Yeah, I don't understand it either ;-).
Maybe you think the project got potentials. :-)
It is indeed your call, as much as it is mine or anybody else's. If
there's something in there you disagree with, let's hear it
David Coppit wrote:
So here's my proposal: hype the bug voting some! Stick it on the main
mozilla page along side the bugzilla link. And integrate number of votes
in along with the talkback crash data, or at least keep a link to the
search page with the highest voted bugs/features.
I think
Holger Metzger wrote:
Gord McFee wrote:
In addition to which, quoting is broken in Mail/News and it crashes
every second reply.
Are you referring to the double-effect blue bar + ? This is a
Modern theme issue, switch to Classic for now.
Other than that, Mozilla has no problems with
In upgrading to either mozilla 0.9.2 or 0.9.3 from 0.9.1, fonts like
arial are displayed quite poorly and at a different size than 0.9.1.
Has anyone else found this problem? (I haven't seen anyone else
discuss this particular font problem.)
It's rather disappointing, since 0.9.3 seems to be
I should also note that I'm using RedHat 7.0
On Sat, 4 Aug 2001, Rick Crawford wrote:
In upgrading to either mozilla 0.9.2 or 0.9.3 from 0.9.1, fonts like
arial are displayed quite poorly and at a different size than 0.9.1.
Has anyone else found this problem? (I haven't seen anyone else
Gord McFee schrieb:
No, I am referring to quoting along the lines of Outlook Express. It
doesn't happen every time, but often I have to go to Options - Rewrap
to get it right.
Never had that problem.
But:
When replying to a mail, it /appears/ that Mozilla wraps quoted text the
wrong way,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
I could install spellcheck.xpi for M0.92 by downloading it from some
website. But this doesnt seem to work in M0.93. Has anyone been able
to install spellcheck.xpi for M0.93?
I'll let someone else answer that.
Has anyone been able to use Netscape 6.1 and Windows XP RC2 ?
After installation try launching it and get the splash screen and that's
it. It shuts down with no error messages.
On Sat, 4 Aug 2001 16:35:27 GMT, Dana DeLuca [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Has anyone been able to use Netscape 6.1 and Windows XP RC2 ?
After installation try launching it and get the splash screen and that's
it. It shuts down with no error messages.
?? Thats just the way Windows XP is suppose
Holger Metzger wrote:
Gord McFee schrieb:
No, I am referring to quoting along the lines of Outlook Express. It
doesn't happen every time, but often I have to go to Options - Rewrap
to get it right.
Never had that problem.
But:
When replying to a mail, it /appears/ that Mozilla
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I could install spellcheck.xpi for M0.92 by downloading it from some
website. But this doesnt seem to work in M0.93. Has anyone been able
to install spellcheck.xpi for M0.93?
Spellcheck won't work with 0.9.3.
--
Gord McFee
I'll write no line before its time
Gord McFee wrote:
Holger Metzger wrote:
Gord McFee schrieb:
No, I am referring to quoting along the lines of Outlook Express. It
doesn't happen every time, but often I have to go to Options -
Rewrap to get it right.
Never had that problem.
But:
When replying to a mail, it
Hi!
I have managed to get java and flash/shockwave running in mozilla
(by copying the dll's to \Mozilla\Plugins), but how do I activate
the realplayer plugin? Copying dll's from the Realplayer dir did
not work.
I have installed RealPlayer 8 Basic (rp8-de-setup.exe from
http://www.real.com), and
Seems to me that Mozilla can be a bit too picky about HTML... in
particular, see http://www.azeotrope.org/~khym/moztest.html
It's a bunch of lines like:
font size=2somethingbr
font size=2something elsebr
etc...
There are 200 lines like that, but Mozilla only shows the first 196. If
I fix it so
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Dana DeLuca [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Has anyone been able to use Netscape 6.1 and Windows XP RC2 ?
I haven't tried Netscape, but Mozilla 0.9.x works fine for me. Currently
using 0.9.3 on XP RC2.
--
Name: Dave Huang | Mammal, mammal / their names are
Dave Huang wrote:
Seems to me that Mozilla can be a bit too picky about HTML... in
particular, see http://www.azeotrope.org/~khym/moztest.html
It's a bunch of lines like:
font size=2somethingbr
font size=2something elsebr
etc...
There are 200 lines like that, but Mozilla only shows the
And it came to pass that Dave Huang wrote:
Seems to me that Mozilla can be a bit too picky about
HTML... in particular, see
http://www.azeotrope.org/~khym/moztest.html It's a bunch of
lines like:
font size=2somethingbr font size=2something elsebr
etc...
There are 200 lines like that,
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Christopher Jahn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So what you're saying is that since you're too lazy to write
good code, Mozilla should have many more lines of code to
overcome your laziness?
No, that's not what I'm saying. Sorry that you're not bright enough to
84 matches
Mail list logo
