Kenneth Pardue wrote:
You mentioned buy a copy for my mum, does that mean that this is strictly
designed for the simple of mind users?
I use it nearly every day and I'm not simple of mind. Well, not most
of the time at least ;-) It's very cool software and it's based on Mozilla.
--Asa
Geraint Edwards wrote:
dman84 wrote:
1. Spam avoidance.
Javascript stuff is turned off by default in mail news.. sounds like
quite a project..
What I am talking about is not javascript it is html email that includes
lines to the effect :
IMG
BugDays Are Back!
Join us this Thursday and Friday as we work to clean up the bug
database, weeding out duplicate reports, confirming or resolving bugs,
and adding comments and testcases to assist developers working on
difficult issues. We're getting very close to Mozilla 1.0. We need your
Chocobo_greens wrote:
snip
all i asked was that there be a alternavive version of mozilla without
the communist icons for those who wish not to have them.. or at least the
option of not having them .. is that too much to ask?
Your wish is my command.
http://beonex.com/communicator/
Asa Dotzler wrote:
On October 20, 2001 mozilla.org made available for download binaries of
the Mozilla 0.9.6 Milestone.
oops, that's actually supposed to read On _November_ 20, 2001
mozilla.org made
--Asa
We freeze for the milestone Tuesday night at midnight (that's
tomorrow!). The plan is to take fixes on the trunk Wednesday and
Thursday and then branch on Friday. During the frozen trunk and branch
period approval from [EMAIL PROTECTED] is required for checkin. To
request approval for checkin
Travis Crump wrote:
What URI do you use to keyword bugzilla?
Are you looking for this? http://www.mozilla.org/docs/end-user/keywords.html
--Asa
Andrea Monni wrote:
Anyone here was at the developer day?
Any report about it?
Andrea
I was. It was great fun and very educational. There are some notes from
the Chief Lizard Wrangler, mitchell baker, at
http://www.mozilla.org/events/notes-from-nov9.html
--Asa
Fulvio Perini wrote:
I have tried to find out somewhere of the status or progress of some
features which are missing in Mozilla/NS6.I did searches in mozilla.org
and I came up empty handed.
1.Print Preview,as good as it is NS4.xx
2.Hovering with mouse over an e-mail summary title.I have had
David Coppit wrote:
snip
Okay, so if I understand you correctly, the Mozilla development team has
defined the boundaries of what is considered to be part of the
development effort, and what is left to user agents.
The Mozilla development community, with technical leadership from
Mozilla
Thomas Gilfether and Jonathan Carver wrote:
after installing last night's nightly build 0.9.4, i was setting my
preferences and looked through debug (don't know what that means to me
(an end user only)... i then closed the preferences and went back to
viewing a page... when i attempted to
JTK wrote:
Alright:
1. The GIMP is cool.
Yes. The GIMP is cool. I agree with you.
2. Will the Mozilla project accept reasonable[1] artwork contributions,
add them to http://www.mozilla.org/banners/,
Why do they have to be added to banners/?
and let the people (as in
users, not
Pratik wrote:
snip
Interesting, but it's not popping up with each nightly install here,
only with that ONE build. Haven't seen it since.
I agree. It popped up once but I haven't seen it since. And I just use
tarballs (linux) and zip files (windows), never any installers. And it
Jay Garcia wrote:
snip
The first run page overrides the preference start with blank page ??
Seems to have done that here. But as you said this feature has
disappeared with subsequent nightlies.
Thanks for the explanation.
Correct. There are two pages. The first run (not sure what it's
JTK wrote:
Huh, that's interesting, because the lastest nightly comes up with a
Netscape 6: What's New? page:
http://home.netscape.com/browsers/6/su_setup.html
Lord.
You've obviously installed a Netscape 6 build and shared a profile
between Mozilla and netscape 6. This is not
Steven T. Hatton wrote:
What part of the Mozilla archetecture is responsible for opening
windows, setting up the HTMLDocument, returning the window object back
to the requester, etc? I'm particularly interested in the JavaScript
API implementation.
TIA,
Steven
Are you looking
JTK wrote:
Test time and date: Mon Sep 3 17:12:06 2001
Total number of files: 29228
Total number of licensed files: 14430
Total number of NPLed files: 9691
Total number of MPLed files: 4739
Total number of GPLed files: 2044
Percent licensed under
Ere Maijala wrote:
Hi,
just noticed that Mozilla and the web pages it displays turn out pretty
ugly when running under Windows 2000 Terminal Services (which is limited
to 256 colors). In Mozilla itself, splash screen and modern theme look
especially bad. Could it be bug 96770
Ben Ruppel wrote:
Hey, thanks for the detailed info. I agree about IE's right clicking
problem.
I am perplexed as to why I (and a couple of others) have the freeze
problem. Note that this problem begins before the page even starts
painting, it happens somewhere while the data is
Christopher Jahn wrote:
And it came to pass that shay wrote:
Hi.
I'm using Moz 0.9.3. Is there any way to export my address
book into a format that I can sync with with my palm?
snip
For reasons unknown, this critical function is not yet to be
found in Mozilla.
You must be
JTK wrote:
Sam Emrick wrote:
I think it would Be A Good Thing to simply PROHIBIT Mozilla vs Internet
Explorer performance comparison or discussion here.
Why? What are you afraid of? I say it would Be A Good Thing if there
were a lot MORE Mozilla vs. IE performance comparisons (i.e.,
JTK wrote:
To Pratik, Blake, barney, Phillip, and the rest of the dozen or so folks
who have used Composer in the past:
Did you guys miss this part of my post?:
Ship it as a separate product. - Gary R. Van Sickle
No.
My one and only point here is that it has no business as part of
JTK wrote:
JTK wrote:
[snip]
... 90% will do so to get an email/newsreader, and 1%
^^^
Sorry: 1%
you collected this data how?
--Asa
Peter Lairo wrote:
Pratik wrote:
Peter Lairo wrote:
I clicked on your link and it caused mozilla to crash (again). Could
someone please help me on this dilemma?
Get Talkback, make mozilla crash again and if you're lucky to get a
Talkback ID, file a bug and post to this ng and post
David A. Cobb wrote:
I installed the latest Mozilla release this month (0.92? - I can't
access it right now).
When I select MailNews I get the start screen; however, if I try to
select the mail account I immediately incur an Invalid Page Fault.
I'm confident the mailer was never
Pierre Chanial wrote:
snip
Please could you clarify the following point:
Can Netscape stop the Open-source Project at any time and take their NPL
files with them so that Mozilla could not use them anymore?
No.
--Asa
Hall Stevenson wrote:
snip
My point is: Go to a website that offers links to the various web
browsers. You'll have IE v5.x, Netscape 4.7x, NEtscape 6.1, Opera 5.x,
and mozilla 1.x. To the average user, the higher numbers are better.
mozilla 1.x will likely be the last one they even
poster wrote:
*** post for FREE via your newsreader at post.newsfeeds.com ***
I made my first installation of Mozilla today v 0.93 [OS win95].
I worked fine after I opened it a couple of times.
But now I cant open the browser and get the following:
MOZILLA.EXE caused fault #c005
JTK wrote:
Garth Wallace wrote:
JTK [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
What I find rather odd is that while many here cry
Mozilla isn't for users!, Netscape 6.x, which is no more than Mozilla
with an AOL sticker on it, is supposed to be the Mozila
Hall Stevenson wrote:
Will it be like this forever? Isn't Mozilla at some
point going to be a browser for regular users as
well?
Yes to #1, no to #2. Mozilla is intended to be
packaged by other companies for the user market.
The builds provided by Mozilla are just for
testing purposes, and will
Hall Stevenson wrote:
* Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T. ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [010822 19:35]:
Hall Stevenson wrote:
What's the point of an 'installer' version of mozilla then ?? That
makes it awfully easy for end-users to download and use. I would
think that a re-packager would take care of an
Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T. wrote:
snip
If it turns itself back on from closing to reopening (quiting and
openning) sounds like a bug.
Communicator has the ability to turn Javascript on and off in mail and
news and it stays put until you turn it back on.
Sorry for bring up something that
Peter Lairo wrote:
snip
The original method was clearly much better, because it made more
efficient use of the limited space.
...and having made a comment in the newsgroup now you're clearly a
usability expert. My personal opinion is that the new folder pane is
lightyears beyond the
Jason Bassford wrote:
snip
In fact, I think you may have missed the point of the discussion.
It hasn't been about what you should be doing but what should be done
in general. This is, or should have been, a high level discussion
on strategy and principles, not about who, specifically,
Jason Bassford wrote:
first thing I'd recommend is getting to know some of the other Mac
developers on the project. Check out the netscape.public.mozilla.mac
newsgroup and maybe introduce yourself there. If you haven't already,
start downloading daily Fizzilla builds
...and more
Jason Bassford wrote:
in coding, I wish there was an easier way to identify good ways to get
my feet wet. Maybe Peter's specific suggestion is wrong, but his
motivations are good.
I agree. I'm not stuck up on the keyword itself specifically
either, I'm just trying to get help for
Peter Lairo wrote:
You have put together a list. I don't see a bunch of newbie Mozilla
hackers jumping on those bugs and fixing them. What makes you think
that if the 20 or so bugs in your list had a keyword that would be any
different. I'm arguing that a keywords doesn't help anything.
Andrew MacDonald wrote:
I know C++ (did some OS hacking; network hacking at school last year), I
know some javascript, but that was a while ago. I've messed around a bit
in XML doing some work for a company last year, but I can't say it was a
huge experience. I'm very familiar with HTML -
Asa Dotzler wrote:
Andrew MacDonald wrote:
snip
I wish there was an easier way to identify good ways to get
my feet wet.
Andrew, because Peter thinks his keyword is really useful I'm giving you
a list of bugs that Peter has determined to be low risk (they're not,
trust me
Al Smith wrote:
This has happened in Mozilla milestones, and just today I noticed it in
Netscape 6.1. Somehow JavaScript is turning itself on for Main and News.
Does anyone know why this is happening?
When I download a new milestone or nightly of Mozilla, everything is
already turned on
Paul Bergsagel wrote:
I appear to be out of the loop. What is the the goal of Mozilla quest.
Is Mike Angelo actually folowing the Mozilla project or simply
practicing journalism National Inquisitor style? Is he for real or a joke?
Paul.
Michael Angelo Buonarroti (1475-1564) ??
--Asa
Bob Davis wrote:
There are cookies that never get written to disk.
Is there a way to display these?
I was trying to do it with jscript but dont know enough.
thanks
bob
Tasks|Privacy Security|Cookie Manager|View Stored Cookies
--Asa
Ed Burns wrote:
I'd love to have a graph of number of new/unconfirmed bugs on a given
category per week. How could I gather the data for such a graph?
Ed, there are already some of these types of reports available at
http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/reports.cgi If you can't find the chart
Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T. wrote:
snip
The My side bar is in the third pane (at least it is the way its setup
in the Mac version).
The My Sidebar resides below the folders. I prefer using two pane mode
because of the small monitor I have to use.
You said:
ahh! but remember if you turn off
Ian Hickson wrote:
On Mon, 18 Jun 2001, Marcin Januchta wrote:
You may find this question silly, but what/who is RMS and GPL?
Not a silly question at all.
RMS is Richard Stallman, the founder of the Free Software Foundation (FSF)
and the GNU (which stands for GNU's Not Unix) project.
Ian Hickson wrote:
On Mon, 18 Jun 2001, Marcin Januchta wrote:
You may find this question silly, but what/who is RMS and GPL?
Not a silly question at all.
RMS is Richard Stallman, the founder of the Free Software Foundation (FSF)
and the GNU (which stands for GNU's Not Unix) project.
Phil Edwards wrote:
Every time I try to do an advanced Bugzilla query, Moz 0.9.1 shoots to
solid CPU usage as the results are being displayed. I have to SIGKILL
it from an xterm. It's repeatable every time. (Using linux.) I have no
idea what it's doing. Even with only 50 or so matches,
Bagus Mahawan wrote:
Hi,
I've seen gtkembed's memory leak test results on
netscape.public.mozilla.embedding, but I couldn't find any leak information
of mozilla itself.
How is mozilla memory leak tested ? Is there any docs on leak test and its
results ?
Regards,
Bagus
gtkembed is
DeMoN_LaG wrote:
JTK wrote:
snip
This better? I have to apologize, I am not nearly nerdly enough to
have known
that you needed a space after the two minuses. And I'm using a web-based
newsgroup reader, which Maozilla won't interface to to do such
wonderful
things for me.
JTK wrote:
snip
NOBODY uses Win9x because they like it! They use it only because they
have no other realistic option, and nobody seems to be willing to give
them one.
I'm nobody. I like Windows 98 more than NT, 2K or XP. I have them all
running, along with Mac OS 8.5, 9.1 and X, and
Hans-Peter Fischer wrote:
I'm using Linux at home, too, but not Mozilla's Mail/News component. Last
time I checked it wasn't really designed for minimum online time, which
is important in Europe.
Grab a current nightly build. Much off-line functionality has come into
the product in the
Chris Howells wrote:
There are two things stopping me using Mozilla full time:
1) E-mail filters did not work with large numbers of messages (e.g.
hundreds -- I get that number daily) -- they all got put into the inbox,
not the correct folders (that was ages ago though)
Works for me
Peter Lairo wrote:
Asa Dotzler wrote:
Ashant wrote:
where can i find a list of all the command line options that can be
given to mozilla?
./mozilla -help
--Asa
and where in the helpfile are the command line arguments? i couldn't
find them.
Do you have a link
Henri Sivonen wrote:
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Asa Dotzler
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just because someone hasn't done it doesn't make it impossible. It
would actually be pretty easy to make a standalone mail or composer
client.
Why isn't MailNews a separate app if it would
TommyBee wrote:
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Asa Dotzler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
TommyBee wrote:
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Alex [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
TommyBee wrote:
- Why isn't Composer a separate module? I have a feeling that very few
people are going to use Mozilla
TommyBee wrote:
snip
I don't know that the work itself should be independent, but I like the
idea of having the front ends be separate applications. Perhaps that
way the preferences of each module would be less susceptible to
corruption by the other modules. (Darn you, .msf files!)
Ashant wrote:
where can i find a list of all the command line options that can be
given to mozilla?
./mozilla -help
--Asa
TommyBee wrote:
snip
What I don't understand is the
integration of Navigator itself into this core, making it impossible to
install a functional browserless Mozilla (a Mail / News standalone
application, for example).
Just because someone hasn't done it doesn't make it impossible.
TommyBee wrote:
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Alex [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
TommyBee wrote:
- Why is the Address Book still included if I didn't install Mail /
News? I see no function for an Address Book in a plain ol' web browser.
- Why isn't Composer a separate module? I have a
Peter Moscatt wrote:
I am currently using Mozilla 0.8 and now see there is a newer version.
Is it worth to upgrade ?
Pete
0.8.1 is a little more stable than 0.9 and 0.8 both but 0.9 has some
major performance improvements in mail-news and PSM. see the release
notes at
Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T. wrote:
snip
Its been pointed out that Mozilla is up to Version .9. Yet Netscape 6 is
based on Mozilla .6
Close to 6 month to a year old?
They should be implementing the same code checking daily (or on same
time schedule) as Mozilla.
N6 should be using M .9
Today's builds are automatically marking the radio button for Reassing
bug to so any changes you submit to a bug with today's build will
reassign the bug to it's current owner which sets Status to New. Please
do not use today's builds or if you do please make sure you check the
Leave as
Ed Burns wrote:
Hello Folks,
Anyone else seeing this? I use the Dvorak key map and when I started up
today's build of mozilla, I find that it occasionally ignores the dvorak
mapping and goes back to qwerty some how. Is anyone else seeing this?
Should I file a bug?
I heard danm was
{fws} Frank wrote:
snip
However, on complience withe W3W, I believe Opera is almost, if not as
much in complience as Mozilla.
wrong. couldn't be more wrong. not even close.
--Asa
Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T. wrote:
Phil Edwards wrote:
On Sun, May 13, 2001 at 02:26:04AM -0700, Alex wrote:
One of the things that you have to forgo is official tech support. There
isn't any official Mozilla tech support, since it is intended for
developers and people (largely volunteers)
Daniel Veditz wrote:
Gervase Markham wrote:
Is it possible for a mere bug-reporter to look through talkback data
to look for stack traces duplicate/similar to the ones you find?
No. :-( You'll need to ask [EMAIL PROTECTED] for a specific talkback ID.
Yes, this sucks.
Gerv
A summary of
Karl Ove Hufthammer wrote:
Keyur M. Parekh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
The new theme is much much better then the old one very professional
and clean. I like the colors a lot better too, the older ones were
quite garish.
Yes, I really like the new theme, but
burtonator wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hm.
While I like the new modern theme, I also like the old modern theme. Is there
any way we can have both in the build?
Kevin
No. I do not believe that there is much chance of that happening. The
old Modern has
Matthew Cline wrote:
For the Mozilla nightly I just downloaded (April 30), the Modern
theme seems to have changed a great deal. Is this a bug or a feautre?
If it's intentional, I want the old one back! *temper tantrum*
It is very intentional. The Modern theme has been upgraded.
In response to the large number of bugs nominated and targeted by the
community against Mozilla 0.9 and our desire to maintain 0.9 as a
recommended beta branch point we have added one additional milestone to
the schedule. This new Mozilla 0.8.1 Milestone will replace the 0.9
milestone in the
Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T. wrote:
snip
I wish people would try to understand, that I represent people that
"use" the web, "use" email, "use" newsgroups. I'm not a designer/
developer. If that grates you nerves, I'm sorry; that's just the way it is.
Phillip, you're either more than typical
Phil Sweeney wrote:
Asa Dotzler wrote:
Warren Bell wrote:
I went to download a nightly for win32 and there wasn't any windows
builds there. Not even a previous nightly build. Did they move them?
the win32 builds had not finished yet and the builds that were there
from yesterday
Bug 70312
Roy R. Campbell, Jr. wrote:
I'm of the opinion that it was nothing I did, but I could be wrong. At
any rate, the WIN32 build that followed 2001022605, (Build 2001022705, I
think?) destroyed my bookmarks.html file twice. I didn't notice it
until I opened the browser the
Claus Atzenbeck wrote:
By installing java (Mozilla 0.8/Linux, auto installing java plugin), I got
several times an error. Finally I got the message that the java plugin is
supposed to be installed correctly.
I restarted Mozilla, but it still tells me that it need the Java plugin.
Java
Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T. wrote:
snip
To bolster Mr Clark's Last paragraph. I have a problem with a Boken
image with the Netcenter News letter I receive through Communicator. All
images work excpet for the title image tha's supposed to say Netcenter
News. I periodical reported the problem
Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T. wrote:
Layer is prosona non grata in Mozilla and Netscape 6.
Both are standards compliant (100%) and according to W3C standards
Layers shouldn't even exist.
Sorry!
Both are not 100% standards compliant. Current Mozilla builds are a bit better than
Netscape 6 and
crVaRioR wrote:
Hi everybody !
I've downloaded and installed Mozilla 0.8 and the Java Plugin 1.3 for
Netscape 6 Linux, but it doesn't work : when a site uses Java, the
window for downloading the appropriate plugin appears...
Could you help me ?
Thx in advance !
VaRioR
create a
Warren Bell wrote:
I've noticed that the form and password managers are gone from the
advanced preferences. Are they moved, temporarily gone or taken out
permanently? I did a search on bugzilla but came up empty.
bug 69667, failed attempt to move wallet items into an overlay. Fixed
in
Warren Bell wrote:
Is anyone working on any file type icons for windows? Like the ones
windows assignes to HTML documents, gifs, etc when mozilla is the
default application for them.
yes. people are. query Bugzilla for summary substring 'icon'.
--Asa
Braden McDaniel wrote:
snip
Shoot the messenger, why don't you?
Asa, I really don't think I could have labelled my posting as sarcasm any
more clearly. Do you *really* think that people who want to subvert and
abuse the system need me to tell them how to do it? C'mon.
Don't try to
Braden McDaniel wrote:
snip
See, Bugzilla has this voting system, where users can vote on what bugs
they think are important. Problem is, you only get to cast five votes per
product.
10 votes per component actually.
I see that you have Resolved 10 bugs as Duplicates
Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T. wrote:
snip
In Mozilla to hide read messages only works if its set to all in
messages unread in sort no other combination works. This even includes
build 10:10020208 which is last monday's nightly (or latest)
There you go again. Please consider using statements
Robert Ennis wrote:
Right! And what the hell is C.E.T.?
Central European Time? Not sure. But personal attacks are not welcome here.
--Asa
jahirul wrote:
Hello All,
I can't access SSL site anymore through my mozilla. I have downloaded
all daily build hoping it will be fixed, done clean install, even though
build comments says' (http://www.mozillazine.org/build_comments/) it has
been fixed , it is still not working for me.
Stephen Moehle wrote:
Asa Dotzler wrote:
Stephen Moehle wrote:
snip
At the same time, no one wants to rewrite everything because someone
decided to change the rules, which is why backwards compatibility is
good.
Stephen Moehle
What seems to be missing from this thread
James Copand wrote:
snip
. I would like to temporarily and
completely remove Mozilla 0.7 from my system including the Windows 98
registry entries. What is the correct procedure for doing this?
Mozilla does not create registry entries in the windows registry.
To remove mozilla from your
Tarlach wrote:
snip
I have been trying for a while to get someone to acknowledge this problem
and no one has responded I was told to go get the Sun JRE but that was
only one voice and no one from mozilla or netscape has mentioned a fix...
OK. I acknowledge that you are having a
Peter Lairo wrote:
copying and pasting text into mail and forms currently does some
very strange things:
snip
The newsgroups are not the best place to report bugs. We actually have a
tool for reporting bugs. It's called Bugzilla.
Please query for your bugs in Bugzilla
My one quick query turned up these bugs. Do either of them look like
your problem? http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/buglist.cgi?bug_id=,63074,63344
or maybe http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=63490
--Asa
Chris wrote:
Ladies and Gentlemen,
I apologize if I've missed something about this elsewhere in the
newsgroup, but I need some sort of utility to extract my addresses and
mail from outlook2000 and convert them into a format mozilla can deal
with. I'm in the process of moving from
Jeff Wollschleager wrote:
snip
Ok, i've got it. Latest is whatever has hit the ftp last, could be
mtest or mtrunk. Thank you.
Might want to look into changing the link on
http://www.mozilla.org/binaries.html Download Latest Build to the
MTrunk directory.
Thanks for your patience
Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T. wrote:
Asa,
I reliaze that we are talking about Mozilla.
Talkback is included with both Mozilla, and netscape6 for Mac
point me to a mac Mozilla build with talkback.
--Asa
Jeff Wollschleager wrote:
snip
Thanks for the input Asa and it's a moot point now considering I did get
todays build w/PSM. Yes I had deleted PSM, did total install as usual.
Usually download nightlys every 2-3 days so pretty familar with the
process. If you read my above post something
Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T. wrote:
Your not missing much with Talkback.
It been my experience on Mac that Talkback cause crashes instead of
reporting them. On Communicator for Mac the recomended course is to
remove all traces of Talkback in Communicator and in system Files
Talkback and Full
Jeff Wollschleager wrote:
Asa Dotzler wrote:
Jeff Wollschleager wrote:
Todays nightly 0122 doesn't include the PSM? Whats up with that?
It certainly does. I've tested the mac
http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla/nightly/2001-01-22-04-Mtrunk/MacMozillaInstaller.sea.bin,
win32
Robert Ennis wrote:
One other thing. I was so delighted with 0.7, especially after enduring
NS 6 on a Mac, that I'm afraid to mess up what I have with another
nightly build. When you go to the Mozilla site, it's hard to know what
you'll get. Again, I don't pretend to be in the same league
Jeff Wollschleager wrote:
Todays nightly 0122 doesn't include the PSM? Whats up with that?
It certainly does. I've tested the mac
http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla/nightly/2001-01-22-04-Mtrunk/MacMozillaInstaller.sea.bin,
win32
Alvin Wong wrote:
I'm using 0.7 and it's been working pretty well...except that I can't
install the Sun Java 1.3_01 plug-in. I've tried running the jre13i.exe
file and I've tried clicking on Java applets to bring up the plug-in
install window. Nothing works.
Any suggestions on why this
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I work at Sun and we have a bunch of troubleshooting information about
running Netscape 6 on Solaris. Nearly all of this information pertains
to Mozilla, and most of it also applies on Linux. I have gila access.
What would be the best place on
Duke Ellington wrote:
In netscape.public.mozilla.general the people heard Asa Dotzler say these
wise words:
I'll let you go over to ActiveState and tell them that they should scrap
their Mozilla based cross-platform, multi-language Integrated
Development Environment (IDE) which
1 - 100 of 110 matches
Mail list logo
