fuss was raised during the beta program such backward compatibility was added so
that an applet signed using Netscape signing for Netscape 4.x would run under
Netscape 6. I can't comment on Java to JavaScript communication since we do not
use it, but don't give up on the ability to do basic
Mark--I can't agree with you more. And I can't possibly tell you how
disappointed I was with my attempt at using Netscape 6. I sent away for
Netscape's CD rather than download the whole package. Once installed, I
found Netscape 6 to be:
* Very slow (although it did tell me it needed a
On Thu, 10 May 2001 06:18:47 -0400, Up-state NY, U.S.A. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
somehow managed to type:
Mark--I can't agree with you more.=A0 And I can't possibly tell you how
disappointed I was with my attempt at using Netscape 6.
Netscape 6 was a marketing decision. Netscape saw a series of
Up-state NY, U.S.A. wrote:
Mark--I can't agree with you more. And I can't possibly tell you how
disappointed I was with my attempt at using Netscape 6. I sent away for
Netscape's CD rather than download the whole package. Once installed, I
found Netscape 6 to be:
* Very slow
Yeah well, it ain't finished. It was a mistake to release it.
The latest open source release, Mozilla 0.9 is usable (0.8 was the first
release that could be considered usable for anything other than testing
sites)
Don't think they've ironed out all the java issues yet though, and I _know_
It has been posted that Netscape 6.01 is not Java compatible and
prevents signed applets from running.
Signed applets cannot communicate with Javascript on web pages.
Netscape has released a product that breaks most applets being used
today and prevents customers from supporting netscape on
Mark A Gregory wrote:
It has been posted that Netscape 6.01 is not Java compatible and
prevents signed applets from running.
Signed applets cannot communicate with Javascript on web pages.
Netscape has released a product that breaks most applets being used
today and prevents customers
