I did a quick lookup, apparently Quay Computers is in New Zealand.
$1US = $2.41NZ
47 x 2.41 = 113.27
Given the greater competition here in the US and greater shipping
charges getting memory to NZ, that sounds about right.
I just bought 1Gz Athlon,GeForce 2 GTS,256 RAM, and a 20GB HD for my
Mama Cass Elliot wrote:
Now that's interesting - 'coz only in the last few days has the best
computer shop here (Quay Computers) reduced the price of 256mb RAM to $150
down from $300! Thus, I doubt your $47 - especially as 512megs is approx
$500 - as currently listed on their website!
And
I know this is off-topic, but I just checked Tiger Direct. They have
an Athlon 1.2 gig. processor for $170. I just bought one from
Thompson's Computer Warehouse (http://www.tcwo.com) for $111. Memory
prices are comparable: 256 MB of PC133 is $48. TCWO ships UPS ground
for a flat fee of $6.95, and
Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T. wrote:
snip
The My side bar is in the third pane (at least it is the way its setup
in the Mac version).
The My Sidebar resides below the folders. I prefer using two pane mode
because of the small monitor I have to use.
You said:
ahh! but remember if you turn off
Asa Dotzler wrote:
Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T. wrote:
snip
The My side bar is in the third pane (at least it is the way its setup
in the Mac version).
The My Sidebar resides below the folders. I prefer using two pane mode
because of the small monitor I have to use.
You said:
JTK wrote:
jesus X wrote:
JTK wrote:
Huh? You mean where your Favorites are on the left side of the
screen? That's been in IE forever.
Yeah, but the Mozilla Sidebar is MUCH more than just a bookmarks pane.
No, it's little more, and not executed as well (eg, the IE ones
On Mon, 25 Jun 2001 11:45:32 -0700, Blake Ross [EMAIL PROTECTED]
somehow managed to type:
We have history, and also 500 other sidebar tabs that IE doesn't offer.
Get your facts straight before you flame, at the very least.
He doesn't need to. When proven wrong, he stops responding, and
Carlfish wrote:
On Mon, 25 Jun 2001 11:45:32 -0700, Blake Ross [EMAIL PROTECTED]
somehow managed to type:
We have history, and also 500 other sidebar tabs that IE doesn't offer.
Get your facts straight before you flame, at the very least.
He doesn't need to. When proven wrong, he
JTK wrote:
I don't want to put anything in it. Well, History, but I'm sure that's RSN,
right?
No, it's Been There, Done That, Got the T-Shirt. There's already a history
sidebar now.
Yay. Tell me Savior, how much XUL or Javascript or whatever do I have to
write to put something in there?
JTK wrote:
Speed, memory efficiency, and market share seem to be missing with Maozilla.
Who needs to catch up to whom here?
IE is going to need to catch up. Mozilla's speed is improving every day.
Mozilla's memory use is already at or below that of IE if you count everything
IE uses.
JTK wrote:
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Greg Miller says...
JTK wrote:
It's looking pretty polished folks, I suggest you take a look. The
world ain't standing still while Maozilla figues out how to draw
controls inside the lines.
With another hundred or so of these, maybe they'll catch
Carlfish wrote:
On 23 Jun 2001 03:11:55 GMT, Carlfish [EMAIL PROTECTED]
somehow managed to type:
On Fri, 22 Jun 2001 22:23:08 -0400, DeMoN_LaG
[EMAIL PROTECTED] somehow managed to type:
You must not use Mozilla. It visibly renders the same speed as IE on my
system. Faster on
On Sun, 24 Jun 2001 07:02:11 -0400, Bill Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED]
somehow managed to type:
URL please?
Disclaimer:
The markup does suck from a semantic point of view - the page was halfway
through the transition between machine-generated markup and
human-generated when it became clear the
Mama Cass Elliot wrote:
In netscape.public.mozilla.general the people heard Greg Miller say these
wise words:
Memory efficiency is likewise good enough that it doesn't affect me. I
don't care whether I have 20MB of wasted RAM or 50MB wasted.
Somehow, I doubt if a person with the
Mama Cass Elliot wrote:
In netscape.public.mozilla.general the people heard jesus X say these
wise words:
And the rendering engine is getting very long in the tooth. NS kept
beating on the dead horse that was their old rendering engine for years
too long, and IE is following suit. Not
Mama Cass Elliot wrote:
Mind due, if it aint broke, don't fix it! is a pretty good maxim.
After all, why re-invent the wheel every year or so?
I'm not talking about reinventing the wheel, but to extend your metaphor, ever
see a train with wooden wheels?
--
jesus X [ Booze-fueled paragon of
Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T. wrote:
Ian Hickson wrote:
On Sat, 23 Jun 2001, JTK wrote:
I don't want to put anything in [the sidebar]. Well, History, but
I'm sure that's RSN, right?
As was mentioned multiple times by multiple people when you LAST
brought this up,
Mama Cass Elliot wrote:
In netscape.public.mozilla.general the people heard Greg Miller say these
wise words:
Memory efficiency is likewise good enough that it doesn't affect me. I
don't care whether I have 20MB of wasted RAM or 50MB wasted.
Somehow, I doubt if a person with the
Albert wrote:
Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T. wrote:
Ian Hickson wrote:
On Sat, 23 Jun 2001, JTK wrote:
I don't want to put anything in [the sidebar]. Well, History, but
I'm sure that's RSN, right?
As was mentioned multiple times by multiple people when you
Greg Miller wrote:
JTK wrote:
It's looking pretty polished folks, I suggest you take a look. The
world ain't standing still while Maozilla figues out how to draw
controls inside the lines.
With another hundred or so of these, maybe they'll catch up to Mozilla?
Forward progress seems
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], jesus X says...
JTK wrote:
No, it's little more, and not executed as well (eg, the IE ones
disappear completely when they're disabled).
No, it's much more. the sidebar can contain almost anything you want to put in
it.
I don't want to put anything in it. Well,
N6.1PR1 score 149
IE6beta score 36
:)
On 23 Jun 2001 03:11:55 GMT, Carlfish [EMAIL PROTECTED]
somehow managed to type:
On Fri, 22 Jun 2001 22:23:08 -0400, DeMoN_LaG
[EMAIL PROTECTED] somehow managed to type:
You must not use Mozilla. It visibly renders the same speed as IE on my
system. Faster on some pages, actually.
Ian Hickson wrote:
...
No, I mean the user-customisable sidebar to which you can add custom
content. However, Blake tells me that IE have retracted this feature
in the most recent builds, so forget I mentioned it.
...
Yeah. http://wininformant.com/Articles/Index.cfm?ArticleID=20648
Internet
JTK wrote:
It's looking pretty polished folks, I suggest you take a look. The
world ain't standing still while Maozilla figues out how to draw
controls inside the lines.
With another hundred or so of these, maybe they'll catch up to Mozilla?
Forward progress seems to be lacking with IE.
On Sat, 23 Jun 2001, JTK wrote:
I don't want to put anything in [the sidebar]. Well, History, but
I'm sure that's RSN, right?
As was mentioned multiple times by multiple people when you LAST
brought this up, Mozilla already has a history sidebar.
It can display RDFs from your favorite
On Sun, 24 Jun 2001 06:11:12 GMT, JTK [EMAIL PROTECTED]
somehow managed to type:
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Greg Miller says...
With another hundred or so of these, maybe they'll catch up to Mozilla?
Forward progress seems to be lacking with IE.
Speed, memory efficiency, and market
Valeri Todorov wrote:
Hello,
Huh? You mean where your Favorites are on the left side of the
screen? That's been in IE forever.
Yeah, but the Mozilla Sidebar is MUCH more than just a bookmarks pane. It is
like a secondary mini-browser, displaying a set of content YOU define with ease.
JTK wrote:
It's looking pretty polished folks, I suggest you take a look. The
world ain't standing still while Maozilla figues out how to draw
controls inside the lines.
Polished? Of course it is. IE 6 should have been called 5.6. Wasn't 6.0
supposed to be a significant rewrite of the html
Depends on your operating system. Usually win98 version is released first.
DeMoN_LaG wrote:
JTK wrote:
Marc Leger wrote:
JTK [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
It's looking pretty polished folks, I suggest you take a look. The
world ain't
Sol Hell wrote:
Depends on your operating system. Usually win98 version is released first.
I'm looking at the Windows Update site and at the IE6 preview site,
neither seem to have anything newer. I do, however, notice that IE6's
minimum install size on Win NT/2k is 75Megs, on 98/SE it's
jesus X wrote:
JTK wrote:
Huh? You mean where your Favorites are on the left side of the
screen? That's been in IE forever.
Yeah, but the Mozilla Sidebar is MUCH more than just a bookmarks pane.
No, it's little more, and not executed as well (eg, the IE ones
disappear completely when
JTK wrote:
jesus X wrote:
JTK wrote:
Huh? You mean where your Favorites are on the left side of the
screen? That's been in IE forever.
Yeah, but the Mozilla Sidebar is MUCH more than just a bookmarks pane.
No, it's little more, and not executed as well (eg, the IE ones
DeMoN_LaG wrote:
Valeri Todorov wrote:
Hello,
Huh? You mean where your Favorites are on the left side of the
screen? That's been in IE forever.
Yeah, but the Mozilla Sidebar is MUCH more than just a bookmarks pane. It is
like a secondary mini-browser, displaying a set of
On Fri, 22 Jun 2001, JTK wrote:
Except 20MB and 8 times slower rendering.
Well, 10MB and 4 times, but who can blame you for exaggerating.
I refer people who want to know the accurate numbers to the
n.p.mozilla.performance newsgroup.
--
Ian Hickson )\
Ian Hickson wrote:
On Fri, 22 Jun 2001, JTK wrote:
Except 20MB and 8 times slower rendering.
Well, 10MB and 4 times, but who can blame you for exaggerating.
Touche, mon ami. The difference between IE's memory usage and
Mathuzilla's is in fact not ~20MB (that's Maozilla's total
On Fri, 22 Jun 2001, JTK wrote:
As for the 4 times, it was stated by somebody in .performance only
a week or so ago to be ~8 times slower [than IE].
Yes. Things are moving fast.
I have no way to directly compare myself, so I can only repeat what
I've heard from others.
On local network
Ian Hickson wrote:
On Fri, 22 Jun 2001, JTK wrote:
As for the 4 times, it was stated by somebody in .performance only
a week or so ago to be ~8 times slower [than IE].
Yes. Things are moving fast.
At the speed of light, I'd say! As in three light-YEARS and counting.
I have no
JTK wrote:
DeMoN_LaG wrote:
Valeri Todorov wrote:
Hello,
Huh? You mean where your Favorites are on the left side of the
screen? That's been in IE forever.
Yeah, but the Mozilla Sidebar is MUCH more than just a bookmarks pane. It is
like a secondary mini-browser, displaying a set
JTK wrote:
Ian Hickson wrote:
On Fri, 22 Jun 2001, JTK wrote:
Except 20MB and 8 times slower rendering.
Well, 10MB and 4 times, but who can blame you for exaggerating.
Touche, mon ami. The difference between IE's memory usage and
Mathuzilla's is in fact not ~20MB (that's Maozilla's
JTK wrote:
Ian Hickson wrote:
On Fri, 22 Jun 2001, JTK wrote:
As for the 4 times, it was stated by somebody in .performance only
a week or so ago to be ~8 times slower [than IE].
Yes. Things are moving fast.
At the speed of light, I'd say! As in three light-YEARS and counting.
Do
On Fri, 22 Jun 2001 22:23:08 -0400, DeMoN_LaG
[EMAIL PROTECTED] somehow managed to type:
You must not use Mozilla. It visibly renders the same speed as IE on my
system. Faster on some pages, actually. Usually ones with complex
tables throughout them, and the browser is much more
JTK wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">jesus X wrote:
JTK wrote:
Huh? You mean where your "Favorites" are on the left side of thescreen? That's been in IE forever.
Yeah, but the Mozilla Sidebar is MUCH more than just a bookmarks pane.
No, it's little more, and not
On Fri, 22 Jun 2001, JTK wrote:
Yes. Things are moving fast.
At the speed of light, I'd say! As in three light-YEARS and
counting.
Never mind the dimensional flaw in that statement.
I have no way to directly compare myself, so I can only repeat
what I've heard from others.
On local
Valeri Todorov wrote:
Well, it is same in IE, and I think from IE4 - you may add toolbard and
pannels, which could be anything you want, including another instance of
the browser itself. I think by the time IE4 was out, no one knew what
mozilla is
By the time IE4 was out MOZILLA DIDN'T EXIST
JTK wrote:
At the speed of light, I'd say! As in three light-YEARS and counting.
A light year is not a measurement of time, it is a measurement of distance.
Daily numbers? Sorry Mr. Hickson, .performance often goes *days*
without ANY posts whatsoever! You must be reading off Netscape's
JTK wrote:
No, it's little more, and not executed as well (eg, the IE ones
disappear completely when they're disabled).
No, it's much more. the sidebar can contain almost anything you want to put in
it. It can display RDFs from your favorite sites (sometimes called tickers),
bookmarks, java
On 23 Jun 2001 03:37:05 GMT, Ian Hickson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
somehow managed to type:
As has been mentioned by others in this thread, this statement would
seem to indicate you have misconfigured your browser.
benefit-of-the-doubt
Netnews propagation is inherently unreliable, and JTK doesn't
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], jesus X says...
JTK wrote:
At the speed of light, I'd say! As in three light-YEARS and counting.
A light year is not a measurement of time, it is a measurement of distance.
Thank you, Lord, Mr. Lag, Mr. Hixie, et al, for informing me of a fact which my
six
It's looking pretty polished folks, I suggest you take a look. The
world ain't standing still while Maozilla figues out how to draw
controls inside the lines.
JTK [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
It's looking pretty polished folks, I suggest you take a look. The
world ain't standing still while Maozilla figues out how to draw
controls inside the lines.
Get it where?
Marc Leger wrote:
JTK [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
It's looking pretty polished folks, I suggest you take a look. The
world ain't standing still while Maozilla figues out how to draw
controls inside the lines.
Get it where?
I got
JTK wrote:
Marc Leger wrote:
JTK [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
It's looking pretty polished folks, I suggest you take a look. The
world ain't standing still while Maozilla figues out how to draw
controls inside the lines.
Get it where?
Er, IE6 is just like 5 with some tweaks. Looks like they're standing
still to me ;-)
--Blake
JTK wrote:
It's looking pretty polished folks, I suggest you take a look. The
world ain't standing still while Maozilla figues out how to draw
controls inside the lines.
Ryan Cassin wrote:
[snip]
I couldn't find a single difference between OE5 and OE6 when I last used
OE6.
I'm guessing just under the hood work has gone into OE6.
That's depressing. As far as I can tell, it doesn't need any
under-the-hood work, but could use a little body work.
--
On Thu, 21 Jun 2001, Blake Ross wrote:
Er, IE6 is just like 5 with some tweaks. Looks like they're standing
still to me ;-)
Well, they did add various features that Mozilla had first, like, say, the
sidebar. And some more CSS1 support.
--
Ian Hickson )\
JTK wrote:
Marc Leger wrote:
JTK [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
It's looking pretty polished folks, I suggest you take a look. The
world ain't standing still while Maozilla figues out how to draw
controls inside the lines.
Get it where?
JTK wrote:
Huh? You mean where your Favorites are on the left side of the
screen? That's been in IE forever.
Yeah, but the Mozilla Sidebar is MUCH more than just a bookmarks pane. It is
like a secondary mini-browser, displaying a set of content YOU define with ease.
--
jesus X [
On Thu, 21 Jun 2001, JTK wrote:
Ian Hickson wrote:
On Thu, 21 Jun 2001, Blake Ross wrote:
Er, IE6 is just like 5 with some tweaks. Looks like they're standing
still to me ;-)
Well, they did add various features that Mozilla had first, like, say, the
sidebar.
Huh? You mean
Huh? You mean where your Favorites are on the left side of the
screen? That's been in IE forever.
Yeah, but the Mozilla Sidebar is MUCH more than just a bookmarks pane. It is
like a secondary mini-browser, displaying a set of content YOU define with ease.
Well, it is same in IE, and I
60 matches
Mail list logo
