Re: [MP3 ENCODER] Operating systems - GTK

2000-08-10 Thread Jaroslav Lukesh
| I assume that most users of LAME are using the Linux OS, as the GTK extensions are based around (I believe) X-windows. I don't use Linux, and am stuck with windoze. Are there any utilities around to run the frame analyser with windoze 95, 98 or NT ? | | PS: I know windoze sux, but most of the

Re: [MP3 ENCODER] 16-Bit DOS LAME Binaries

2000-08-10 Thread Jaroslav Lukesh
| Odesílatel: Joshua Bahnsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] | mpxplay is a decent DOS mp3 player. | I was made DOS diskette PC CD-ROM player for family when I"m at work with detachable HDD. And I was try _MANY_ DOS-based MP3 players. Only MPXplay 142 seems to be fully functional for all that I need. And

Re: [MP3 ENCODER] Why no mp1/mp2 files with mpg123?

2000-08-10 Thread Frank Klemm
:: Hi, :: :: The author of CoolPlayer (win32) is considering to put in mpg123 :: instead of the xaudio decoder. http://www.daansystems.com/coolplayer/ :: But be aware: TME (To my ears) mpg123 seems to be broken. Decode a 32 kHz/320 kbps MP3 with lame and with mpg123. :: :: Downside is

Re: [MP3 ENCODER] Operating systems - GTK

2000-08-10 Thread Robert Hegemann
engdev schrieb am Don, 10 Aug 2000: I assume that most users of LAME are using the Linux OS, as the GTK extensions are based around (I believe) X-windows. I don't use Linux, and am stuck with windoze. Are there any utilities around to run the frame analyser with windoze 95, 98 or NT ? PS: I

[MP3 ENCODER] you must include sourcecode when using GPL :(( ? (mpg123)

2000-08-10 Thread Roel VdB
Hi, The author of CoolPlayer (free,win32) is considering to put in mpg123 instead of the xaudio decoder. http://www.daansystems.com/coolplayer/ The only reason that holds him back is that the GPL.txt says he should include his source code with the program. Is there anyone who actually cares

Re: [MP3 ENCODER] you must include sourcecode when using GPL :(( ? (mpg123)

2000-08-10 Thread Monty
The only reason that holds him back is that the GPL.txt says he should include his source code with the program. Is there anyone who actually cares about this? Yes, a *very big* yes. He will incur serious wrath from the open source community if he violates GPL. Any precedents? I mean,

Re: [MP3 ENCODER] you must include sourcecode when using GPL :(( ? (mpg123)

2000-08-10 Thread Smoerk
What, if he makes a seperate plugin? This GPL thing is silly, LGPL is better. But it's the choice of the author of mpg123 and you should respect it. On Thu, 10 Aug 2000 09:24:57 +0200, Roel VdB wrote: Hi, The author of CoolPlayer (free,win32) is considering to put in mpg123 instead of the

Re: [MP3 ENCODER] Why no mp1/mp2 files with mpg123?

2000-08-10 Thread David Balazic
From the mpg123 docs : mpg123 supports all 3 layers, but layer I and II are not very tested. libmpg123 supports layer III only. David Balazic Roel VdB wrote: Hi, The author of CoolPlayer (win32) is considering to put in mpg123 instead of the xaudio decoder.

Re: [MP3 ENCODER] Why no mp1/mp2 files with mpg123?

2000-08-10 Thread David Balazic
David Balazic wrote: From the mpg123 docs : mpg123 supports all 3 layers, but layer I and II are not very tested. libmpg123 supports layer III only. And according to the CHANGES.CVS file on www.mpg123.de layer i/II and VBR will be supported in the lib in the next version 0.59s P.S.:

Re[2]: [MP3 ENCODER] you must include sourcecode when using GPL :(( ? (mpg123)

2000-08-10 Thread Roel VdB
Hello Monty, Thursday, August 10, 2000, 9:48:27 AM, you wrote: The only reason that holds him back is that the GPL.txt says he should include his source code with the program. Is there anyone who actually cares about this? M Yes, a *very big* yes. He will incur serious wrath from the

Re: Re[2]: [MP3 ENCODER] you must include sourcecode when using GPL :(( ? (mpg123)

2000-08-10 Thread Harald Niesche
Maybe he could compile it as a DLL and offer that as a separate decoding engine -- and use that engine (or any other compatible) in his player. If both engines have compatible interfaces and are separate, we'd have a nice decoding engine as DLL *and* a nice MP3 player... Harald - Original

Re: [MP3 ENCODER] Operating systems - GTK

2000-08-10 Thread Mark Taylor
Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2000 10:11:35 +1000 From: engdev [EMAIL PROTECTED] I assume that most users of LAME are using the Linux OS, as the GTK extensions are based around (I believe) X-windows. I don't use Linux, and am stuck with windoze. Are there any utilities around to run the frame

[MP3 ENCODER] Borland C++ compiler

2000-08-10 Thread Magnus Holmgren
Hi, I'm back (since a couple of days), and I've started making a little better makefile (closer to the original) for the free Borland C++ compiler. A few more changes where required this time (when using lame 3.86): * The file "quantize-pvt.c" needs to be called "quantize_pvt.c" - or the

[MP3 ENCODER] no loss ?

2000-08-10 Thread Cavallo de Cavallis
i found this on the net http://www.emagic.de/english/products/software/zap.html what do u think about? Cavallo de Cavallis [EMAIL PROTECTED] =-=--=--=--=--=--=--=--=--=--== = http://www.s0ftpj.org = = Digital Security for y2k = ==-=--=--=--=--=--=--=--=--=-== "Knowledge

Re: [MP3 ENCODER] no loss ?

2000-08-10 Thread Roel VdB
Hello Cavallo, Thursday, August 10, 2000, 8:40:19 PM, you wrote: CdC i found this on the net CdC http://www.emagic.de/english/products/software/zap.html CdC what do u think about? go for the bestfree lossless audio compressor: http://www.monkeysaudio.com/ -- Best regards, Roel

Re: [MP3 ENCODER] you must include sourcecode when using GPL :(( ? (mpg123)

2000-08-10 Thread David Bridson
Hi, The author of CoolPlayer (free,win32) is considering to put in mpg123 instead of the xaudio decoder. http://www.daansystems.com/coolplayer/ The only reason that holds him back is that the GPL.txt says he should include his source code with the program. Actually, I believe that the GPL

Re: [MP3 ENCODER] Borland C++ compiler

2000-08-10 Thread Robert Hegemann
Hi Magnus! Magnus Holmgren schrieb am Don, 10 Aug 2000: By using the fft_FPU_FXCH code, as well as TAKEHIRO_IEEE754_HACK, I managed to get speed to within about 50 percent of the 3.80 DLL I use with CDEx (I've no idea on the options used there). How much of a speed-up could ASM_QUANTIZE

[MP3 ENCODER] Re: you must include sourcecode when using GPL :(( ? (mpg123)

2000-08-10 Thread Takehiro Tominaga
"M" == Monty [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: are there precedents of an piece of GPL upgrading to LGPL? M Sure! I changed all my own stuff from GPL to LGPL last year (I M decided I mostly agreed with Bill Joy ;-). Send the author a M letter; he may be willing. but it is hard

Re: [MP3 ENCODER] no loss ?

2000-08-10 Thread Zia Mazhar
Well, on the features they say "Typical reduction between 20% and 60% "... So I guess it's 'bout the same. Monkey's Audio is more flexible... It's fast, and has got WinAmp plugin. Anyway, a benchmark would be nice to see. - Zia -- MP3 ENCODER mailing list ( http://geek.rcc.se/mp3encoder/ )

Re: [MP3 ENCODER] no loss ?

2000-08-10 Thread James (Jasha) Droppo
I'd guess you'd only get 90% compression on contrived examples. You can, for example, compress a silent audio file with pkzip and get over 90% compression. ... Zia Mazhar writes: Yep, Monkey's Audio is good indeed. However, on the ZAP web site they claim, " The technology behind ZAP simply