Re: [MP3 ENCODER] VBR-speed

2000-01-20 Thread Takehiro Tominaga
"R" == Ross Levis [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Before 3.61 was released there was some writing about faster VBR-performance, is that gone because of the Huffmann-search ? R I thought it was added to CVS but Takehiro has only added it to R his snapshot version. The source is

Re: [MP3 ENCODER] VBR-speed

2000-01-20 Thread Robert Hegemann
Dmitry schrieb am Don, 20 Jan 2000: Hello Peter, Thursday, January 20, 2000, 10:40:33 PM, you wrote: PO I've done some testing on Lame, Mp3Enc31 and BladeEnc, encoding a 262sec. song (45.2Mb). PO I used a 600Mhz pentium III with Win-98, and the EXE from the russian site. PO CBR,

Re: [MP3 ENCODER] VBR-speed

2000-01-20 Thread Dmitry
Hello Peter, Thursday, January 20, 2000, 10:40:33 PM, you wrote: PO I've done some testing on Lame, Mp3Enc31 and BladeEnc, encoding a 262sec. song (45.2Mb). PO I used a 600Mhz pentium III with Win-98, and the EXE from the russian site. PO CBR, high quality (-h / qual 9), full freq. range