Hello Peter,
Thursday, January 20, 2000, 10:40:33 PM, you wrote:
PO> I've done some testing on Lame, Mp3Enc31 and BladeEnc, encoding a 262sec. song
(45.2Mb).
PO> I used a 600Mhz pentium III with Win-98, and the EXE from the russian site.
PO> CBR, high quality (-h / qual 9), full freq. range (-k)
PO> Mp3Enc31 BladeEnc Lame3.61 Lame3.60
PO> 192 (-ms) 586 166 118 60
PO> 128 (-mj) 795 182 163 90
PO> VBR, high quality (-h), full freq. range, -B 320
PO> ~192 (-ms, -V2, -b 128) 651(!) 273
PO> ~128(-mj, -V4, -b 112) 408 193
oops, sorry. it was my small but stupid mistake and now lame3.61 is not
twice slower 3.60.
Best regards,
Dmitry mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
MP3 ENCODER mailing list ( http://geek.rcc.se/mp3encoder/ )
