Re: [MP3 ENCODER] More comments from a recording engineer:

2000-01-23 Thread John Larkin
This is my mail filter. You are receiving this because your mail has come from a suspicious site. This may be a site that offers free e-mail accounts, or has poor, or unenforced acceptable use policies in place. This may also be because your mail had headers that taged it as probable spam.

RE: [MP3 ENCODER] some stupid questions just for your pleasure ^_^

2000-01-23 Thread Ross Levis
Cavallo de Cavallis wrote: Mmm interesting, probably coz more guys are workin patchin and improving it. Yes but Tord is also not altering BladeEnc for quality -- only speed. He makes sure that every update produces exactly the same MP3 file. and looking for somethin near 160 which settings

[MP3 ENCODER] Fraunhofer IIS codec writeup

2000-01-23 Thread Dan Bridges
Saw this posted in the rec.audio.tech NG. Found the HIFi World (UK) URL but they don't have past issues. Can anyone who has read this issue post a synopsis? Cheers, Dan. - anyone knows a good FREE full MP3 encoder ? thanks The Fraunhofer IIS codec got a good writeup in HiFi World

[MP3 ENCODER] Sorry about that...

2000-01-23 Thread John T. Larkin
I hate it when things go wrong while on vacation. Sorry for the excess spam. On Sun, Jan 23, 2000 at 07:22:31PM -0500, Mark Stephens ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote You are sending your mail filter reply to the MP3 encoder list. I am sure we all really appreciate the spam!! mark stephens -- MP3

[MP3 ENCODER] What is going on?

2000-01-23 Thread Joshua Bahnsen
Ok I compiled lame 3.61 with DJGPP and I also compiled it with MSVC++ 5 SP3. I encoded the exact same file with the same options but I usedGNU diff and it said the the files differed. Is this because the DOS version input is handled by libsndfile and the Win32 version is not? Both resulting