Curretly none MP2, only mp3 for home story/music-jukebox.
But If I use in past times, then CoolEdit MPEG plugin that was free
downloadable for cooledit 95 (it is not MP3 plugin). It has two
psychoacoustics models, ATT and NICAM and should save Layer 1 and layer 2
miscelaneous stereo modes and
- Original Message -
From: Ross Levis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 14, 2000 5:46 AM
Subject: Re: [MP3 ENCODER] 32 or 44.1kHz for 128
kbit/sec mp3s fromsoundcard?
"Eric.Howgate" wrote:
Whilst sample rate is up for discussion, -
could
somebody confirm
"Eric.Howgate" wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Ross Levis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 14, 2000 5:46 AM
Subject: Re: [MP3 ENCODER] 32 or 44.1kHz for 128
kbit/sec mp3s fromsoundcard?
"Eric.Howgate" wrote:
Whilst sample rate is up for
| Whilst sample rate is up for discussion, -
| could
| somebody confirm what is the quality of
| broadcast
| FM music is in terms of sample rate ? When
| recording from the radio via line-in Cool Edit
| shows the source as 16 bit stereo @ 32KHz.
|
| It is an analogue (analog for you
Roel VdB wrote:
MP3Enc flattens the sound and the 16kHz region is not at all coded
accurately. Good for lower bitrates, a waste for higher (eg 256S)
http://users.belgacom.net/gc247244/analysis.htm#MP3ENC31
is a test I did a while back.
mp3enc cutoff is 16 kHz only for low bitrates; it
Mark Taylor wrote:
I just took a look at this code, and it looks like
"noise_shaping_stop" is never used.
Robert modifed outer_loop so that:
with -X0: it will stop the iteration as soon as it
gets a value of over= 0 (all noise allowed noise)
with other -X options, it will stop with
Mark Taylor wrote:
Ok, I just made that change. So do you like -X2 or -X3
better than the default?
Well, I actually use -X6, which is based on over_avg_noise;
the change for summing energy instead of dB also applies to this
version. The following code shows this for the long block
case (the
On Tue, Jul 11, 2000 at 08:36:44AM -0400, Greg Maxwell wrote:
After spending about $100(us) on a pair of Grado SR80s, my 'tolerable'
collection of 30+gigs of 192Kbit/sec bladeenc encoded mp3s sounded so
digusting that I rm -Rfed the whole lot of them. (To be recompressed as
Vorbis files).
Aw
Hello everyone,
I'm looking for a win32 compiled binary in which ogg support is
enabled. So far I haven't found one - links, anyone?
BTW: there's a small "typo" in the USAGE file; the explanation for the
--ogginput switch is also found in the --ogg section... :-)
Regards,
Holger
--
Thanks to all who offered advice
Eric
--
MP3 ENCODER mailing list ( http://geek.rcc.se/mp3encoder/ )
Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2000 14:37:35 -0700
From: "Chris Haynes" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
We know that LAME now has roughly the same quality of MP3Enc 3.1. But,
as far as I am concerned, full huffman search hasn't been implemented
on LAME yet. I've noticed LAME 3.8x produces better quality than 3.70,
I've got another question, and I thought it'd be better to start a new
thread with it. There are some controversy with the quality and bugs
of LAME VBR mode. Would this affect the ABR mode, too? Which is safer
to use (though ABR is called the "safe VBR mode!): 192 CBR or 192 ABR?
Can I
12 matches
Mail list logo