Hi,
Thanks for the reply. and i want to know more details about that
normalization process. I want to know where exactly they are doing
that normalization. can someone tell me where can i get all these
details.
It will be really helpful for me, if somebody explain abt this
On Fri, 2005-04-29 at 02:42 -0400, Jack Nguy wrote:
Hey Gavin,
I was reading up on your post of the lame mailing list. I was
wondering if you still have that script that copies over the ID3v2s of
mp3s when downsampling. Thanks
Jack Nguy.
This is a link to the last posting on the mailing
Giancarlo Vercellesi wrote:
A simple question about MP3 license.
If someone use LAME (a free MP3 encoder) to stream MP3 over Internet (or to
storage on disk)
for commercial market (also suppose to take more than $100,000), he/she must
pay a royalty to Fraunhofer-Thomson?
Yes. The encoder used is
Monty wrote:
If you use the encoder, you must have purchased a patent license
period. Of course, MPEG isn;t going to concern itself with
individuals. If you do it in the name of NPR, you really really need
to have a real license :-)
Sorry Monty, but if someone is using an encoder for the sole
On Thu, 6 May 2004 15:21:57 -0400
Robert Holt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello:
I scoured the net for the answer to this question, and I couldn't find it.
I found your name on the lame sourceforge site.
I work for National Public Radio, a non-profit radio network. We'd like to
use the
On Fri, May 07, 2004 at 11:20:14AM +0200, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
On Thu, 6 May 2004 15:21:57 -0400
Robert Holt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello:
I scoured the net for the answer to this question, and I couldn't find it.
I found your name on the lame sourceforge site.
I
Vijayasaradhi D. wrote:
I know that LAME used its own Psychoacoustic model. I am trying to
understand different psychoacoustic models..like in 11172-3 Psycho1 ,
Psycho 2..etc.
Where do I can get document describing LAME Psychoacoustic model.
The psychoacoustic models are not very documented,
Fred Nevez wrote:
Men i do not understand , why do not do like everyone , buy yourself a
computer ??
We already have computers.
i'm without job , and only try to help , i really do not see any point
why i would buy a computer only for a codec
We do not see any point either about why
I let Gabriel or someone else comment on that as I definitively can't
help on the ACM part. Maybe he can provide you with some kind of a
debugging version of the ACM to find the cause of the problem.
i'll continue to use the old radium codec :/
i was thinking the lame dev team would be proud to
- Original Message -
From: Kristian Hermansen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, February 02, 2004 10:45 PM
Subject: [mp3encoder] Re: LAME: Problem encoding some files... (last week)
Sorry about delay - my last post was rejected by the moderator due to
attachment
Sorry about delay - my last post was rejected by the moderator due to
attachment files of the screenshot errors. They are now on my FTP server
for review:
--snip--
Run Lame.exe in console mode to see its version (it should look like 3.95 or
so)
The latest version I know of is 3.96 alpha.
Michelangelo Nottoli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
#if defined(__unix__) || defined(__sun__)
...call fopen64
#else
..call fopen
#endif
This is unreliable, because __unix__ may not always be defined,
and __sun__ includes older (32-bit only) versions of Solaris as
well as the old SunOS 4.x.
On Mon, 02 Jun 2003 13:09:48 -0700
Greg Hazel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry to bother you, but I wasn't sure who else to contact.
Try the MP3 Encoder list (CCed).
I've been trying, but don't really understand enough to rip out
the right pieces of LAME for this task:
Take an MP3 file with
Alexander Leidinger wrote:
I've been trying, but don't really understand enough to rip out
the right pieces of LAME for this task:
Take an MP3 file with CRC turned on, but incorrect
checksum information and either disable CRC or recompute
the checksums correctly, and make the changes without
14 matches
Mail list logo
