Hello,
I recently downloaded the tinyos 2.x XubunTOS live CD and installed it.
Which
uses the mspgcc tool chain. I got jtag from the stanford repository.
(msp430tools-jtag-lib-tinyos)
and (msp430tools-python-tools-tinyos).
It installed okay and I built Blink (one of the tinyOS demo programs).
Does msp430-gdbproxy support the usb jtag pod?
thanks,
eric
A few questions...
1) what msp430-gdbproxy do I need to debug using a USB JTAG FET?
2) on the usb bus how does the USB JTAG FET show up? (ie lsusb)
3) Is any one using the Olimex usb jtag dongle with mspgcc for the msp430?
4) what is the command string fed to msp430-gdbproxy when using the ti
Hello,
I just got a TI USB Jtag (msp-fet430uif) debugging interface to replace an
old parallel port
one. The kernel is finding it but no /dev/ttyUSB* device file is being
created.
Any thoughts? Anyone know what error -5 coming from the device driver means
(ti_usb_3410_5052: probe of 1-1:1.0
of the binary
versiion
of the proprietary stuff to generate a working library that we can then use
on the Mac.
Can some help?
thanks,
eric decker
autonomous systems lab
ucsc
Does anyone have a pointer to prebuilt packages for Hardy?
eric
--
Eric B. Decker
Senior (over 50 :-) Researcher
Autonomous Systems Lab
Jack Baskin School of Engineering
UCSC
time now and just want to check
whether you got my mail with the header files.
No need to hurry, I just want to be sure you got the files.
JMGross
- Ursprüngliche Nachricht -
Von: Eric Decker
An: msp...@grossibaer.de
Gesendet am: 15 Okt 2009 20:42:48
Betreff: mspgcc msp430 5438
We recently switched to the msp430f2618 from a msp430f1611 and on boot up I
noticed that DCOCTL was getting zero'd. This occured when I set SVSCTL=0.
On further investigation, I noticed that SVSCTL and DCOCTL were both being
set to 0x56. I tracked this down to msp430/include/msp430x261x.h which
Hi Daniel,
mspdebug 0.10 has a db entry for the msp430f2616 but I have a msp430f2618
that isn't recognized by mspdebug. I initially tried --fet-force-id
msp430f2616 but that didn't work. So I then tried to duplicate the
procedure to list the msg28_data that Andres Vahter used
On Tue, Aug
first time I wrote daniels address wrong
Hi Daniel,
mspdebug 0.10 has a db entry for the msp430f2616 but I have a msp430f2618
that isn't recognized by mspdebug. I initially tried --fet-force-id
msp430f2616 but that didn't work. So I then tried to duplicate the
procedure to list the msg28_data
Hi,
I'm trying to figure out how to make sense of the different msp430 DMA
engines and the way the TI headers (from mspgcc4, Peter Bigot) describe what
is there.
First, here is what I understand about the hardware:
I believe the difference can be distilled down to the following:
SA/DA address
On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 3:22 PM, Peter Bigot big...@acm.org wrote:
In addition to SF bug 3168453 which notes that the prototype for
__get_frame_address() in msp430-libc is wrong (and has been for years)
resulting in a reference to a non-existent external function, SF 3198920
documents that the
I concur with Crazy Casta.
I think we should adhear to the principle of least surprise. What will
most people see
if we enable the WDT by default and something goes wrong. How long will it
take them
to figure out what is happening
So I think leaving the WDT function disabled by default
Hi,
I know what Read-Modify-Write means. At least in the context of non-TI
processors. :-)
I've designed and debugged full blown multiprocessors with nasty snooping
caches.
cache coherency is always entertaining.
Now in the DMA machine for the CC430f5137 and msp430f5438 there is mention
of a
On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 8:43 PM, Steve Underwood ste...@coppice.org wrote:
A large part of the MSP430 instruction set is read-modify-write. How do
you think all those memory to memory operations work?
Ah. I guess I got taken in by TI calling the MSP430 a RISC machine. Silly
me.
Thanks
: Eric Decker
Gesendet am: 05 Apr 2011 03:14:40
I know what Read-Modify-Write means. At least in the context of non-TI
processors. :-)
I've designed and debugged full blown multiprocessors with nasty snooping
caches.
cache coherency is always entertaining.
The MSP does not have any
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 6:58 AM, Grant Edwards grant.b.edwa...@gmail.comwrote:
On 2011-04-05, Eric Decker cire...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 8:43 PM, Steve Underwood ste...@coppice.org
wrote:
A large part of the MSP430 instruction set is read-modify-write. How do
you think
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 7:24 AM, Peter Bigot big...@acm.org wrote:
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 9:12 AM, Eric Decker cire...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 6:58 AM, Grant Edwards grant.b.edwa...@gmail.com
wrote:
Ah. I guess I got taken in by TI calling the MSP430 a RISC machine.
Yea
Hi,
1st before anything else... Is there a reasonable way to search the
mspgcc-users archive?
I've poked around a bit and doesn't seem to be.
I'm playing with the dma engines on the msp430f2617. I've written a unified
driver that
handles all three main processor varients. (x1: msp430f1611,
information about the behavior of 20 bit registers. and I'm
talking about the 2617 processor. although I'm also interested in any
information about the cc430f5137 and/or the 5438.
Peter
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 8:18 AM, Eric Decker cire...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
1st before anything else
,
0x001d2;#0x0fefe
Can the msp430X instruction set even access a 20 bit immediate field?
Or do I have to initialize a long in memory first then load it using movx.a?
eric
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 12:23 PM, JMGross msp...@grossibaer.de wrote:
- Ursprüngliche Nachricht -
Von: Eric Decker
On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 5:25 PM, Eric Decker cire...@gmail.com wrote:
Anyone know how to get 20 bit immediate in gcc extended asm?
ie.
__asm__ __volatile__ (movx.a %1,%0:=m (DMA0SA):i (0xefefeUL));
which unfortunately generates...
__asm__ __volatile__ (movx.a %1,%0:=m
On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 4:21 PM, Peter Bigot big...@acm.org wrote:
And yes, if you did it in assembler, you could use a 20-bit immediate.
Peter
Can the msp430X instruction set even access a 20 bit immediate field?
This is kind of what I was getting at
From my original post:
thanks. appreciated.
On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 7:12 AM, JMGross msp...@grossibaer.de wrote:
- Ursprüngliche Nachricht -
Von: Eric Decker
Gesendet am: 15 Apr 2011 05:38:43
I know uniarch currently doesn't support 20 bit. That is why I'm
using 3.2.3 with the z1 mods
I've been using the GDB from the previous builds that Peter was doing before
uniarch.
Its GDB 7.2 from mspgcc 4.4.5. Download from
Mspgcc4/Sourceforgehttp://sourceforge.net/projects/mspgcc4/files/mspgcc4/.
The file you want is mspgcc4-201103112.zip.
Unpack it and follow the instructions.
msp430-gdbproxy hasn't been supported for a long time.
you can try porting mspdebug to the windows/cygwin environment. I don't
know what is required, prehaps a port of libusb.
or
you can switch to a linux environment, perhaps dual boot.
sorry that there isn't a better answer.
I started my
.
So you should explicitely disable the FLL before entering any LPM except
LPM0, and only re-enable it if you remain in active mode for more than 2 or 3
reference ticks.
JMGross
- Ursprüngliche Nachricht -
Von: Eric Decker
An: JMGross
Gesendet am: 07 Aug 2011 07:22:53
On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 10:57 PM, Alex Stefan
alexandru.ste...@cloudbit.rowrote:
As I said, seems like a very good idea, but there's one thing I don't
understand. Why do you need the 'indirect jumping zone'. Why wouldn't it be
possible to program the vector in bootvect to jump directly to the
I don't know what the C++ code looks like after the compiler gets done with
it.
But...
You should be able to generate a listing from the object that includes the
underlying assembly language. I don't know how ugly the constructors and
destructors are but you should be able to figure out where
I've put together a revised version of LTS 20110716 with the patches through
20110813 from Peter's releases.
It is located as a tar ball at:
http://tinyprod.net/downloads/msp430-20110813.tgz
It gets installed in /opt. It has been built for Ubuntu Lucid (10.04) and
also needs to have libmpc-dev
there is an experimental debian archive at
http://tinyprod.net/debian-dev/
This is based on debian squeeze so should work fine on Ubuntu 11.04
I don't know what 2.21.1a or 7.2a are. Those seem kind of odd. Where are
your references coming from?
More context would be nice.
eric
On Sun,
1cxx etc is ram. and for some reason gdb is thinking that it is down in
ram which is probably where it ends up.
Not sure what is different in the elf file you are feeding into gdb. Which
gdb by the way.
it would help more if you include things like what gdb, what toolchain,
versions, etc.
wrote:
30.08.2011 12:32, Eric Decker пишет:
1cxx etc is ram. and for some reason gdb is thinking that it is down
in
ram which is probably where it ends up.
Not sure what is different in the elf file you are feeding into gdb.
Which
gdb by the way.
Hi, Eric!
I'm using latest
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 2:06 AM, aliko ali.tli...@gmail.com wrote:
30.08.2011 12:54, Eric Decker пишет:
we need more details about the compile process, turn on verbose and see
what switches are being fed to the compiler and linker.
compiller (for one of files in project):
msp430-g++ -c
this one of
my early builds
Michel please try ag
From cPhone
On Sep 14, 2011, at 8:01 AM, Peter Bigot big...@acm.org wrote:
Interesting. I'll have to figure out where that extra information is
getting added; when I do that on one of my internal builds, I just get 4.5.3
with no
Michel please try again but use one of the more current builds from
http://tinyprod.net/razvanm/debian
From cPhone
On Sep 14, 2011, at 8:01 AM, Peter Bigot big...@acm.org wrote:
Interesting. I'll have to figure out where that extra information is
getting added; when I do that on one of my
that is one way of doing it but I don't think it is required.
What I beleive is required is that you tell the linker about the mcu. I
beleive there is a way of doing this directly to the linker but I don't
recall the syntax.
The mechanism Matthias is using certainly works to tell the linker
Harumph. I'm not sure where to point you. I learned about this stuff in
basic computer science classes and/or on the fly.
The major question is where to data variables live
1st there is registers (clearly local scope)
next up is the stack. This depends on the architecture of the
Hey Jasper,
Thanks for the find.
Here is the situation
First, these files come directly from TI and for maintanence and sanity
reasons we don't want to modify them. There is a very simple mod done at
the very front which adds the define for TI_HEADERS. Peter takes care of
that. And he
On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 2:03 AM, David Brown da...@westcontrol.com wrote:
On 05/10/2011 18:05, JMGross wrote:
- Ursprüngliche Nachricht -
Von: David Brown
Gesendet am: 04 Okt 2011 16:22:18
On 04/10/2011 15:59, Peter Bigot wrote:
The words stack and heap do not appear
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 3:12 PM, Wayne Uroda wayne.ur...@grabba.com wrote:
I have a couple of stupid questions:
1. Is there any way to search the mspgcc-users mail archive on sourceforge?
(I may not have needed to ask question 2).
I'm not aware of a device support list.
However, I know that the CC430f5137 is definitely supported as are the
5438a
The intent is to support any device that we have cpu headers for. But I
don't know if that means the goal was accomplished. The proof is in the
actual code generated and
it would be better to figure out why disabling around the hw output makes a
difference.
you really shouldn't have to do that. some other piece of code must be
mucking with the uart I/o
the other more efficient way to mess with this is to go buffered and run the
I/O off interrupts.
something like
READ_SR() GIE
From cPhone
On Nov 16, 2011, at 6:28 PM, Sergio Campamá scamp...@ing.puc.cl wrote:
Umm, what would be the proper way to check the GIE bit from the SR?
Something like _BIS_SR(GIE), but not to set, just to read the SR...
On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 11:06 PM, Kuba kubaraczkow...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Daniel,
Thanks for the info. That sounds a bit better than the chip replacement
(though I will try that if nothing else works, thanks Crazy Casta).
Did you come across an instruction to follow this procedure? Can it
On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 11:34 PM, Kuba kubaraczkow...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear Eric, Daniel,
I see. Indeed if the INFO section contains only useful data and not
critical data, then I can safely erase the device.
Not silly at all. How many of us have bricked a device accidentally.
On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 4:05 PM, Sergio Campamá scamp...@ing.puc.cl wrote:
Hello Wayne,
The only difference between LPM3 and LPM4 is that the ACLK is stopped in
LPM4, so moving onto LPM3 won't solve your problem. What is the P1.1
connected to? If you wanted to wake the system up from LPM4
Howdy Bob,
When messing with low level stuff (like interrupts) one must learn to read
and deal with TI's weird interrupt schemes.
One can learn all from looking at the include files: These files can be
found in /usr/msp430/include with a normal install from one of the Debian
packages
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 4:01 PM, Wayne Uroda wayne.ur...@grabba.com wrote:
Hi Peter,
Regarding your first comment, are you saying that while I can put a
definite lower bound on stack usage (stack uses at least X bytes), I cannot
put a definite upper bound on stack use (stack never uses more
mspdebug
See: http://mspdebug.sourceforge.net/
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 1:44 AM, Ori Idan o...@helicontech.co.il wrote:
I need to program a MSP430 device using Linux.
I do not need debugging, just send an existing .hex file to the device and
program it's flash.
What is the best tool,
.
there is the TI-FET MSP-FETU430IF.
there is the OLIMEX tinyusb
there is the goodfet.
various levels of cost.
--
Ori Idan
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 12:46 PM, Eric Decker cire...@gmail.com wrote:
mspdebug
See: http://mspdebug.sourceforge.net/
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 1:44 AM, Ori Idan
...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, February 10, 2012 12:14 AM
To: Mspgcc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Mspgcc-users] Programming MSP430 under Linux
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 6:58 AM, Eric Decker cire...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 3:00 AM, Ori Idan o...@helicontech.co.il wrote
Since the op didn't mention which MSP430 chip he was using, you might
also mention the $4.30 LaunchPad. The LaunchPad will directly program
any MSP430 chip in a 14 or 20-pin DIP package that supports
Spy-Bi-Wire. It should also be able to program other chips externally
via a jury-rigged
30, 2012 at 6:58 AM, Eric Decker cire...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 3:00 AM, Ori Idan o...@helicontech.co.il
wrote:
Thank you very much.
What about hardware tools, is the only option is TI-FET or there are
other
less expensive ones that work with USB
...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, February 10, 2012 12:14 AM
To: Mspgcc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Mspgcc-users] Programming MSP430 under Linux
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 6:58 AM, Eric Decker cire...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 3:00 AM, Ori Idan o...@helicontech.co.il
the form msp430x1611 has been removed. Peter clearly documented this on this
list. There are very good reasons for the removal.
you need to use -mmcu=msp430f1611
From cPhone
On Feb 29, 2012, at 3:04 AM, Stefan Nürnberger s...@zelle79.org wrote:
You could try to pass the full
What is the version of gcc that you are using to build with?
version numbers of your host toolchain would be helpful.
On Sat, Apr 7, 2012 at 2:38 PM, Lev Serebryakov l...@serebryakov.spb.ruwrote:
Hello, MSPGCC.
Maybe, it is not proper list to ask. But gcc-specific lists are very
noisy and
I have a script that builds deb packages if that helps.
On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 2:06 PM, Peter Bigot big...@acm.org wrote:
On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 2:47 PM, Matthias Ringwald matth...@ringwald.ch
wrote:
Hello Peter
could you please provide a tar.gz of ..
The tag
I don't see a patch bundle for 20120514 at DEVEL-4.7.x. Last patch bundle
I see still remains 20120425.
Am I looking in the wrong place?
eric
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 7:12 PM, Peter Bigot big...@acm.org wrote:
Development release 20120514 of mspgcc is now available.
This is a development
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 12:56 AM, Hans Henry von Tresckow
hvont...@gmail.com wrote:
Is there any timeline for updated debian or Ubuntu packages based on
the current LTS Relaease?
The packages available out there are still based on the old 20110612
release.
Out where?
You can find all
It would be more helpful if you tell us what version of the toolchain you
are running...
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 1:39 AM, Simeon Felis simeon.fe...@hs-regensburg.de
wrote:
According to [1] page 12 the f1612 has 55k rom. But the
msp430/lib/ldscripts/msp430f1612/memory.x
indicates that it has
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 4:53 PM, Simeon Felis simeon.fe...@hs-regensburg.de
wrote:
The linker script appears consistent with the device datasheet at
http://www.ti.com/product/msp430f1612; see page 15. The device does
not have 55 kiB ROM; that's been rounded up by 256 bytes.
That was
I would like us to move towards less obfuscation.
my $0.02CDN
On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 4:01 AM, JMGross msp...@grossibaer.de wrote:
- Ursprüngliche Nachricht -
Von: Peter Bigot
Gesendet am: 27 Jun 2012 16:36:58
P.s.: I also wish all this TIMER1_VECTOR/TIMER0_A1_VECTOR
confusion
to further expound on what Peter has said.
I would paraphrase it as follows: If an underlying implementation
provides time services, then it is higly desireable that the api for those
services looke like the POSIX time functions and can be provided by libc.
The fix makes sure that is is
On Sun, Jul 22, 2012 at 2:03 PM, Kuba kubaraczkow...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear Peter,
Thank you for your answer. I do understand that my question only touches
mspgcc toolchain, however I decided to give it a try since people reading
this list have also quite some toolset knowledge.
Thank you
Doesn't matter. mspgcc is os agnostic.
i would use either 11.10 or 12.04
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 9:54 PM, kudiarasu murugesan
kudiara...@apexcomtel.com wrote:
Hi all
I am newbee to msp430, i setup development environment and myself willing
to use open source (mspgcc and eclipse ). Any
tilib to work.
On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 3:43 AM, kudiarasu kudiyara...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi eric,
ya i don't have V2 FET f/w , where i can get this?
On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 1:15 AM, Eric Decker cire...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 10:25 AM, kudiarasu kudiyara...@gmail.comwrote
, Aug 18, 2012 at 4:16 PM, Eric Decker cire...@gmail.com wrote:
don't know. I bought mine years ago.
I strongly suspect that you can only buy v3 fets these days.
you can try asking TI for an older copy of the f/w. I'd send you what I
have but don't want to run afoul of the copyright gods
, 2012 at 5:38 PM, Eric Decker cire...@gmail.com wrote:
try
mspdebug uif -jd /dev/ttyUSB0
From cPhone
On Aug 18, 2012, at 4:52 AM, kudiarasu kudiyara...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Eric
i downgraded sucessfully with the help of ccsv5 installed windows PC
Programs
- Texas Instruments
On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 11:08 PM, Yamandu Ploskonka yamap...@gmail.comwrote:
Question: any ideas on a simple OS that would fit in a USB and have the
basic MSP toolchain?
A bit beyond the scope of this list.
I did a simple search on google running linux from usb, First page
On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 11:57 PM, Yamandu Ploskonka yamap...@gmail.comwrote:
On 08/20/2012 01:47 AM, Eric Decker wrote:
On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 11:08 PM, Yamandu Ploskonka
yamap...@gmail.commailto:
yamap...@gmail.com wrote:
Question: any ideas on a simple OS that would fit in a USB
Segmentation fault
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 11:54 AM, Eric Decker cire...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 10:37 PM, kudiarasu kudiyara...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi Eric,
Successful installation of mspdebug, I am facing problem in msp430-gdb
installation
please find my logs here
I
Couple of things.
First when sending source do it as an attachment so it doesn't get mangled.
lose the #include msp430g2231.h and replace it with #include msp430.h
See if that helps.
The command line will cause the right thing to happen when you say
-mmcu=msp430g2231.
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 11:14 PM, mind entropy mindentr...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi,
I was reading the mspgcc manual (
http://www.eecs.harvard.edu/~konrad/projects/motetrack/mspgcc-manual-20031127.pdf
)
and on Pg 39 its written as
I believe there is a more up to date version but I'm not usre
On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 12:38 AM, mind entropy mindentr...@gmail.comwrote:
On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 12:36 PM, Eric Decker cire...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 11:14 PM, mind entropy mindentr...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi,
I was reading the mspgcc manual (
http
One of the outstanding issues with the current 20 bit msp430-gcc is
msp430-gdb doesn't understand enough to work properly. msp430-gdb should
also be mutated forward to be based on a more modern gdb. Currently we've
been using 7.2 with the 4.6.3 msp430-gcc toolchain.
Eventually, I hope to take
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 6:58 PM, Chris Liechti cliec...@gmx.net wrote:
Am 12.03.2013 00:31, schrieb Nils Faerber:
Then I extended my testcode with some SPI init code, a ~1kbyte buffer in
RAM and a polling SPI write of that buffer to the SPI - BANG!
so without knowing details, two possible
Haven't seen any update yet.
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 2:42 PM, Stefano Bocchino
bocchino.stef...@gmail.com wrote:
I haven't seen any status update, initial beta or public code branch
since the original announce (if patches have been scattered across
several trackers, I may simply have
On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 3:30 PM, garyr ga...@fidalgo.net wrote:
I'm trying to switch to the latest version of the mspgcc tools. I've
downloaded
the latest version from sourceforge. When I attempt to compile a file I
get the
following warning message:
c:\program
Hi Bill,
Eric here.
That is the current non-experimental version and should work. It is the
most recent primary version. It support the CPUX cpus just not the 20 bit
extensions.
There is also an experimental version 4.7 that has 20 bit support.
If you give me more information about what you
yeah that looks weird.
I don't know how much testing -mcpu=430 has had done on it.
All of the testing I've seen and have used myself uses -mmcu=mcu spec ie.
ie
-mmcu=msp430f1611
or
-mmcu=msp430f2618
or
-mmcu=msp430f5438a
If that help, submit a bug report and see what Peter says
can you make it generally available?
if not can you send it to me too?
thanks
From cPhone
On Mar 30, 2013, at 2:43 PM, garyr ga...@fidalgo.net wrote:
I could send you some assembler code I've written; some serial I/O stuff.
Would
that be of interest?
- Original Message -
is there some reason you are using msp430-gdbproxy rather than mspdebug?
msp430-gdbproxy has been deprecated for many years now.
current devlopment is occuring on mspdebug.
it is a superset of msp430-gdbproxy.
On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 6:16 PM, Andrew McLaren and...@aratika.co.nzwrote:
I've
have you verified that the board is getting the voltage that you think it
should be?
On Mon, Sep 2, 2013 at 3:38 PM, Andrew McLaren and...@aratika.co.nz wrote:
On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 10:40:45AM +1200, Andrew McLaren wrote:
It would have been easy if the problem had been gdbproxy,
but
Okay I'll ask... Is there FORTRAN support?
Now on to my real question...
how much real world testing has been done? Has the output been put onto
real msp430 chips?
Or are you testing against the test suites?
just wondering how much it has been banged on.
Is it Alpha/Beta status?
I
I don't think this is the same but try this patch:….
+++ a/bfd/elf32-msp430.c 2013-07-24 23:48:07.731767510 -0700
--- b/bfd/elf32-msp430.c 2013-07-24 23:54:57.073797079 -0700
@@ -27,6 +27,7 @@
#include elf-bfd.h
#include elf/msp430.h
#include assert.h
+#include string.h
/* Use RELA instead
it is gdb_loop not gdb-loop under vs. dash.
ouch.
took me a while to see it.
On Sun, Nov 3, 2013 at 7:21 PM, Andrew McLaren and...@aratika.co.nz wrote:
I'm running Mspdebug outboard of Eclipse. In the old gdbproxy, once I set
this listening on its input port, it remained active until
hi Daniel
is it possible to use the
ver 3 firmware with Linux dev boxes
From cPhone
On Nov 24, 2013, at 5:22 PM, Daniel Beer dlb...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Nov 23, 2013 at 01:20:02PM -0800, garyr wrote:
My OS is XP, Im using the FET430UIF. I've installed MSPDebug according to the
no
they are supported in the experimental 4.7 but it is unsupported
From cPhone
On Apr 21, 2014, at 2:26 PM, Tomek Lorek tlo...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I'm facing problems with accessing flash at its 20-bit addressed
regions. While looking for the solution I stumbled upon this website
look at the actual code generated
see what the difference in the actual code is
From cPhone
On May 4, 2014, at 1:14 PM, Tomek Lorek tlo...@gmail.com wrote:
2014-05-04 22:04 GMT+02:00 Tomek Lorek tlo...@gmail.com:
1. Possibly the main reason my code did not work was using
__asm__
the gdb that is part of 4.7 doesn't work
changes for 20 bit gdb for the msp430 haven't been done (for the 4.7 toolchain)
the new tool chain that redhat/ti is working on maybe more functional but I
haven't checked it out yet
From cPhone
On May 12, 2014, at 7:49 AM, Dockter, Michael
CCS is Code Composer Studio which is basically a gui front end to the gcc
toolchain.
Devaiah, there should be a way to examine the logs to see exactly what
command lines and switches are being generated to the toolchain when it
gets invoked by CCS.
You'll have to figure out how to go see those
I haven't seen any thing that describes the internal architecture of the
MSP430. And I've looked.
Sorry.
On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 8:36 PM, Jose Luis Honorato L.
joseluishonor...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
An e-mail from Peter a few days ago hinted the existence of an instruction
pipeline in
these days we use mspdebug
msp430-jtag hasn't been supported for years
On Tuesday, June 24, 2014, Pedro Helou helou.pe...@gmail.com wrote:
-- Forwarded message --
From: Pedro Helou helou.pe...@gmail.com javascript:;
Date: 2014-06-24 10:24 GMT+02:00
Subject: flash code with
where did you get the code from? the mspgcc
I've used the packages from tinyprod.net/repos/debian/msp430-46 for years
now and have been able using mspdebug to debug msp430f5438a processors
using single step and upto 8 breakpoints using a TI MSP430 UIF jtag
debugging pod.
On Fri, Jul 18, 2014
have you tried, -g -Os
or -ggdb -Os
that is what I use to debug size optimized code.
works fine.
figuring out what the code is doing can be a bit tricky but it can be done.
On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 9:10 PM, Arvind Padmanabhan
arvindpadmanab...@yahoo.com.sg wrote:
Hi Folks,
My friend has
Table 21 on pg 53 is confusing. There are two columns, P2SEL.6/P2SEL.7 and
P2SEL2.6/P2SEL2.7. I have no idea what the P2SEL2.6/P2SEL2.7 column is
referring to (and it has the opposite value of P2SEL.6/P2SEL.7.
Same table says that for Capative Sensing P2SEL2.6 is a 1. Not sure where
that gets
97 matches
Mail list logo
