[mssms] RE: Intel NUC's Using Same WMIC Model Entry

What about win32_computersystemproduct? Daniel Ratliff From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Chris Carbone Sent: Tuesday, May 2, 2017 3:57 PM To: 'mssms@lists.myitforum.com' Subject: [mssms] RE: Intel NUC's Using

[mssms] RE: Proxy Management Point and Boundary behavior post 1610

> “I’ve been told by our network folks that the clients are all going up to our > primary MP UNLESS we add the proxy management point – secondary site – within > the boundary group.” Correct. Clients use a secondary site based upon content location boundary groups:

[mssms] RE: Proxy Management Point and Boundary behavior post 1610

The more I think about this the more I think it makes no sense. IF you have a server for a region – Say east coast for example with 15000 systems spread across an area. You have the MP role and DP role – There is no way to have all the systems across many areas or wans use that MP but hit

[mssms] RE: Intel NUC's Using Same WMIC Model Entry

This is the query I have for the Intel NUC's on the driver package step. SELECT * FROM Win32_ComputerSystem WHERE Model LIKE "%Nobilis%" From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Daniel Ratliff Sent: Tuesday, May 02, 2017 12:41 PM To:

Re: [mssms] System Center Endpoint Protection

This is what I have: [image: Inline image 1] What is your Sync Schedule for your ADR, and what is the Sync Schedule for your SUP? On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 1:41 PM, Kevin Ray wrote: > While creating the ADR choosen below products .Any thing wrong ? > > Forefront

[mssms] RE: Intel NUC's Using Same WMIC Model Entry

Are you looking at win32_computer_system and win32_computer_system_product? Daniel Ratliff From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Chris Carbone Sent: Tuesday, May 2, 2017 12:57 PM To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: [mssms] Intel NUC's Using

[mssms] Intel NUC's Using Same WMIC Model Entry

Hello All, I have a new situation with the newer model Intel NUC's. Normally in an OSD task sequence I would use a WMI Query for the model. For the Intel NUC's it comes back as "Nobilis". Intel is still using that same model "Nobilis" in their newer NUC's so now when I run OSD on any NUC's,

[mssms] RE: Proxy Management Point and Boundary behavior post 1610

Short term I had to go to my boundary group for my secondary site and I added all those subnets. This will likely mean all my regional boxes will end up also using it as a DP unfortunately Unless the clients somehow know to use the other boundary group DP they are assigned to because of the

[mssms] Proxy Management Point and Boundary behavior post 1610

Hi, We upgraded from 1606 to 1610 to 1702 and trying to get a handle on the boundary changes. I’ve been told by our network folks that the clients are all going up to our primary MP UNLESS we add the proxy management point – secondary site – within the boundary group. We wanted to have

[mssms] RE: Android for Work / Intune Hybrid

Haha, yeah. We were very anxious for AfW and wanted to get all of our Android devices out of Good and into Intune so we immediately upgraded to 1702 when it came out. We're very close to dropping AfW and just going with regular Android enrollments now though. Still no luck finding a resource at

RE: [mssms] Creating a MOF change causing issue - CM1606 / SQL 2012

Thanks Sherry From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Sherry Kissinger Sent: Tuesday, May 02, 2017 8:30 AM To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: Re: [mssms] Creating a MOF change causing issue - CM1606 / SQL 2012 Well... it works fine. I

RE: [mssms] Creating a MOF change causing issue - CM1606 / SQL 2012

Ok I removed it and the errors are gone now And this is happening in our DEV Lab! ;) From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Sherry Kissinger Sent: Tuesday, May 02, 2017 8:18 AM To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: Re: [mssms] Creating a

Re: [mssms] Creating a MOF change causing issue - CM1606 / SQL 2012

Well... it works fine. I added the snippet in my lab to configuration.mof: no errors at all. Waited a few minutes (no errors) and imported the other snippet into default client settings. It was just fine as well, no errors at all. If removing the section from your configuration.mof (or

Re: [mssms] Creating a MOF change causing issue - CM1606 / SQL 2012

Yeah, I'd remove the new section from configuration.mof; (or grab a backup copy of configuration.mof from installedlocation\data\hinvarchive and put it back), just to be sure that error stops happening when you do. I'll fire up my lab and see what happens when I dump that mof edit into my lab. I

[mssms] RE: Upgrade Readiness with System Center Configuration Manager

Just to let you all know we have successfully implemented Upgrade Readiness with System Center Configuration Manager. The documentation is not great (hasn't been updated to reflect recent changes) and there doesn't seem to be a single end-to-end document from Microsoft, but we found a great

RE: [mssms] Creating a MOF change causing issue - CM1606 / SQL 2012

Hi Sherry For whatever reason, when I added it to the bottom of the Configuration.mof and watched the Dataldr.log – that message began to pop up. And it’s recurring every minute… Here is the console import portion: = // RegKeyToMOF by Mark Cochrane (thanks