Re: [mssms] Query on "Windows 10 Update Assistant"

How are you handling and delivering Windows Updates? If you're seeing this behavior then you're either not managing the updates or you have a sort of Dual-Scan behavior enabled. On Sat, Feb 10, 2018 at 12:52 AM, Miriyala, Vasu < vasu.miriy...@capgemini.com> wrote: > Hello, > > > > We observe

Re: [External] [mssms] RE: Office 365 updates basically impossible to deploy with Configmgr

Just a heads-up that David James re-opened this ask to finally fix it. See Twitter response below: [image: Inline image 1] On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 8:20 AM, Miller, Todd wrote: > I’m not having trouble getting the O365 patches to appear on my clients. > My trouble is the

Re: [mssms] 1709 Compat Scan

dmin@lists. > myitforum.com] *On Behalf Of *Adam Juelich > *Sent:* Friday, January 26, 2018 1:45 PM > *To:* mssms@lists.myitforum.com > *Subject:* Re: [mssms] 1709 Compat Scan > > > > Just a heads-up that you can utilize OMS in Azure for free to grab all of > this dat

Re: [mssms] 1709 Compat Scan

Just a heads-up that you can utilize OMS in Azure for free to grab all of this data, chug through it, and tell you which apps won't work in Windows 10, which ones will be upgrade blocks, etc. It also integrates into ConfigMgr with a nice dashboard and the ability to build collections off of that

Re: [mssms] Deploying the .NET registry entries

.NET Registry Keys? Or are you talking about Meltdown/Spectre? That third one is for Hyper-V Hosts On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 2:25 PM, Heaton, Joseph@Wildlife < joseph.hea...@wildlife.ca.gov> wrote: > So, I created a deployment package, with a batch file containing the 3 reg > add

Re: [mssms] RE: Windows 10 servicing update showing superseded?

Wendell, CB and CBB no longer exist. they have been replaced by Semi-Annual Channel (Targeted) and Semi-Annual Channel (Broad) I was just curious if the Feature Update there was referencing that. On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 11:29 AM, Kelkar, Bhushan < bhushan.kel...@allscripts.com> wrote: >

Re: [mssms] RE: Questions around deploying with SCCM/SCUP

Good question, I haven't thought about this before. If using Application Method you'd probably have to use Detection Method for Version => xxx.xx Otherwise, standard Package deployment would work. On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 12:23 PM, Heaton, Joseph@Wildlife < joseph.hea...@wildlife.ca.gov> wrote:

Re: [mssms] RE: Windows 10 servicing update showing superseded?

Is this a Semi-Annual Channel (Broad) versus (Targeted) thing? AKA, CBB vs CB? On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 7:58 PM, Bateman, Vern wrote: > This is how it use to show in configmgr..2 updates per each language. MS I > take it has made it easier to distinguish the 2

Re: [mssms] MS Office x86 or x64

The general recommendation is x86 due to Add-ins and such. If you can make x64 work, more power to you, but it's generally not recommended because most run into an issue that requires them to pedal back. On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 3:37 PM, Mike Murray wrote: > It's been a

Re: [mssms] RE: Confused - Spectre / Meltdown

Workstation: 1. Registry Key set by A/V (or manually set based on A/V guidance) 2. Windows Update 3. BIOS/Firmware Update from vendor Server: 1. Registry Key set by A/V (or manually set based on A/V guidance) 2. Window Update 3. Push Registry Keys (2 needed, the third is for

Re: [mssms] Confused - Spectre / Meltdown

Correct, although I think that third Registry Key for Servers is only needed for Hyper-V Hosts. On top of all that, you would need to apply a BIOS/Firmware Update to get the CPU Microcode Updates. On Tue, Jan 9, 2018 at 9:01 AM, SCCM FUN wrote: > Can anyone confirm the

Re: [mssms] RE: Spectre/Meltdown patch breaks ConfigMgr/SQL?

This is a good question, Brian. Let us know how it goes. On Tue, Jan 9, 2018 at 8:11 AM, Brian Illner wrote: > Thanks Rod > > > > This is outside of any AV considerations. We install our AV during an OSD > task sequence instead of including it on the reference

Re: [mssms] OSD problem - Failed to save environment to (80070057)

= This drive is locked by > BitLocker Drive Encryption. You must unlock this drive from Control Panel. > > > > Did you disable bitlocker for the upgrade? > > > > *From:* listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsadmin@lists. > myitforum.com <listsad...@lists.myitf

Re: [mssms] OSD problem - Failed to save environment to (80070057)

Which ADK version and which Windows 10 version? If you enable testing and hit F8, do you see the drive? For what it's worth, I've NEVER had to insert a storage or NIC driver if I've kept up with the ADKs. On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 5:30 PM, Mike Murray wrote: > Brand new

Re: [mssms] Re: Client provision mode - Task sequence Fail

Version of ADK? What anti-virus? On Sat, Nov 4, 2017 at 11:17 PM, Kevin Ray <kevinalive...@gmail.com> wrote: > TS method. > 1703 sccm version > > > > On Friday, November 3, 2017, Adam Juelich <acjuel...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Version of ConfigMgr? Versio

Re: [mssms] Client provision mode - Task sequence Fail

Version of ConfigMgr? Version of ADK? What method are you utilizing to upgrade them? TS? WSUS? Servicing Model? Just a side-note, you should look at upgrading to 1703, otherwise you'll be doing all of this over again in a few months. On Fri, Nov 3, 2017 at 7:34 AM, Kevin Ray

Re: [mssms] RE: Patching & Reboot Servers

I haven't seen that to be the case but maybe I'm not the norm? Really depends on your Maintenance Window and it's settings, as well as the settings you specify in your Deployments. On Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 10:57 AM, Erno, Cynthia M (ITS) < cynthia.e...@its.ny.gov> wrote: > > > Brian, > > > >

Re: [mssms] Windows 10 Feature Updates status "stuck" on In Progress

Provisioning Mode? On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 5:28 PM, ODONNELL Aaron M < aaron.m.odonn...@odot.state.or.us> wrote: > The clients are active and functional in SCCM before and after the 1703 > update, but the status never changes even after several reboots and forcing > a client repair. If this were

Re: [mssms] definition updates today

The think best practices is not to sync more than 3 times a day..Leverage some of the other sources for updates in unique situations. On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 10:41 AM, Stuart Watret wrote: > Defender has been fine, Endpoint has downloaded no definition updates >

Re: [mssms] Question about device affinity

If you manually set it, it is 'Administrator-Defined' and will stick no matter what you do, unless the User or Device gets deleted. Others, correct me if I'm wrong. With all of the methods in defining UDA, none of them are perfect. I think we are in the process of moving a certain direction but

Re: [mssms] Moving away from image installation?

I can't speak for everyone but I would believe most people are doing 'wipe and loads.' I think everyone's eventual goal is to get to that MDM/Co-Management state and start utilizing Auto-Pilot on stock devices straight from the vendor. How quickly you can get there, though, depends on business

Re: [mssms] RE: HELP - Windows Defender updates not working

Gotcha. On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 10:49 AM, Mike Murray wrote: > This is not the issue. Please see my other message. Thanks! > > > > *From:* listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsadmin@lists. > myitforum.com] *On Behalf Of *Gannon, Todd > *Sent:* Wednesday, September

Re: [mssms] RE: HELP - Windows Defender updates not working

Are you just doing this for Windows 10/8.x? If not, you need to enable the Forefront Endpoint Protection 2010 for Windows 7. [image: Inline image 1] On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 1:42 AM, Gannon, Todd wrote: > Check: > >- Windows Defender Product is checked in the

Re: [mssms] HP BIOS automation

> I am fighting an issue now with a “no bootable image found” message after > a subsequent restart. It is really difficult to find information as to the > exact UEFI settings that are required…. > > > > Thanks, > > > > Jeff > > > > Sent from my Windows 10

Re: [mssms] HP BIOS automation

What is the exact error message your get when it fails? Some of those BIOS Updates do not play nicely within WinPE and you have to run it within the OS-context, after the 'Client Install' portion of the TS. Are you ensuring the BIOS Update is newer than what is on the machine? Sometimes they

Re: [mssms] RE: Updating BIOS during imaging.

Whoops, thought you were talking about BIOS Configurations. I have the BIOS Updates configured during the latter half of the TS (after Client Install) so it is technically running within the OS. On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 9:30 PM, Adam Juelich <acjuel...@gmail.com> wrote: > This is the be

Re: [mssms] RE: Updating BIOS during imaging.

This is the best blog I found for using the Dell CCTK in WinPE. Be sure to match the right CCTK with the bit-depth of your WinPE OS. I use 64-bit for everything. CCTK in WinPE, and then the EXE within the OS. https://4sysops.com/archives/dell-bios-update-with-sccm-and-dell-command-configure/

Re: [mssms] Patch Deployment Device Restart Behavior

You control that with Maintenance Windows. On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 7:40 AM, Matt Gerding wrote: > Hello, > > > > I was hoping to get some feedback for what people are doing to suppress > reboots for Windows patch deployments via SCCM. More specifically, if your > patch

Re: [mssms] sccm plain image vs core apps image

The general consensus is your image should have: 1. All updates 2. Visual C++ Redistributables 3. .NET Updates 4. Office (if you have that) Other than that, keep other things out of it. Most other things change versions and such so often that it will be a pain to manage. On Tue,

Re: [mssms] Migration Question / Software Centre Branding

l - no biggy, just checking if it should. > > Stuart Watret > > On 3 Aug 2017, at 15:21, Adam Juelich <acjuel...@gmail.com> wrote: > > What version of ConfigMgr? The clients are updated? > > On Thu, Aug 3, 2017 at 5:12 AM, Stuart Watret <stu...@offshore-it.co.uk

Re: [mssms] Migration Question / Software Centre Branding

What version of ConfigMgr? The clients are updated? On Thu, Aug 3, 2017 at 5:12 AM, Stuart Watret wrote: > Morning, > > Moving CM to our new 2016 host. > Was going to change the Software Centre colour (Via Application Catalog > customisation) > > What I’m noticing is

[mssms] Windows 10 Remote Control

Hello Everyone, Currently on ConfigMgr CB 1610, managing some Windows 10 1703 Clients. I'm finding that I cannot use Remote Control on them unless a user is logged in. All of the client settings that I've used before are the same in regards to Remote Control. Any ideas? Thanks!

Re: [mssms] RE: Problems imaging a Surface Studio

Does that version of ConfigMgr even support deploying Windows 10? I thought it only supported managing Windows 10 with Software & Updates? On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 8:30 AM, Jerousek, Jeff wrote: > We’ve built one recently without any extra storage drivers. > > > > I would

Re: [mssms] Query about x86 & x64 bit content deployment

Are the content locations for these Deployment Types the same, or are they different for each (x64 and x86). It sounds like you are using the same content path for both, encompassing both installer contents. On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 8:41 AM, Thelen, Chris wrote: >

Re: [mssms] HP Elitedesk 800 G3 Drivers

t up until now, we have had no issues > with hardware or Windows 10 1607 deployments. > > > > *From:* listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsadmin@lists. > myitforum.com] *On Behalf Of *Adam Juelich > *Sent:* Tuesday, July 11, 2017 9:55 AM > *To:* mssms@lists.myitforum

Re: [mssms] HP Elitedesk 800 G3 Drivers

When you get into WinPE, if you hit F8 do you have an IP Address? If no, then your NIC isn't in your Boot Image. Which ADK/Boot Image version are you using? On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 8:24 AM, Matt Gerding wrote: > Looking for some troubleshooting guidance - > > > >

Re: [mssms] HP Elitedesk 800 G3 Drivers

When you get into WinPE, if you hit F8 do you have an IP Address? If no, then your NIC isn't in your Boot Image. Which ADK/Boot Image version are you using? On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 8:24 AM, Matt Gerding wrote: > Looking for some troubleshooting guidance - > > > >

[mssms] Multiple 'Windows Boot Manager' Entries

Hello Everyone, I'm currently doing my first UEFI and Windows 10 deployments. I was testing a few different Task Sequence structures on a test machine and after each imaging/TS process I see an additional 'Windows Boot Manager' entry. Is there something I'm missing? It's a pretty simple and

Re: [mssms] Software updates - possible to increase default maximum run time?

ximum run time?” > > > > *From:* listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsadmin@lists. > myitforum.com] *On Behalf Of *Adam Juelich > *Sent:* Thursday, June 15, 2017 12:46 PM > *To:* mssms@lists.myitforum.com > *Subject:* Re: [mssms] Software updates - possible to increa

Re: [mssms] Software updates - possible to increase default maximum run time?

Yes. If you go to properties on the specific update, you can modify the Maximum Runtime: [image: Inline image 1] On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 1:40 PM, Mike Murray wrote: > Since MS has moved to the cumulative update model, we’re seeing timeout > failures. I have to go in each

Re: [mssms] RE: Auto reboots of servers during patching

Aren't the 'countdown settings' only in effect if someone is logged in, otherwise it reboots right away? Size your Maintenance Windows appropriately and specify for Installs/Restarts to ONLY happen during MWs. On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 6:12 PM, Magnus Tveten wrote: >

Re: [mssms] Pre-Deploy to UDA Relationship

the requirements for the targeted device? On Fri, Jun 2, 2017 at 8:45 AM, Adam Juelich <acjuel...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello Everyone, > > I have an Application with 'Primary Device equals True' as a requirement. > I have a User collection with the proper user who has his Primary Device >

[mssms] Pre-Deploy to UDA Relationship

Hello Everyone, I have an Application with 'Primary Device equals True' as a requirement. I have a User collection with the proper user who has his Primary Device defined. I deployed to this Collection stating 'Pre-Deploy to User's Device' and I'm not seeing it install or in Software Center.

Re: [mssms] Anyone have experience with Java Deployment Rulesets or point me that way?

How are you deploying them? Really, from an Enterprise stand-point, Oracle only supports their Java Enterprise Suite which includes the supported MSI with relevant switches, management console, and ruleset and version management and deployment. Other than that, you're stuck extracting your own

Re: [mssms] Win 10 upgrading without installed apps

Do you want your users going to Microsoft Update? On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 11:17 AM, Mote, Todd wrote: > So I have Windows 10 Enterprise 1607 that I deployed without built-in > Store apps, like Candy Crush. I have one user who contacted Microsoft > Update and upgrade

Re: [mssms] Machine name change after the image - any issue ?

If you are, indeed, logging in and renaming the machine and rebooting then that is not expected behavior. Are you doing it while wired? I know doing it on wireless can give weird behaviors occasionally. On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 9:33 AM, Kevin Ray wrote: > im not

Re: [mssms] RE: SCCM 1606 Updates Sync Interval with Microsoft

3 times per day. On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 8:02 AM, Kent, Mark wrote: > Once per day. > > > > Mark Kent > > Manager, Client Systems Engineering > > Technology Support Services > > Resources for Information, Technology and Education (RITE) > > http://rite.buffalostate.edu

Re: [mssms] RE: Managing Server 2016

Are you disabling Windows Updates via GPO on your Servers? Many do it on Clients but often overlook Servers On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 10:21 AM, Mote, Todd wrote: > Sure it’s not going out to MS via GPO or something? I’ve got several > 2016’s in our 1606 and they’re

Re: [mssms] System Center Endpoint Protection

> Forefront Endpoint Protection 2010 > Windows Defender > > On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 2:14 PM, Kevin Ray <kevinalive...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Yes I have setuped ADR >> >> On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 2:03 PM, Adam Juelich <acjuel...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>

[mssms] CU's for 1607 not showing

Hi Everyone, For whatever reason I am not seeing any CU's for Windows 10 1607 in WSUS/SUP. I see them for 1507, 1511, and 1703, but not 1607 which is what the majority of our Windows 10 machines are on. Any ideas? ConfigMgr 1610 Thanks!

Re: [External] [mssms] RE: Driver management - opinions?

It seems silly that, after all these years, we're still dealing with bundles of INF's and stuff like that. Can't they all just move to an MSI format or something? I wish some focus was put on stuff like this instead of more trivial things. On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 12:41 PM, Marable, Mike

[mssms] Driver Import Issues

Hi Everyone, Firstly, the driver catalog I inherited is a complete mess and this environment didn't believe in 'refresh cycles' so I am inundated with models. I am currently looking to update a few packages for a few models until I have some down time this Summer to blow away the whole catalog

Re: [mssms] RE: Opinions Local Admin

Yep. LAPS is the only recommended solution from MSFT, outside some special third-party tool. With the new ADMX Templates I don't even think you can set a Local Admin Password, at least not without getting a warning. LAPS was created because of a security flaw identified with that older method.

Re: [mssms] GPO Update Disable Manual MS checks

Disable Manual MS checks > > > > And of course, it’s changed in 1703 – the “defer” option is gone and now > there is a “pause” option. No one knows if these are the same, different, > or something else. > > > > J > > > > *From:* listsad...@lists.myitforum.com

Re: [mssms] GPO Update Disable Manual MS checks

s morning, at that > point I started to believe them J. > > > > Thanks, > > > > Dewayne > > > > *From:* listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsadmin@lists. > myitforum.com] *On Behalf Of *Adam Juelich > *Sent:* Thursday, March 30, 2017 8:46 AM > *T

Re: [mssms] Windows 7 Start menu and Task bar customization

I thought 'CopyProfile' wasn't recommended after XP. On Wed, Apr 5, 2017 at 1:41 PM, Chobeaux, Sebastien < schobe...@csdccs.edu.on.ca> wrote: > If you did all your installations and configs using the built-in profile > can’t you just set the copy profile to true in your unattended.xml so it

Re: [mssms] RE: Query for users with multiple primary devices

Wouldn't this be a great feature? ::wink wink:: https://configurationmanager.uservoice.com/forums/300492-ideas/suggestions/15040527-option-to-specify-maximum-number-of-primary-device On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 2:28 PM, Enley, Carl wrote: > You could use this and just filter

Re: [mssms] Recommended process for moving SCCM CB to new server?

Just to piggy-back on this. What if the previous Systems Administrator named the server something stupid. How would one then migrate to a new Server with a new naming convention? On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 8:41 PM, Jason Sandys wrote: > I’ve never had an issue with it rebuilding

Re: [mssms] GPO Update Disable Manual MS checks

Yes, other than the GP setting to 'Disable Automatic Updates,' don't configure anything else related to it. There is the User-Side GP Setting: "Remove access to use all Windows Update features" That should do the trick. On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 7:12 AM, Daniel Ratliff

Re: [mssms] Maintenance Windows & Restart Behavior

> > *From:* listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsadmin@lists. > myitforum.com] *On Behalf Of *Adam Juelich > *Sent:* Wednesday, March 29, 2017 4:07 PM > *To:* mssms@lists.myitforum.com > *Subject:* Re: [mssms] Maintenance Windows & Restart Behavior > > > > Thanks, Mike.

Re: [mssms] Maintenance Windows & Restart Behavior

> successful with that. The WOL issues that we have run into in the past > have usually been attributed to either mis-configured BIOs settings or > users hard-powering off machines. > > > > Mike > > > > > > > > *From:* listsad...@lists.myit

[mssms] Maintenance Windows & Restart Behavior

Hello Everyone, This isn't as much of a question as much as a poll on how people are doing this. I know everyone is in charge of different environments, different sizing, and other complex variables. I'd like to know what settings you specify for the following items: 1. Maintenance Windows

Re: [mssms] Office 365 License not evaluating

Some clarification.. Did you deploy Office 2016 or Office 365? They are two differences licenses. The former would be licensed via MAK and KMS, the latter would be a user-based subscription. On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 12:20 PM, Kevin Ray wrote: > Hi All, > > I'm

Re: [mssms] 2012 to 2016 upgrade with step issues

What is STEP? Is your SCEP Client Policy set to install to those Windows Defender machines, or did you deploy 'SCEP_Install.exe' to them separately? They still need the 'Install' to be managed. I found this out a month ago as well. On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 10:40 AM, Stuart Watret

Re: [mssms] Windows Update Issues

Have you done WSUS Clean-up and re-indexing? On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 8:56 AM, Collin Murphy wrote: > Hello, > > > > Site: SCCM 1610 w/ KB3214042 > > > > I am experiencing significant issues with clients receiving updates. Out > of 1500 systems 201 are compliant, 131

Re: [mssms] RE: Rights needed for image creation

Are you trying to have them import computers into the 'All Systems' Collection? If so, can't do itit's a built-in Collection that you can't mess with, for good reason. On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 6:31 PM, Schultz, Michael A < michael.schu...@providence.org> wrote: > What does the adminui

Re: [mssms] UEFI transfering

atform & Infrastructure* > > *Coretek Services | Microsoft Delivery Manager * > > ( 248.767.4415 <(248)%20767-4415> cell > > * chris.bar...@coretekservices.com > > : http://www.coretekservices.com > > > > *From:* listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsa

Re: [mssms] UEFI transfering

You do not NEED to move to UEFI at this point. You DO however if you want to leverage things like Device Guard and Credential Guard. That is up to your organization to decide. If some of those secure things aren't a priority or necessity I would start leveraging UEFI for newer machines and

Re: [mssms] Catching up on patching

ps://aka.ms/o0ukef> > > -- > *From:* listsad...@lists.myitforum.com <listsad...@lists.myitforum.com> > on behalf of Adam Juelich <acjuel...@gmail.com> > *Sent:* Sunday, March 19, 2017 11:03:09 AM > > *To:* mssms@lists.myitforum.com > *Subject:* Re: [ms

Re: [mssms] Catching up on patching

. WUA Update 4. Servicing Stack 5. Convenience Roll-up 6. March Rollup 7. Start ADR On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 10:44 AM, Adam Juelich <acjuel...@gmail.com> wrote: > So, I created a SUG with the Servicing Stack Updates (Which was superseded > with a newer one) and the

Re: [mssms] Catching up on patching

? On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 8:27 AM, Adam Juelich <acjuel...@gmail.com> wrote: > Are your classifications correct in your SUP settings? > > On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 1:15 AM, Shane Alexander < > shane_alexan...@hotmail.com> wrote: > >> Update regarding importing Co

Re: [mssms] Enabling/Disabling SUP

by GP, just manually disabled. > > So could the ConfigMgr Client re-enable a manually disabled Windows > Updates service on a client if SUP was set to yes in the client settings? > > On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 9:49 AM, Adam Juelich <acjuel...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> The a

Re: [mssms] Enabling/Disabling SUP

The actual Service? That shouldn't be disabled. The only thing you want to disable in Group Policy is 'Automatic Updates.' The service is still leveraged for WU through the ConfigMgr Client. On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 8:28 AM, David Jones wrote: > I have found the same to

Re: [mssms] Catching up on patching

es which just don't install or > detect correctly unless you have the latest WUA. So research what versions > of that you have out there, and get that to the latest version; otherwise > you might be chasing patching installation issues that end up being "latest > wua require

Re: [mssms] Catching up on patching

nience rollup as an Application? Why not an update? >> >> >> >> *Daniel Ratliff* >> >> >> >> *From:* listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsadmin@lists.myitf >> orum.com] *On Behalf Of *Adam Juelich >> *Sent:* Thursday, March 16, 2

Re: [mssms] Defualt "Google Chromo & IE" homepage setup

Why would you not use a GPO? In terms of IE, you can use the IEAK. In terms of Chrome, there are Preference files that you can manipulate and copy down/overwrite. On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 12:19 PM, Kevin Ray wrote: > Hi All, > > In reference image i have set Chromo and

[mssms] Catching up on patching

Hello Everyone, A hypothetical scenario for you that I am actually facing, assuming Windows 7 SP1: What would you do if you came into an environment where patching was sparse and erratic over the past few years and documentation and historical knowledge was uncertain? I was thinking about

Re: [mssms] Re: CM 1606hf2 SUP Setup

ows-server-2012-r2> On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 8:47 AM, David Jones <dkjones9...@gmail.com> wrote: > Yes changed the policy back to Yes last week. SUP is on Server 2012R2 > > On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 9:30 AM, Adam Juelich <acjuel...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Assuming you

Re: [mssms] Re: CM 1606hf2 SUP Setup

Assuming you changed it back, no. Again...which version of Server is your SUP on? On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 8:13 AM, Adam Juelich <acjuel...@gmail.com> wrote: > No, you shouldn't. Which version of Server is your SUP on? If it is > older than 2016, there are steps

Re: [mssms] Re: CM 1606hf2 SUP Setup

te and > Servicing Feature that needs to be installed? > > > [image: Inline image 1] > [image: Inline image 2] > > > On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 4:03 PM, Adam Juelich <acjuel...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Have you enabled 'Upgrades' under your SUP Classifications? &g

Re: [mssms] Re: CM 1606hf2 SUP Setup

What Server Version is your SUP on? On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 2:27 PM, David Jones wrote: > I am so used to our using Pro instead of Enterprise that I never think of > it. Does Windows 10 Servicing even work for Windows 10 Pro? > > > On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 3:00 PM, David

Re: [mssms] Re: CM 1606hf2 SUP Setup

Have you enabled 'Upgrades' under your SUP Classifications? On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 3:01 PM, Adam Juelich <acjuel...@gmail.com> wrote: > What Server Version is your SUP on? > > On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 2:27 PM, David Jones <dkjones9...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >&

Re: [mssms] windows 10 OS Build Licence question

r 10, 2017 at 7:51 PM, Adam Juelich <acjuel...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Installing Volume Activation Services Role in Windows Server 2012 to >> setup a KMS Host >> <https://blogs.technet.microsoft.com/askcore/2013/03/14/installing-volume-activation-services-role-in-window

Re: [mssms] windows 10 OS Build Licence question

ric.morri...@outlook.com> wrote: > I just rolled out a 2016 KMS server and used SLMGR.VBS still. I don’t > believe there is a role for KMS, it’s all tied to the license key you > activate the server with. > > > > *From:* listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsadmin@lists. >

Re: [mssms] windows 10 OS Build Licence question

With Server 2012 and newer, isn't there actually a Role/Feature that walks you through it? I don't even know if you need to utilize those scripts any longer. On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 3:26 PM, Eric Morrison wrote: > This should help:

Re: [mssms] Applications stuck in Software Center

tested personally. > > On Tue, Mar 7, 2017 at 1:35 PM, Adam Juelich <acjuel...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hah! I wish it was something exciting! >> >> It is Faronics Insight software. Basically lab management software for >> instructors. Each application is the

Re: [mssms] Applications stuck in Software Center

ur > for the SCCM client to totally resync and get back to working correctly. > > To reset the client, run this command: > wmic /namespace:\\root\ccm path SMS_Client CALL ResetPolicy 1 > /NOINTERACTIVE > > > On Tue, Mar 7, 2017 at 9:30 AM, Adam Juelich <acjuel...

Re: [mssms] Applications stuck in Software Center

be opening up a case with MSFT Thanks. On Fri, Mar 3, 2017 at 2:02 PM, Adam Juelich <acjuel...@gmail.com> wrote: > Unfortunately, that does not appear to have worked. > > We had two DP's. We didn't really need the second one but I kept it there > for redundancy until we decide

Re: [mssms] Managing a Surface Hub with ConfigMgr

Someone else asked this same question a month or so ago. I don't think it was ever resolved. He was unable to utilize the ConfigMgr Client on it. On Sun, Mar 5, 2017 at 4:49 PM, Corkill, Daniel < danielcork...@logan.qld.gov.au> wrote: > Can this be done? In the documentation it only talks

Re: [mssms] Applications stuck in Software Center

e. If you ‘retire’ the application and run policy > updates does that fix it? > > > > Thanks, > > > > *Josiah P. Pewterbaugh* > T: +1 804 775 7657 <(804)%20775-7657> > > *From:* listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsadmin@lists. > myitforum.com] *On Beh

[mssms] Applications stuck in Software Center

Hello Everyone, On ConfigMgr CB 1610 on Server 2012 R2. I'm seeing a weird issue where Applications are remaining in Software Center long after the deployment has been deleted. This is applying to both Device and User-Based Deployments. Looking under Site Status I do have a 'Critical' for

Re: [mssms] *.bin files not being copied to ccmcache

Have you verified content on the DP? I've seen weird issues with HP BIOS that stung me a few times. I would test things manually, create the Application, and then deploy only to find out it is missing files. It is standard behavior with HP BIOS to delete some of the files after it has run

Re: [mssms] If i replace install.wim file with my captured WIM file(MDT based captured wim file). Will it work ?

why would you do that? On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 1:13 PM, Kevin Ray wrote: > Hi All, > > In windows 7/8/10 Source files. If i replace "install.wim" file with > mycaptured WIM file(MDT based captured wim file). Will it work when i do > Bootable ISO/USB based OS

Re: [mssms] Windows 7 B after Convenience Roll-up

ed_=BQMFAg=Ln8c1CLEgbhz4W2FGOnrXYpHvIYN4k_cXHVmsANM4XI=zAhc69MwvUId2afOheLZsnttbIFqxDANe5KRT-ZKir4=uHdy6p01-w9GZjdBVTraJ5PHeWP6yKoA_xCBrm33uC4=qGt8-ZGt5rG-J3ClWoppG9TfmFKmktUZprrf0vtNjII=> > > > > [image: 1E events banner] <http://info.1e.com/1e-regional-events> > >

[mssms] Windows 7 B after Convenience Roll-up

Hello Everyone, I'm working on updating my Windows 7 Base Image. I applied the Convenience Roll-Ip and all CU's using DISM and then imported it into ConfigMgr. I am now doing a B by including IE11, WMF5.1, dotNET 4.6.2, and Visual C++. I want it to grab any remaining Windows Updates but what

Re: [mssms] after Windows 10 upgrade - Microsoft auto updates are slowing network

If you're doing all Updates through ConfigMgr you should also have this set: Windows Components/Windows Update Configure Automatic Updates Disabled On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 11:43 AM, Niall Brady wrote: > also to troubleshoot use powershell and get-windowsupdate.log to

Re: [mssms] Off Topic: Windows 10 LTSB or CBB

Microsoft pushes CBB for most environments pretty hard. The fact that we are still having this conversation means that something still isn't ideal for us. When 1511 CBB does go EoL, yes, Microsoft will stop publishing updates for it. The big issue, as you state, is the interruption this update

Re: UPDATE: RE: [mssms] Upgrading 1511 to 1607 w/ Bitlocker

m_index.php_feed_=BQMFAg=Ln8c1CLEgbhz4W2FGOnrXYpHvIYN4k_cXHVmsANM4XI=zAhc69MwvUId2afOheLZsnttbIFqxDANe5KRT-ZKir4=uHdy6p01-w9GZjdBVTraJ5PHeWP6yKoA_xCBrm33uC4=qGt8-ZGt5rG-J3ClWoppG9TfmFKmktUZprrf0vtNjII=> > > > > [image: 1E events banner] <http://info.1e.com/1e-regional-events> > > > >

Re: UPDATE: RE: [mssms] Upgrading 1511 to 1607 w/ Bitlocker

I would be curious to see whether it is a bug or not. I'm planning and hoping to use the Servicing Method when we start deploying Windows 10. On Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 7:19 AM, Kamerman, Sol wrote: > All: > > > > I decided to go the Task Sequence route to update the system

Re: [mssms] Windows 10 & SCEP

Anybody know of a 'detection method' for SCEP on Windows 10? Windows Defender is already there. Is the 'Managed Defender' folder under Program Files the ticket? On Sat, Jan 28, 2017 at 8:01 PM, Adam Juelich <acjuel...@gmail.com> wrote: > Oh, ok. Gotcha. I thought we just needed

  1   2   >