Re: [mssms] Enabling/Disabling SUP

2017-03-17 Thread Adam Juelich
That I'm unsure of. I know it needs it to be enabled to function, so I would say 'yes.' On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 9:49 AM, David Jones wrote: > Actually, yes I meant the Windows Updates service on the Exchange servers. > My understanding is it wasn't disabled by GP, just

Re: [mssms] SCCM Client failed to get sitecode

2017-03-17 Thread Kevin Ray
any idea why the client activity not showing [image: Inline image 1] On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 11:49 AM, Kevin Ray wrote: > Yes Erik, > > Worked like Champ :). Thanks for help > > On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 11:27 AM, Erik Wold wrote: > >> Have

Re: [mssms] DP log issue

2017-03-17 Thread Jason Sandys
Where did you set this value? Setting it on the site server has nothing to do with the log size on the DP. J From: on behalf of "Thelen, Chris" Reply-To: "mssms@lists.myitforum.com" Date: Friday, March

RE: [mssms] DP log issue

2017-03-17 Thread Thelen, Chris
I set it on four DP’s, didn’t make a difference on any of them. From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Jason Sandys Sent: Friday, March 17, 2017 12:12 PM To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: Re: [mssms] DP log issue Where did you set this

Re: [mssms] Catching up on patching

2017-03-17 Thread Adam Juelich
So, I created a SUG with the Servicing Stack Updates (Which was superseded with a newer one) and the July WUA. I then created another SUG with the Convenience Rollup. Can I deploy both of these at the same time or should I do the first one, once I hit good compliance then deploy the Rollup? On

[mssms] User profile migration with windows 10

2017-03-17 Thread Kevin Ray
Hi All, I have X(old domains with windows 7) and Y(new domain with windows10) Now I'm trying to migrate the X domain machines. Here Both X and Y are different forests. No trust...both are different so here when i added X domain machines to Y domain. Users are loading with new profiles. So

Re: [mssms] Enabling/Disabling SUP

2017-03-17 Thread Todd Hemsell
the place to look would be that client repair check log. It list what it checks. If it checks it I would assume it fixes it. Also might tell you in the console on client health actions. On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 8:28 AM, David Jones wrote: > I have found the same to be

[mssms] sms client repair script

2017-03-17 Thread Art Flores
Greetings and Felicitations! I read about this script at the link below. Public_SMS_CLIFIX_V4.21.vbs.txt https://shauncassells.wordpress.com/2017/03/09/sms-2003-client-health-group-policy-initiated-based-script-all-those-core-fixes-still-work-great-with-sccm-current-branch-for-free/ Does anyone

Re: [mssms] User profile migration with windows 10

2017-03-17 Thread Erik Wold
If I understand correctly I think that if you don't have trust between X and Y you must run scanstate on X before loadstate in Y since usmt can't get the SID from X. Mvh Erik _ From: Kevin Ray > Sent: fredag,

Re: [mssms] User profile migration with windows 10

2017-03-17 Thread Todd Hemsell
I think you can specify domains you want to migrate, have a look at the command line options. I have not done it, I migrate the machines and users then roll them to the new os. On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 1:55 PM, Kevin Ray wrote: > Hi All, > > I have X(old domains with

Re: [mssms] Collection variables not showing up on "All Unknown Computers" collection

2017-03-17 Thread Kevin Ray
any help on this strange issue On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 2:57 PM, Kevin Ray wrote: > Hi All, > > Collection variables not showing up on "All Unknown Computers" > collection.. But when am trying to image a unknown system its asking for > variables . > > Checked in database

Re: [mssms] Enabling/Disabling SUP

2017-03-17 Thread David Jones
Actually, yes I meant the Windows Updates service on the Exchange servers. My understanding is it wasn't disabled by GP, just manually disabled. So could the ConfigMgr Client re-enable a manually disabled Windows Updates service on a client if SUP was set to yes in the client settings? On Fri,

Re: [mssms] Catching up on patching

2017-03-17 Thread Shane Alexander
Update regarding importing Convenience Rollup Update KB3125574 into WSUS, and then sync'ing expecting to see it in ConfigMgr SUP. It imports OK to WSUS, but doesn't seem to sync across into ConfigMgr SUP. Was expecting it would just like KB2775511, as per below link.

RE: [mssms] DP log issue

2017-03-17 Thread Daniel Ratliff
Check your log settings in the registry too, maybe you have debug turned on. Daniel Ratliff From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Jason Sandys Sent: Thursday, March 16, 2017 6:39 PM To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: Re: [mssms] DP log

Re: [mssms] Catching up on patching

2017-03-17 Thread Adam Juelich
Are your classifications correct in your SUP settings? On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 1:15 AM, Shane Alexander < shane_alexan...@hotmail.com> wrote: > Update regarding importing Convenience Rollup Update KB3125574 into WSUS, > and then sync'ing expecting to see it in ConfigMgr SUP. > > > It imports OK

Re: [mssms] Enabling/Disabling SUP

2017-03-17 Thread David Jones
I have found the same to be true. But does anyone know, is it expected/normal behavior for the SCCM client to enable Windows Updates service on a computer/server that has it disabled if the SUP policy is enabled in the client settings? On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 4:26 PM, Todd Hemsell

RE: [mssms] DP log issue

2017-03-17 Thread Thelen, Chris
I have actually attempted to increase the size and have checked the registry settings. The registry settings I’ve checked are “HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\SMS\DP\Logging\@GLOBAL” Log level is 1, and LogMaxSize I changed to 0x00a0 which should be 10MB. But the smsdpmon.logs on

Re: [mssms] Enabling/Disabling SUP

2017-03-17 Thread Adam Juelich
The actual Service? That shouldn't be disabled. The only thing you want to disable in Group Policy is 'Automatic Updates.' The service is still leveraged for WU through the ConfigMgr Client. On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 8:28 AM, David Jones wrote: > I have found the same to