Re: defining a macro to sz an attachment

2000-09-01 Thread David McNett
On 31-Aug-2000, Michael Elkins wrote: On Thu, Aug 31, 2000 at 08:04:23AM -0500, John Buttery wrote: Basically, the end result is that if I have a file called "stressre1.exe" (for example) attached to an email, I can write a macro that when invoked will do "sz stressre1.exe" as if I had

Re: mutt and qmail

2000-09-01 Thread Timothy Legant
On Thu, Aug 31, 2000 at 12:10:31PM -0700, Jason Helfman wrote: don't you find the file structure of this just horrid though? To be perfectly honest, I don't ever see the structure during normal use. The *only* time I have to think about it is when I write a script that manipulates the files in

TERM problem

2000-09-01 Thread Eric Smith
This is not a mutt problem per se but more a terminal problem whose only (current) symptom is mutt not sizing/coloring correctly - all other apps fine. So I am using this as the excuse to ask it here (where I know the answers will be). two machines - problem only with machine2:

Creating mailboxes in 1.3.8

2000-09-01 Thread Ben Beuchler
If I attempt to save mail to a non-existent IMAP folder, I get this error: imap_copy_messages [a0894 NO [TRYCREATE] Mailbox does not exist.] instead of mutt nicely offering to create the folder for me. If, however, I switch to the 'change folder' screen I can create IMAP folders without

Mutt+Cygwin [Re: M$ dog]

2000-09-01 Thread Ulf Erikson
It boils down to mutt's UNIX-like behavior of expecting other pieces to be there; all mutt does is read mail, and it sucks less at that than anything else. The biggest problem people often quote is the lack of an MTA, since mutt does not talk directly to the MDA on the recipient

removing Reply-To when composing

2000-09-01 Thread Attila Csosz
How to control which fields get into the editor when composing? I don't want the Bcc, and the Reply-To lines in the editor when composing messages. Thanks Attila -- -- - Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Debian 2.2 Linux / 2.2.13 /

A pop3 question.

2000-09-01 Thread Brian Salter-Duke
I get a small amount of mail at work on a POP3 server and have been getting it to my unix machine, rather than my PC, when out of the office by fetchmail. Works fine. I have just tried compiling 1.3.8 with --enable-pop and that works fine too. However I have two questions:- 1. G is bound to

A wish for a new configure flag.

2000-09-01 Thread Brian Salter-Duke
I know little or nothing about configure so could not start to do this myself. Would it be possible to have a configure flag called something like --compile-only?. This would merely compile mutt and nothing else. I find I often do a complete install and then with the same version I want to do

Re: A wish for a new configure flag.

2000-09-01 Thread Brian Salter-Duke
On Fri, Sep 01, 2000 at 10:04:42PM -0500, Jeremy Blosser wrote: Brian Salter-Duke [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: I know little or nothing about configure so could not start to do this myself. Would it be possible to have a configure flag called something like --compile-only?. This would merely

Re: Creating mailboxes in 1.3.8

2000-09-01 Thread Brendan Cully
That bug has been fixed in CVS. Sorry about that, though. On Friday, 01 September 2000 at 17:44, Ben Beuchler wrote: If I attempt to save mail to a non-existent IMAP folder, I get this error: imap_copy_messages [a0894 NO [TRYCREATE] Mailbox does not exist.] instead of mutt nicely

Re: removing Reply-To when composing

2000-09-01 Thread Bob Bell
On Sat, Sep 02, 2000 at 02:26:38AM +0200, Attila Csosz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: How to control which fields get into the editor when composing? I don't want the Bcc, and the Reply-To lines in the editor when composing messages. To my knowledge, there's no built in way. However, you can