* Thomas Dickey [EMAIL PROTECTED] [001027 07:53]:
which is Pos1?
Ooops, I'm sorry. It's the "Home" key.
Best regards - Juergen.
Hello,
I've allready read the previous thread about forwarding
mails with attachments and the final solution was
resending mail with esc e
or
set mime_forward=yes in .muttrc
What the first solution does is, simple resending the message,
but not preformating it (header, body).
On Tue, Oct 17, 2000 at 08:58:39AM -0400, Thomas E. Dickey wrote:
On Tue, 17 Oct 2000, John Wright wrote:
On Thu, Oct 12, 2000 at 02:14:36PM -0700, Eugene Lee wrote:
Just wondering if anyone has gotten Mutt to work under the Mac OS X
Public Beta.
1.2.4i didn't compile because it
On Thu, Oct 26, 2000 at 16:39:28 +0300, Mikko Hänninen wrote:
Vincent Lefevre [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Thu, 26 Oct 2000:
I've just tried. This doesn't work, so there is really a bug.
What exactly did you try? Can you show us the command, please?
Finally, there is no bug, just a typo in
On Fri, Oct 27, 2000 at 08:37:33AM +0200, Juergen Salk wrote:
* Thomas Dickey [EMAIL PROTECTED] [001027 07:53]:
which is Pos1?
Ooops, I'm sorry. It's the "Home" key.
there are differences between various terminal emulators for the codes
used for home/end. XFree86 xterm for instance
On Fri, Oct 27, 2000 at 09:44:46AM +0100, John Wright wrote:
On Tue, Oct 17, 2000 at 08:58:39AM -0400, Thomas E. Dickey wrote:
On Tue, 17 Oct 2000, John Wright wrote:
On Thu, Oct 12, 2000 at 02:14:36PM -0700, Eugene Lee wrote:
Just wondering if anyone has gotten Mutt to work under
On Fri, Oct 27, 2000 at 11:43:10AM +0100, John Wright wrote:
Ah, post-5.1. yes the latest one didn't get past running the c++ compiler.
what was the error message? (most of the g++ problems currently are due
to things like missing or conflicting libraries - a year or two ago it was
Brian Salter-Duke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Fri, 27 Oct 2000:
It is not the attachment I want to filter and F is filter-entry for the
attachment. I want to alter the message itself.
Like Brian Tatge already said, the message body *is* an attachement,
from the MIME point of view (and how the
On Fri, Oct 27, 2000 at 06:30:16 -0400, Thomas Dickey wrote:
there are differences between various terminal emulators for the
codes used for home/end. XFree86 xterm for instance originally
supported PC-style codes (\EOH and \EOF), while rxvt used
vt220-style (\E[1~ and \E[4~). At the moment
Vincent Lefevre [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Fri, 27 Oct 2000:
~t USER messages addressed to USER
It should be
~t USER messages addressed to: USER
Otherwise, it is really ambiguous, in particular when one has somewhere
else:
g group-reply
On Fri, 27 Oct 2000, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
On Fri, Oct 27, 2000 at 06:30:16 -0400, Thomas Dickey wrote:
there are differences between various terminal emulators for the
codes used for home/end. XFree86 xterm for instance originally
supported PC-style codes (\EOH and \EOF), while rxvt
Hi,
I have a (possibly) weird request for mutt. I am using version 1.2.5i
and my problem is printing several tagged mails. I use this
set print_command="a2ps -b"" -R -q --pretty-print=mail -1 "
and what happens is that all the mail are printed properly, each one in
his page but while the
Of course just after I sent the message I tried again and found where
the thing is! I added a "fputc ('\n', fp);" after the "fputc ('\f',fp);"
in command.c and now it works perfectly. Still, maybe it's something
that should be done in the next release, it's up to the mantainers...
Thanks.
On Fri, Oct 27, 2000 at 15:42:59 +0300, Mikko Hänninen wrote:
Well, you can use a complex expression, like
~C "([EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED])"
So that's why it's EXPR, not USER. You're not limited to looking for a
single user. The same is true for ~t, so I think the ~t should
I use pgp-hook to define a key for an email address:
pgp-hook [EMAIL PROTECTED] ABCD1234
I also tell mutt to always encrypt to this address:
send-hook . set pgp_autoencrypt=no
send-hook [EMAIL PROTECTED] set pgp_autoencrypt=yes
When I send a message to this email address, mutt
I have Qmail and am filtering with Procmail to MAILDIR format, however I
would like to backup mail very easily by having all incoming mail to go
a backup-inbox in MBOX format, and use Roessler's compression patch to
view it.
Is this possible?
How would I define the mailbox format in mutt?
Would
On 2000-10-27 12:39:44 -0500, Jack McKinney wrote:
I have Qmail and am filtering with Procmail to MAILDIR format,
however I would like to backup mail very easily by having all
incoming mail to go a backup-inbox in MBOX format, and use
Roessler's compression patch to view it.
^^
* Thomas Dickey [EMAIL PROTECTED] [001027 07:53]:
On Thu, Oct 26, 2000 at 10:20:44PM +0200, Juergen Salk wrote:
[Home and End keys not working within mutt running in gnome-terminal]
# this describes the alpha-version of Gnome terminal shipped with Redhat 6.0
gnome|Gnome terminal,
On Fri, 27 Oct 2000, Juergen Salk wrote:
I have to apologize if I'm beating this to death, but I have to admit,
that I don't feel terribly familiar with all these terminfo stuff.
So, is there a way to use mutt in gnome-terminal with Home and End
keys working *and* with color support?
Mikko Hänninen muttered:
PS. No need to send emails to me privately, I'm on the list (as the MFT
header in this email should indicate...).
I'm sorry Mikko. I replied to Brian's message, and _are_ listed in the
MFT-Header of that message. Sorry for any inconvenience. I just didn't
pay attention
On Fri, Oct 27, 2000 at 10:13:55AM +0200, Michael Tatge wrote:
Brian Salter-Duke muttered:
On Fri, Oct 27, 2000 at 01:47:06AM +0300, Mikko Hänninen wrote:
Brian Salter-Duke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Thu, 26 Oct 2000:
In the attach menu after saving the message, I
want to modify the
Brian Salter-Duke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Sat, 28 Oct 2000:
It prompts for my filter script and then needs a
"yes" reply as it warns it is overwriting the mutt-hostname-number file
in /tmp.
You can probably get rid of that "yes" reply -- I'm not sure of this,
but I would expect that to be
On Sat, Oct 28, 2000 at 03:28:56AM +0300, Mikko Hänninen wrote:
Brian Salter-Duke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Sat, 28 Oct 2000:
It prompts for my filter script and then needs a
"yes" reply as it warns it is overwriting the mutt-hostname-number file
in /tmp.
You can probably get rid of
Brian Salter-Duke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Sat, 28 Oct 2000:
I always get confused about what the
menu are called.
A final usage tip -- I got confused too, until someone pointed out to me
that the menu's name appears at the top of the help screen when you
press '?'.
Good to hear things
On Sat, Oct 28, 2000 at 10:08:23AM +0930, Brian Salter-Duke wrote:
OK, I'll just clean up this lot and then I let people on the list know
how to use type I remailers with mutt.
Looking forward to it. :)
It would certainly be good if we could get Mixmaster to work, too. Remailers
are
it 's possible configure mutt to send my e-mail through my isp smtp?
i have a dial-up conection.how can i configure that??
thanks
--
Rafael.
§=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=§
| Rafael Alexandre Schmitt |
| Registered Linux User # 152146 |
|
Rafael A. Schmitt [Saturday, October 28, 2000 8:12 AM]:
it 's possible configure mutt to send my e-mail
through my isp smtp?
i have a dial-up conection.how can i configure that??
You have to configure your sendmail (or whatever mta you are
running on your desktop) to smarthost through
On Thu, Oct 26, 2000 at 09:11:20AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I wrote:
Anyway, I'd REALLY like to be able to change directories while inside
mutt; that's one of the things I've found wanting in elm that I hoped
[cut]
There are work-arounds: I can press "s", erase the suggested
As promised in another thread, a report on using type 1 remailers in
mutt as I see it.
I played around with mixmaster support in mutt, but with little success.
I decided to go back to the beginning, partly because of my failure with
mixmaster but also because I am not sure I need mixmaster.
29 matches
Mail list logo
