Re: Re[2]: HTML email that is NOT an attachment problem! :(

2001-05-09 Thread Suresh Ramasubramanian
Franke, Marcus proclaimed on mutt-users that: Wednesday, May 09, 2001, 7:05:41 AM, you wrote: SR Press v and pipe it to lynx -dump Better use w3m, it can handle tables much better than lynx does, and in another list Im in there were security problems mentioned with lynx.. syntax is just

sent-mail

2001-05-09 Thread Pradeep Sangunni
Hi, When I send a mail from mutt it gets copied into the sent-mail folder but when i open the sent-mail folder i get to see the name of the person who has sent the mail(From:my name)instead of to the person i have sent the mail to. Any solutions. Thanx Reg, - Pradeep. -- Pradeep Sangunni

Re: sent-mail

2001-05-09 Thread Suresh Ramasubramanian
Pradeep Sangunni proclaimed on mutt-users that: [set your date - today is not may 7, 1999] When I send a mail from mutt it gets copied into the sent-mail folder but when i open the sent-mail folder i get to see the name of the person who has sent the mail(From:my name)instead of to the

Re: Re[2]: HTML email that is NOT an attachment problem! :(

2001-05-09 Thread Thomas Dickey
On Wed, May 09, 2001 at 11:44:17AM +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote: w3m is not bad - but lynx has been patched - and the 2.8.4 devel versions do handle tables (after a fashion). Or there's also links. yes (after a fashion: lynx doesn't use line-drawing characters, and some of the layout

Re: Mutt issues with Solaris 8

2001-05-09 Thread Carl Constantine
On 5/8/01 8:35, Thomas E. Dickey at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: that depends on how you got the prompt (if you used an expression with tput, that's promising - but a hardcoded string isn't). Some applications such as bash may be linked with termcap which is not standard on Solaris. (And to

Re: HTML email that is NOT an attachment problem! :(

2001-05-09 Thread Stefan Frank
At Tue, May 08 2001 [21:10 -0700], Dr. Christian Seberino aroused my curiosity with: I got lynx to read HTML attachments but looks like MS Outlook something is sending HTML emails that are NOT attachments and my autofilter is not correcting it so I just see HTML source code. I believe I was

Re: Mutt issues with Solaris 8

2001-05-09 Thread Hanif Ladha
On Mon, May 07, 2001 at 07:59:04PM -0700, Carl Constantine wrote: I'm curious what other users have experienced using mutt with Solaris 8. I've compiled mutt 2.5.1 for it but am not getting some of the nicer features available in mutt like I see immediately available on Linux such as:

Re: accented chars - hopeless??

2001-05-09 Thread Wilhelm Wienemann
Hello Imre! On Wed, 09 May 2001, Imre Vida wrote: I know this has been asked but i just can not get it right I looked up the mail archive for answers, consulted several documents incl. manual of mutt and Linux keyboard and consol HOWTO I have LC_TYPE=de_DE.ISO-8859-1 ^^ in

Re: Mutt issues with Solaris 8

2001-05-09 Thread Carl Constantine
On 5/9/01 9:43, Hanif Ladha at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am using mutt colorfully on Solaris 8. I was using dtterm but have now switched to xterm (XFree86 4.0.3(154)). I just compiled it and made sure to use the terminfo that came with it. I also complied mutt with the ncurses (5.2) and

Re: Mutt issues with Solaris 8

2001-05-09 Thread Carl Constantine
On 5/9/01 14:02, Thomas Dickey at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: nfocmp should show something for 'dtterm', e.g., (the colors, pairs, op, setaf and setab items are what curses looks at to see if the terminal supports color) Ok, found it. What do I do with this information? How do I tell mutt to