Re: attribution

2007-03-30 Thread Bharath Bhushan
Gary Johnson wrote: [*** I apologize profusely for the top-posting and for having my signature in the wrong place. I'm using this reply format as an example to help answer Bharath's question. ***] Is the information at the top of your message below the kind of thing you want to include in

no fcc with command-line sending

2007-03-30 Thread Greg Novack
All, I searched the list archives and didn't find anything on this, so here goes. I sometimes want to send messages (with attachments) from the CLI. One way I do this is with: mutt -a ~/myattach.jpg -s look at this pic [EMAIL PROTECTED] messagebody.txt And it works, fine and dandy,

Re: no fcc with command-line sending

2007-03-30 Thread Greg Novack
Thus spake Greg Novack [03/30/07 @ 03.39.15 -0500]: All, I searched the list archives and didn't find anything on this, so here goes. I sometimes want to send messages (with attachments) from the CLI. One way I do this is with: mutt -a ~/myattach.jpg -s look at this pic [EMAIL

Re: adventures in coloring lines of the index view

2007-03-30 Thread Christian Ebert
* Greg Novack on Thursday, March 29, 2007 at 13:29:52 -0500: Thus spake Christian Ebert [03/29/07 @ 17.44.53 +0200]: In case you compile your own, it's probably a good idea to do something like: LDFLAGS=-L/sw/lib $LDFLAGS CPPFLAGS=-I/sw/include ./configure [...] I don't know what this

Re: no fcc with command-line sending, but with -i asks for PW

2007-03-30 Thread Rado S
=- Greg Novack wrote on Fri 30.Mar'07 at 3:50:31 -0500 -= Lo, if I do it using -i messagebody.txt instead of with messagebody.txt then it gets FCC'd, and even has my signature appended (which does not happen with the method that won't FCC either). Come to think of it, this has spawned

Re: no fcc with command-line sending

2007-03-30 Thread Greg Novack
Thus spake Rado S [03/30/07 @ 16.08.11 +0200]: =- Greg Novack wrote on Fri 30.Mar'07 at 3:50:31 -0500 -= Lo, if I do it using -i messagebody.txt instead of with messagebody.txt then it gets FCC'd, and even has my signature appended (which does not happen with the method that