for creating a great MUA.
Regards,
-rex
On Thu, 03 Oct 2002 at 07:09:37PM +0200, Hanspeter Roth wrote:
Which newsreader is most similar to mutt?
Mutt with a NNTP patch. Here's one that doesn't require any external programs:
http://www.ing.umu.se/~connor/programs/mutt.html
Regards,
-rex
--
The actual user of the PC -- someone
is reported only once
compose.c:1205: for each function it appears in.)
make[1]: *** [compose.o] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/local/src/mutt-1.4'
make: *** [install-recursive] Error 1
It works without the --with-mixmaster option. Any suggestions?
Thanks,
-rex
mixmaster nyms, but will they work
with 2.9b38 and mutt 1.4?
Thanks,
-rex
exiting, it will move all read
mail from /usr/spool/mail/your_username to the file mbox set in .muttrc.
The default is ~/mbox. The next time Mutt is started it will appear
that all the read mail is lost (don't ask me how I know), but it's in mbox.
HTH,
-rex
--
The actual user of the PC -- someone
not to
# change this value, as it tends to agitate the more fanatical netizens.
Regards,
-rex
On Sun, May 13, 2001 at 06:48:58AM +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
Using a large mallet, Duke Normandin whacked out:
I want to forward a message including the attachment the message
contains. Will Mutt do this by default, or do I have to instruct it to do
so? If so, how? TIA
truncate lines longer than (IIRC) 1023
characters. So you're likely to have truncated paragraphs and sure to
tick off just about everyone with your arrogant attitude.
If you want to break RFCs get a job with M$, where doing so seems to
be a good career move.
-rex
rypttoself +batchmode
-aeft %r %f"
But it is NOT the default in pgp2.rc
Be aware that ANYONE can see that the message is encrypted to you.
This is a security risk because it's easy to forget to unset the
"+encrypttoself" when sending a message intended to be anonymous.
HTH,
-rex
proceeds without error.
Is there some simple way to feed the first "y" to pgp so this ugly
hack can be avoided?
Is it fixed in the development version?
This is the third time I've posted about this without responses. As
far as I can tell, the problem exists for everyone who tries to use
pgp 6.5.8 with Mutt.
TIA,
-rex
ears, answer "y", then blindly "y" again and enter. The encrypted
message will be sent.
BTW, signing and verifying work for me within Mutt.
HTH,
-rex
PGP signature
needed other than Perl-NNTP-Client-0.36-1.i386.rpm?
Does it work with SuSE 6.4?
Thanks for putting the rpms together.
Regards,
-rex
On Wed, Feb 28, 2001 at 10:49:03AM -0600, David Champion wrote:
On 2001.02.28, in [EMAIL PROTECTED],
"Dirk Laurie" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The problem is this: by the time vim gets control, the quote sign ""
has already been prepended to the line.
Try using "par q" to
, send all the messages in the queue.
Have a look at:
http://lists.suse.com/archives/suse-linux-e/2000-Jun/2112.html
http://cork.linux.ie/projects/install-sendmail/
HTH,
-rex
--
Photons have mass? I didn't even know they were Catholic.
er to respond to the
prompt instead of hiding it and responding with the default?
TIA
-rex
On Fri, Jan 19, 2001 at 02:52:33PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When invoked from mutt 1.2.5, pgp 6.5.8 fails when trying to encrypt
to an untrusted (it works with a trusted key) key with the message:
[...]
So the failure appears to be that mutt uses the default response of
"N" instead
On Thu, Dec 14, 2000 at 05:48:30AM -0700, Charles Curley wrote:
One reason is security. GPG is free software, PGP is captive. This means
you can get the GPG source, read it and compile it for yourself.
What? PGP source code has always been available. The source for PGP
6.5.8 can be
On Tue, Oct 31, 2000 at 05:45:12PM +0930, Brian Salter-Duke wrote:
On Mon, Oct 30, 2000 at 11:19:07PM -0800, rex wrote:
Have you looked at premail? Last version I know of was 0.46, available at
http://www.radiusnet.net/crypto/archive/remailer/premail/
Yes, I did look at it and need
to questions.
-rex
Windoze (Potato,
Jack B Nymble), it's an embarassment to the *nix community. IMO.
-rex
--
The King has note of all that they intend,
By interception which they dream not of.
--William Shakespeare, _Henry V_, Act II, Scene 2
are essential tools for people who need to communicate but cannot afford to
risk revealing their meatspace identity.
Regards,
-rex
that it is encrypted to you (as can anyone else with access
to the encrypted message), which is a VERY strong clue as to who sent the
message.
It's really, really, easy to bungle security...
-rex
if Emmanuel has root access he can
comment out/edit the line:
O PrivacyOptions=authwarnings
in sendmail.cf, which should prevent "X-Authentication-Warning..." from
being added to the headers, after sendmail is restarted.
Regards,
-rex
--
If you think C++ is not overly complicated, just
d (I think this is a PPPd issue).
If someone else doesn't point out what needs to be configured, let me know
and I'll dig into it more.
Regards,
-rex
lookups) are avoided
My sendmail.cf is:
O DeliveryMode=background
and no dialup is initiated if the PC is offline when mail is sent. If
the PC is online, the mail is sent immediately.
-rex
of the pre-assigned topic keywords, or change the topic keyword
when the thread drifts into another area.
Perhaps it would work acceptably well on a list with more technically
competent users, like this one.
Regards,
-rex
for WinX. 6.5.2 for Unix is available
from:
http://web.mit.edu/network/pgp.html
However, MIT won't export from the US (except to Canada). NAI will
export, but apparently only has the commercial version and a demo:
http://www.pgp.com/asp_set/products/tns/jump_page_011800.asp
-rex
says that "--enable-exact-address" prevents Mutt from
altering the "From:*" line. It also says the option is broken and not
to use it.
Too bad, I use(d) a program that depends on comment form addressing.
-rex
is
THAT broken, by-the-way?) and considered the non-exact addressing broken!
I don't know what the problem with Mutt's implementation is, only that
the INSTALL file says it's broken.
Anyone know what Bad Things happen when --enable-exact-address is used?
I guess I could try it. :)
-rex
hell script that will issue this command periodically
using cron.
It seems to work, though there may be better ways.
-rex
--
"They have computers, and they may have other weapons of mass
destruction." --Janet Reno, US Attorney General, 2.27.98
and the "Sender:" field SHOULD NOT be used. Otherwise, both fields
SHOULD appear.
Aside from it being "SHOULD NOT" rather than "MUST NOT," if the
secretary in the example were the transmitter, but not the author, the
"Sender;" line should appear even if there is only one address on the
"From:" line.
I wonder if there are _any_ MUAs that implement this?
-rex
message can
then see that you are one of the recipients. If you're sending
anonymous mail, or do not want a link between yourself and the
recipient, this is a BIG security hole.
-rex
--
The King has note of all that they intend,
By interception which they dream not of.
--William
pe, when I reply to a message to
an alternate identity. Using your example, I've come close with two
profiles:
# rex's profile
# set rex (From and Organization, no Reply-To)
my_hdr From: \"rex\" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
My_hdr Organization: None
set hostname="ptw.com"
set sendmail="/u
, wouldn't it be best to show the world that M$
employs incompetent programmers who can't code standards on the rare
occasions when they attempt to do so?
-rex
--
You can lead a horticulture, but you can't make her think.
gp; format=text;
x-action=sign\n"
HTH,
-rex
--
"They have computers, and they may have other weapons of mass
destruction." --Janet Reno, US Attorney General, 2.27.98
if you ever wish to be anonymous because anyone
can see your identity. It's all too easy to forget to unset this option
when sending an anonymous message (don't ask how I know :).
-rex
t;Enter" to confirm, and the editor exit key(s). Here's the current
version of the script "bounce":
(.muttrc has set sendmail="/home/rex/bin/bounce")
#! /bin/sh
# uses ideas from a script by Winfried Szukalski [EMAIL PROTECTED]
from_file=${HOME}/.sendit_pre
to_file=${H
(95.3i).
If the message is edited ("e"), the bounce function is disabled, and "b"
results in a Bcc: query instead of bouncing the message as it normally
would.
rex [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
#! /bin/sh
# uses ideas from a script by Winfried Szukalski [EMAIL PROTECTED
On Mon, Oct 11, 1999 at 07:07:32AM +, winfried szukalski wrote:
I use the script you are looking for together with
[...]
Thanks much, Winfried. I have adapted your script to call the editor
only when the message is bounced. The script resides in /home/rex/bin
and is named "bounce.&quo
, but is quite awkward because it requires
changing the "From: ..." line, adding "Resent-From: rex@ptw", and
removing all the lines forwarding adds.
The (I think) ideal solution would be for Mutt to offer the option to
edit the message after "bounce" is selected. Eudora of
Do you (or anyone) happen to know how to disable this "feature," e.g.,
what changes need to be made to the source, and in which file?
I found nothing about it in the manual, and looked in the source
but it was hopeless.
TIA,
-rex
mode which will reformat
a paragraph (Esc-q) by stripping the quote character, reformatting
the paragraph, and then re-inserting the quote character. If that's
not good enough, par is available.
-rex
-- . Please send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with details
Premail is set to intercept calls to sendmail in .muttrc:
set sendmail="/usr/local/bin/premail"
Any help with premail/Mutt and/or an alternate to premail to use with
remailers/nyms much appreciated.
-rex
On Thu, Sep 02, 1999 at 06:28:05PM -0400, Rob Reid wrote:
At 8:35 PM EDT on August 28 rex sent off:
Mutt is running in a KDE Konsole (which can I paste to), but Mutt is
calling XJed in another window (I don't know what it is -- xterm? --
or how to change it) and pasting does not work
On Mon, Aug 23, 1999 at 01:02:10PM -0500, David DeSimone wrote:
rex [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Pasting to Xjed running as Mutt's editor worked under RH5.2. With
RH6.0 and KDE it does not -- nothing happens. Pasting _from_ Xjed
while composing a message still works, but usually I want
Pasting to Xjed running as Mutt's editor worked under RH5.2. With
RH6.0 and KDE it does not -- nothing happens. Pasting _from_ Xjed
while composing a message still works, but usually I want to go the
other way.
Any suggestions?
TIA,
-rex
On Mon, Aug 09, 1999 at 10:34:30PM +0200, Thomas Roessler wrote:
On 1999-08-09 12:43:07 -0700, rex wrote:
I don't mind -- too much -- having to spend a couple of hours
reading enough about procmail
A couple of hours? In doc/pgp-notes.txt, there is a recipe readily
available for cut
On Mon, Aug 09, 1999 at 12:18:17PM +0200, Thomas Roessler wrote:
On 1999-08-08 23:38:32 -0700, rex wrote:
Why do you call a convention that was in use worldwide for several
years and perfectly functional, a bug?
While it's not an actual bug, it's _not_ perfectly functional
of being backwards
compatible with a solidly established worldwide convention.
Just my $0.02
-rex
--
"...the very inclusion of the right to keep and bear arms in the Bill
of Rights shows that the framers of the Constitution considered it
an individual right."
-- Judge Sam R. Cummin
; x-action=sign"
}
:0:
* ^Subject.*make money
discard
#--
Is there any special reason you changed the default directory? It
seems to work fine with the original /var/spool/mail/rex
-rex
+Bx9uVr8XauaXSxvg7+Y86FtR426rd5m8
o1KS58zBAH2P23IBVk0ON9UIOT4iPBfBQeTUIvZh3FcV73EablFtRAhGojsJFoGY
CVfDWLS/UtBJ3eD+eAYmD8L8Z2oUK0voDecTHEVgW59SJ7pQdPxNA7QLcmV4QHB0
dy5jb220F3JleC5zaGVhc2J5QHBhbmFzaWEuY29ttA1yZXhAY29hY2gub3Jn
=r4oF
-END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-
-rex
we could expand this base a lot if pre-compiled DOS and/or
W32 binaries were easily available.
Yarn users would be good candidates to use Mutt if DOS/W32 binaries
were available.
-rex
o be on my system. There is no X11 directory
below the "src" directory that xterm.c is in.
I'm running Red Hat 6.0 with KDE.
Suggestions, pointers to a Jed mailing list, etc, would be most
appreciated.
-rex
--
Linux 2.2.1
be simpler for you if you
leave the sig below the content.
-rex
--
Linux 2.2.1
information PLEASE DO. This is Unix centric because I have
answers for Unix, not because I am trying to shun other platforms.
---
-rex
--
Linux 2.2.1
On Mon, Apr 12, 1999 at 02:45:22PM -0700, rex wrote:
I'm trying to get my ISP to support this, and need the (sort of) FAQ
on it as a selling point. Anyone got a pointer to it? AFAIK, it's
not made it into any RFCs.
http://www.faqs.org
Addressing FAQ
--
Linux 2.2.1
nix editors, but just switched to
using xjed, and it looks good so far. However, sometimes I want
to run Mutt outside of X. How can I tell Mutt to use xjed under X,
and jed when not in X?
-rex
--
Linux 2.2.1
57 matches
Mail list logo
