On Fri, May 11, 2001 at 05:29:44PM -0400, adam morley wrote:
> 
> my point is the reason for not violating said should clause is
> archaic.  my reason is that if your mail reader can't handle it, step
> into the 21st century and get a reader that knows how to wrap text.

Mail systems unpredictably truncate lines longer than (IIRC) 1023
characters. So you're likely to have truncated paragraphs and sure to
tick off just about everyone with your arrogant attitude. 

If you want to break RFCs get a job with M$, where doing so seems to
be a good career move.

-rex

Reply via email to