Re: Attachment Decoding Problem

2000-05-29 Thread Thomas Roessler
On 2000-05-27 21:49:21 -0400, John P. Verel wrote: Ah. So the issue is the sender, in this case presumably Lotus Notes. Yes, it is, and it is complete and utter brain-damage on Lotus' side. For some kind of handler, you may try the attached shell script, which helps at least in some

Attachment Decoding Problem

2000-05-27 Thread John P. Verel
I've received a couple of attachments which are MS Word in format. They were forwarded to me by another recipient. The attachments are preceded by the following text: UUEncoded file named: 1073313B.doc follows) (Its format is: Lotus Manuscript 1.0 ) Following that is the ASCII encoded mess.

Re: Attachment Decoding Problem

2000-05-27 Thread David T-G
John -- ...and then John P. Verel said... % I've received a couple of attachments which are MS Word in format. Well, they are MS Word documents, but they have been encoded for mailing. % They were forwarded to me by another recipient. That's where it always starts ;-) % % The

Re: Attachment Decoding Problem

2000-05-27 Thread John P. Verel
On 05/27/00, 09:16:03PM -0400, David T-G wrote: % % The attachments are preceded by the following text: % % UUEncoded file named: 1073313B.doc follows) % (Its format is: Lotus Manuscript 1.0 ) Here's your answer: instead of having been encoded with a modern MIME method (base64 or