Hi list,
I use
'mailboxes `find ~/Mail -type f -print | \
grep -Ev '(log|backup|sent)' | xargs`'
to tell Mutt about my mailboxes. One of them is not found though. It is
displayed if I enter the find command in a shell, GKrellM checks it
perfectly, but Mutt ignores it.
What is wrong?
tia
Hi list,
I use
set from="Thorsten Haude [EMAIL PROTECTED]
to change my address from local user to provider's user. It did not work
until I changed 'sendmail' from
sendmail="/usr/sbin/sendmail -oem -oi"
to
sendmail="/usr/sbin/sendmail -oem -oi -f [EMA
Hi,
On 00-11-20, Michael Tatge wrote:
set realname="Thorsten Haude"
set [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Why is this different from
set from="Thorsten Haude" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
?
Thorsten
Hi,
On 00-11-20, David Alban wrote:
I use:
my_hdr From: David Alban [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In my understanding (which is obviously flawed) that should only cover the
'set from', not the envelope. Could somebody comment this?
On a related issue: I now use
set from="Thorsten Haude [
no difference between
set realname="Thorsten Haude"
set [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and
set from="Thorsten Haude [EMAIL PROTECTED]"
and no difference between
set envelope_from
and
folder-hook . 'set sendmail="/usr/sbin/sendmail -oem -oi -f \
[E
Moin,
On 00-11-22, Steve wrote:
if not does anyone know of a text based email client that will work with
windows? that also supports POP and POP3.
Sort of. It's intended for discussion networks, but very powerful:
Crosspoint
It's probably too big for a few mails.
Thorsten
Hi,
didnt notice Thorsten Haude's incorrectly set mail-followup-to header
So didn't I. How can I fix it?
Thorsten
Hi list,
I use gpg (GnuPG) 1.0.1e-SuSE to encrypt my mail. One of the commands
configured in my pgp.rc is
#set pgp_getkeys_command="gpg --no-secmem-warning --no-verbose \
--batch --with-colons --keyserver wwwkeys.pgp.net --recv-keys %r"
which does not work. The output is not fully visible, but I
Hi,
Nils Vogels wrote:
I use gpg (GnuPG) 1.0.1e-SuSE to encrypt my mail. One of the commands
configured in my pgp.rc is
#set pgp_getkeys_command="gpg --no-secmem-warning --no-verbose \
--batch --with-colons --keyserver wwwkeys.pgp.net --recv-keys %r"
which does not work.
Remove the hash
Hi,
Charles Krug wrote:
Is there anything else I should try first?
set from="Thorsten Haude [EMAIL PROTECTED]"
works for me. I had to subdue sendmail though, so I'm not sure this is
enough for you.
Thorsten
Hi list,
I use gpg (GnuPG) 1.0.1e-SuSE to encrypt my mail. One of the commands
configured in my gpg.rc is
set pgp_getkeys_command="gpg --no-secmem-warning --no-verbose \
--batch --with-colons --keyserver wwwkeys.pgp.net --recv-keys %r"
which does not work. The output is not fully visible, but
Hi Martin,
Martin wrote:
When you look in your mutt/contrib directory you will find a file callled
gpg.rc for GnuPG, which i recommend right here, and some pgpX.rc files.
You only have to source the right file to your muttrc (see the
mutt manual for that)
In my gpg.rc i find:
# receive key from
Hi,
whe I press F9 Mutt says "no mailbox open".
Any clue? Thx...
Well, do you have a mailbox open?
Thorsten
Hi,
Martin wrote:
keyserver wwwkeys.eu.pgp.net
This option is commented out by default. You have to uncomment it to use it.
It works for your mail, so I take it. Thanks!
Thorsten
PGP signature
Hi,
Jason Helfman wrote:
| So I'm still missing a valid setting for pgp_getkeys_command. Why does
| set pgp_getkeys_command="gpg --no-secmem-warning --no-verbose \
| --batch --with-colons --keyserver wwwkeys.pgp.net --recv-keys %r"
| not work?
What does this do?
This gets me unknown keys
Hi,
I see on the mutt homepage that gnupg is recommended over pgp. Are there
reasons for this beyond the whole 'use gnu whenever possible because of their
licensing'? Or are there real, functional reasons behind choosing gnupg over
pgp?
The whole 'use gnu whenever possible because of their
Hi,
Jonathan Gift wrote:
I remember when first on mutt there was a command to display all my
aliases and then highlight one and send mail from there.
I press 'm', then tab.
Thorsten
Hi,
this is certainly ot, but you made a really wrong assumption (I hope) about
Germany and I don't want to let that stand.
I don't know the terms of the German grant to the FSF for funding GPG;
perhaps the test is on their web site (but, alas, I am not literate in
German).
The site's native
Hi,
On 00-12-14, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
Yup. We're the good guys
Well, I wouldn't go this far.
Thorsten
Moin,
"Am deutschen Wesen soll die Welt genesen."
^
That would be 'Leitkultur' now.
Thorsten
Moin,
To get ontopic again:
On 00-12-14, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
- - -
[-- PGP-Ausgabe folgt (aktuelle Zeit: Thu Dec 14 21:04:32 2000) --]
gpg: Unterschrift vom Don 14 Dez 2000 20:02:38 CET, DSA Schlüssel ID 90F89A7D
gpg: Schlüssels 90F89A7D von wwwkeys.eu.pgp.net wird angefordert ...
gpg: Keine
Hi,
Like the subject line says, I'm wondering whether this list is active or
not?
We're discussing even things we shouldn't.
Since my subscription, I haven't receive a single message.
Did you receive your own?
Thorsten
Hi,
But, how do most people handle keeping track of which mail has been
read? flags? old/new?
Flag and, if you like, color.
Or what else can people suggest to further ease things?
You mentioned Procmail, so this wouldn't be news for you.
Maybe you can setup a trashbin like discussed here a few
Moin,
On 00-12-17, Lance Simmons wrote:
A day or two ago, someone on this list mentioned setting up a procmail
recipe to have gpg get keys automatically. Does anyone have an example
of such a recipe?
I asked for it a few ago. The trick is to let GPG do it. Put
set pgp_getkeys_command=""
in
Moin,
On 00-12-18, Joe Philipps wrote:
I'm curious...do users usually use a separate keyring for things like
the Mutt list?
Not yet, but I like the idea.
Most of the messages I read have gpg complain about the veracity of the
key used to verify the signature, as well I suppose they should
Hi,
On 00-12-18, Heinrich Langos wrote:
is there a way in mutt to get reminded of that mail later or does
anybody know a local mail bouncer daemon that delays delivery for
a (by header or subject) configurable time ?
You could tell Procmail to put out an at(1) job.
Or make a makro to do this if
Moin,
On 00-12-18, Josh Huber wrote:
[-- PGP-Ausgabe folgt (aktuelle Zeit: Mon Dec 18 19:26:05 2000) --]
gpg: Unterschrift vom Mon 18 Dez 2000 17:59:07 CET, DSA Schlüssel ID 6B21489A
gpg: FALSCHE Unterschrift von "Josh Huber [EMAIL PROTECTED]"
[-- Ende der PGP-Ausgabe --]
That would be:
gpg:
Hi,
I want to run two Mutts in parallel.
1. Is there any problem except writing mailboxes?
2. Does '-R' read-only all mailboxes or just the one I name in the
command line? Is there another way to do it?
tia,
Thorsten
--
They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little
temporary
Moin,
so trifft man sich wieder.
* Christoph Maurer [EMAIL PROTECTED] [01-10-31 17:43]:
On 2001-10-31 Thorsten Haude wrote:
1. Is there any problem except writing mailboxes?
No, I often do that.
Do you have any special provisions in this respect?
2. Does '-R' read-only all mailboxes or just
Hi,
* Volker Moell [EMAIL PROTECTED] [01-10-31 18:18]:
Thorsten Haude wrote:
1. Is there any problem except writing mailboxes?
Do you have any special provisions in this respect?
I'm not Christoph, but I often use several mutt's at the same time, too.
I even modify mails in both of the mut's
Hi,
* Volker Moell [EMAIL PROTECTED] [01-10-31 18:50]:
Argh... ok, this was confusing. What I really meant was, you can get
into trouble, when you append two mails to one mailbox *at the same
time*. But this is very implausible. Normal operations like delete
and add mails are harmless (in my
Moin,
* John J Kearney [EMAIL PROTECTED] [01-10-31 19:02]:
please can sombody tell me how to enable colors in mutt
i have a color xterm and vim has colors in it
what must i do for mutt ot work here also
Do you have color statements in your ~/.muttrc?
Go to www.mutt.org and look for examples
Hi,
* David Champion [EMAIL PROTECTED] [01-11-02 22:51]:
On 2001.11.02, in [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Will Yardley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
it's generally considered rude to send to both a list and to someone on
the list, so you should only do this if the person has specifically
indicated that
Moin,
* Rob 'Feztaa' Park [EMAIL PROTECTED] [01-11-07 23:47]:
On Wed, Nov 07, 2001 at 12:55:42PM +0100, Thorsten Haude (dis)graced my inbox with:
No; you name advantages of GUI apps, which I am aware of (I'm writing
this with NEdit). What I called GUI-damaged user are however *not*
aware
Hi,
* Rob 'Feztaa' Park [EMAIL PROTECTED] [01-11-09 04:29]:
On Thu, Nov 08, 2001 at 10:52:05PM +0100, Thorsten Haude (dis)graced my inbox with:
You should try NEdit. Full GUI, full keyboard support, macro language,
the works.
I use NEdit on occaision. I don't like it because it's the only
Hi,
* Rob 'Feztaa' Park [EMAIL PROTECTED] [01-11-09 04:15]:
On Thu, Nov 08, 2001 at 10:29:32AM +0100, Thorsten Haude (dis)graced my inbox with:
You'd be surprised. I'm just trying to write a sigdaemon with Perl. It
should work from a config file and should also feed more than one FIFO
(I use
Hi,
* Lukas Ruf [EMAIL PROTECTED] [01-11-09 13:23]:
in muttrc, I easily can set a sendhook such that every email gets
signed by PGP. But this always sets the MIME type accordingly.
- - -
6.3.101. pgp_autosign
Type: boolean
Default: no
Setting this variable will cause Mutt to always
Hi,
thank you for your thoughts.
Thorsten
--
Omnis enim res, quae quando non deficit, dum habetur
et non datur, nondum habetur, quomodo habenda est.
- Aurelius Augustinus
Hi,
* Cliff Sarginson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [01-11-15 12:17]:
Yes I understand that, but it's not really what I want to do.
I want a means of downloading a digest, as a digest, i.e. a single
message and then by some jiggery-pokery undigesting it, perhaps
temporarily (a la grepmail). I know there are
Hi,
* Markus Boelter [EMAIL PROTECTED] [01-11-15 17:38]:
Now - when I quit mutt, I want the mails to be sorted in mailfolders.
What about this: Let Procmail copy every mail, delete them from your
inbox after you read them. Net result: Empty inbox, sorted mail.
Thorsten
--
They that can give up
Hi,
* Sean LeBlanc [EMAIL PROTECTED] [01-11-16 05:52]:
I see the lists and subscribe commands, and I added them to my .muttrc.
They *seem* to work, I haven't figured out how to get the list info that shows
up via lists, but anyway...
I was wondering how one might set up mutt so that you hit
Hi,
this one bothers me for some time:
I use
macro index d save-message=admin/trash\n Move mail to trashcan
to get mail out of the way. If I change the mailbox after that, the
first entry in the mailbox history is '=admin/trash'. Is there a way
of changing that, short of patching the
Moin,
* David Champion [EMAIL PROTECTED] [01-11-16 20:48]:
On 2001.11.16, in [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Thorsten Haude [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
this one bothers me for some time:
I use
macro index d save-message=admin/trash\n Move mail to trashcan
to get mail out of the way. If I change
Hi,
* chris [EMAIL PROTECTED] [01-11-19 13:06]:
What is the proper way to set up lists I have tried to use
set lists = [EMAIL PROTECTED] The manual says lists address address
Tried that didn't go. The same for subscribed???
This is my entry for this list:
- - -
# Mutt
lists [EMAIL
Moin,
* christophe barbé [EMAIL PROTECTED] [01-11-19 17:37]:
When you said you are suscribed to a list you don't need to said that
this is a list ... Mutt will guess itself.
Figures. Thanks for the tip!
Thorsten
--
Whenever there is a conflict between human rights
and property rights, human
Hi,
* Thomas Roessler [EMAIL PROTECTED] [01-11-22 01:45]:
On 2001-11-21 16:27:15 -0800, Greg Steele wrote:
When I use esck to attach a public key to an email, what is it
attaching? Is it in a form that someone can put it into their
keyring? It does not seem to be in ascii armor form.
Normally,
Moin,
* Thomas Roessler [EMAIL PROTECTED] [01-11-22 21:15]:
How did you try to import it?
extract-keys
pgp_import_command is:
gpg --no-secmem-warning --no-verbose --import -v %f
Thorsten
--
Anyone who is capable of getting themselves made President
should on no account be allowed to do the
Hi,
* Vittorio [EMAIL PROTECTED] [01-11-23 14:22]:
I'm using mutt to deal with the lists I've subscribed to.
I'd like to have the folder folder I receive my personal mail ($HOME/IN.personale)
to be automatically opened when I start Mutt.
What should I do?
mutt -f foldername
Thorsten
--
Hi,
* Christian Schoepplein [EMAIL PROTECTED] [01-11-28 20:26]:
What I'm looking for is a posibility to get a cursor inside the pager
which is positioned on the first letter of the line.
What about:
set pager=/your/favorite/pager
This might even be your editor.
(Crosspoint has an optional
Moin,
* Aaron Falk [EMAIL PROTECTED] [01-11-29 00:05]:
How can I cut text from a saved message and paste it into my current
composition?
I usually open up another Mutt and use X11's clipboard.
Thorsten
--
In dem Augenblick, wo wir anfangen unsere Freiheitsrechte
einzuschränken, besorgen wird
Hi,
* Dairy Wall Limey [EMAIL PROTECTED] [01-11-29 01:11]:
i don't want to have to start using unique addresses for internal lists
too, but it messes up my organization when list messages get in my inbox
(due to use of 'reply-all').
I don't understand the problem. Could you elaborate?
Thorsten
Hi,
* David T-G [EMAIL PROTECTED] [01-11-29 14:19]:
...and then Thorsten Haude said...
Hello! BTW, I only just noticed your clever domain name -- cool! :-)
Imagine my frustration when I learned that 'hau.de' was gone.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] would have been even better.
% * Dairy Wall Limey [EMAIL
Moin,
* David T-G [EMAIL PROTECTED] [01-11-29 16:32]:
% I don't know why I didn't get it the first time.
Probably because you're used to using mutt ;-)
Not really, I let myself slip into a pretty heated discussion about
Reply-To munging in another mailing list once. But yes, Mutt make it
easy to
Hi,
* Ken Ficara [EMAIL PROTECTED] [01-11-29 16:58]:
I have a directory full of Unix mailboxes. I put a statement into my
.muttrc like so:
set folder=/path/to/my/directory/of/mailboxes
I then start mutt so:
mutt -y
and mutt sez
No incoming mailboxes defined.
Huh? What
Moin,
* Dairy Wall Limey [EMAIL PROTECTED] [01-11-29 20:58]:
Thorsten Haude wrote:
Yeah, the basic brain-dead-mailer-problem and its reply-to-munging or
group-reply answer. Fortunately, there's Mutt. I use group-reply about
once a year.
I don't know why I didn't get it the first time
Moin,
* Jun Liu [EMAIL PROTECTED] [01-11-29 23:38]:
This probably sounds stupid but I really get stuck here. I don't know
how to setup filters to organize different mailing list into different
folder, just like pine does.
Have a look at Maildrop, http://www.flounder.net/~mrsam/maildrop/
Hi,
* Thomas Hurst [EMAIL PROTECTED] [01-11-30 00:21]:
* Thorsten Haude ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Yeah, the basic brain-dead-mailer-problem and its reply-to-munging or
group-reply answer. Fortunately, there's Mutt. I use group-reply about
once a year.
I have 'r' rebound to list-reply for all
Moin,
* Cristian [EMAIL PROTECTED] [01-11-30 00:29]:
I just noticed that somebody suggested Maildrop. It may be wise to
look at Maildrop first -- I surmise it is easier to use. Procmail,
on the other hand, is very powerful and the de-facto standard in this
area.
I used Procmail for two years,
Moin,
* Markus Boelter [EMAIL PROTECTED] [01-11-30 11:20]:
I'm using mutt and gpg. I want to sign each message with gpg.
Questionable at best, but completly useless unless you get your keys
on the server.
But: Is it possible to exclude some persons which get mails are not
signed?
Yes, by
Hi,
* Jun Liu [EMAIL PROTECTED] [01-11-30 12:12]:
I use procmail to filter those incoming email into different mailboxes,
but I don't know how to get into these mailboxes. Mutt only gives me the
/var/spool/mail/lxj.
Set them:
mailboxes `find /path/to/your/directory/of/mailboxes -type f
Hi,
* Jussi Ekholm [EMAIL PROTECTED] [01-11-30 12:40]:
Just out of curiosity; I'm using Exim as MTA and Mutt (of course)
as MUA. Procmail filters incoming mail into different mailboxes
and kills spam from known addresses. Still, I haven't set up
~/.forward.
So, is it really necessary to create
Hi,
* Dairy Wall Limey [EMAIL PROTECTED] [01-11-30 12:47]:
with postfix (if mailbox_command isn't set to procmail -t) you don't
need a fancy sendmail style .forward i just use:
zugzug% cat .forward
| /usr/bin/procmail -t
Use
| /usr/bin/procmail -t || exit 75
if you want Postfix to
Hi,
* Prahlad Vaidyanathan [EMAIL PROTECTED] [01-11-30 13:08]:
send-hook ~l set pgp_autosign=yes
Could you give me the motivation for this? Off-list, if you like,
because I'm sure this comes up twice a year.
Thorsten
--
They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little
Hi,
* David T-G [EMAIL PROTECTED] [01-11-30 16:11]:
% It's written in Ruby (http://www.ruby-lang.org/), but I can do a Perl
% version if anyone really doesn't want to install Ruby.
I'll wait for a perl copy, but I'm interested, too.
No. Please don't.
Thorsten
--
They that can give up essential
Hi,
* Thomas Hurst [EMAIL PROTECTED] [01-11-30 16:08]:
I wouldn't mind if mutt scanned the thread for Mail-Followup-To: headers
and Cc:'d anyone who had it set to their address explicitly. If people
off-list do this then, they get the message, but people on the list
don't get dupes.
It does
Hi,
I want to attach an encrypted mail to another mail, taken from my
$record. The attachement only contains the header though. MIME-forward
doesn't work either, same result.
What am I missing here?
Thorsten
--
They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little
temporary safety
Moin,
* Thomas Hurst [EMAIL PROTECTED] [01-11-30 19:00]:
* S. William Schulz ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
On Fri, Nov 30, 2001 at 04:16:47PM +0100, René Clerc wrote:
I'll wait for a perl copy, but I'm interested, too.
I'll take mine in ruby please
Initial perl version at:
Hi,
I just switched to Maildir. No mails are lost, but only one mailbox is
not updated. The deleted mails are tagged, an they vanish when I sync
the box. However, they are still in the 'new' subdirectory and
displayed if I re-enter the box.
I translated all boxes with Mutt. User and mode are
Hi,
* Thomas Hurst [EMAIL PROTECTED] [01-12-03 00:09]:
Deliver mail as normal to Maildir's. Every night, scan each maildir and
move anything older than (say) a week to a datestamped and compressed
mbox. Maildir is a good choice for the working mailspools because
it's robust and has
Hi,
* Will Yardley [EMAIL PROTECTED] [01-12-02 23:20]:
Benjamin Michotte wrote:
Oh my god...
I just switched from mbox to maildir... and also reswitch to mbox...
2 minutes 38 to open my in.mutt maildir (? 6000 mails) instead of 18
secondes to the same in mbox format
as others have
Hi,
* Will Yardley [EMAIL PROTECTED] [01-12-02 23:20]:
Benjamin Michotte wrote:
Oh my god...
I just switched from mbox to maildir... and also reswitch to mbox...
2 minutes 38 to open my in.mutt maildir (? 6000 mails) instead of 18
secondes to the same in mbox format
as others have
Moin,
* Thomas Hurst [EMAIL PROTECTED] [01-12-03 00:24]:
* Thorsten Haude ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
I have different views on Maildirs (see other thread), and I would
move the mails thread-wise, but on all other points, I agree.
Hm, thread-wise is conciderably more expensive - date-wise
Hi,
* Will Yardley [EMAIL PROTECTED] [01-12-03 01:08]:
Thorsten Haude wrote:
I don't use ext2, but Reiser. The difference is less severe, but
noticeable. Maildir seems to have the problem that it only works with
certain file system types.
i also just noticed your version string... if that's
Hi,
* Thomas Hurst [EMAIL PROTECTED] [01-12-03 16:28]:
Unfortunately neither libmutt nor Mail::Mutt (which would provide an
interface to mutt through scripting) exist :)
I found libmutt with Google.
Thorsten
--
They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little
temporary safety deserve
Hi,
* Paul Brannan [EMAIL PROTECTED] [01-12-03 21:34]:
If you want the messages to be deleted when you sync, set it to yes in
your macro; if not, leave it at no and forget about the macro. If you
want to be asked then just set it to ask-no and forget about the macro,
and when you usually
Moin,
* David T-G [EMAIL PROTECTED] [01-12-05 15:57]:
% I could send you a NEdit solution that could be changed to do what you
% want.
% Thanks, but I use emacs.
I think he was providing it as a starting base that you could adapt :-)
No; NEdit's macro language is mercifully unsimilar to Lisp.
Hi,
* Cedric Duval [EMAIL PROTECTED] [01-12-05 20:19]:
This is fixed in edit_threads.8
I have just patched in all three of your changes in 1.3.24i. While
patching, I got one error each (with different line numbers):
- - - Schnipp - - -
can't find file to patch at input line 715
Perhaps you used
Moin,
* Cleber S. Mori [EMAIL PROTECTED] [01-12-06 02:43]:
Any one, have a clue?
Is one of your receipts touching it?
Thorsten
--
begin 777 LOVE-LETTER-FOR-YOU.txt.vbs
M.*ROT13*-Unyyb,vpu.ova.rva.ubpuragjvpxrygrf.FVTANGHER-Ivehf
M.Vpu.jheqr.fcrmvryy.nhs.qvr.Sruyre.va.Z$.Bhgoernx-Rkprff.\$
Moin,
* Paul Brannan [EMAIL PROTECTED] [01-12-05 21:48]:
I accidentally hit 'r' instead of 'L', so the last two iterations here
were in private. René suggested that I forward his response to the
list.
Is there a good way to prevent me from doing this again in the future?
These are two separate
Hi,
* Brian Clark [EMAIL PROTECTED] [01-12-07 07:03]:
One thing I wish Mutt had, that The Bat! has, is a template system. In
other words:
Hi %UCFirst=%OFromFName,
On %OLongDate, %OFromFName wrote:
%Wrapped='%Quotes'
%Cursor
%Cookie=~/fortune
That used macros (not really the same as Mutt
Hi,
* Thomas Roessler [EMAIL PROTECTED] [01-12-07 10:42]:
In particular, evolution (1) is bad at noticing PGP errors, (2) doesn't
support rules like always encrypt mail to so-and-so and (3) replies to
encrypted messages with quoted, unencrypted bodies by default (a
*serious* security hole that
Moin,
* Roman Neuhauser [EMAIL PROTECTED] [01-12-07 11:30]:
I'm writing [somewhat slowly] an email howto which covers mutt
(among other things). It's aimed at helping unix newbies grok the
new terminology (MUA, MTA, MDA), and set their machines up for email
the hard way (ie.
Hi,
* David T-G [EMAIL PROTECTED] [01-12-07 13:11]:
% [Filename: LOVE-LETTER-FOR-YOU.txt.vbs, Content-Type: UUEncoded]
%
% Du hast mit dieser Mail den Virus LOVE-LETTER-FOR-YOU.txt.vbs
% verschickt. Bitte sorge dafür, dass Deine weiteren Mails
% ohne Viren-Attachment ankommen.
Gotcha ;-)
Hej,
* Martin Karlsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [01-12-07 17:28]:
* Thorsten Haude ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Procmail is indeed a close relative to Sendmail, it's rc file syntax
is bloody. I propose Mail::Audit if you know Perl, Maildrop otherwise.
I did some reading-up on Mail::Audit, and it seems
Moin,
* Marc Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [01-12-09 03:00]:
On Sat, Dec 08, 2001 at 05:30:20PM -0700, Steven Schneider wrote:
Right now I have three lines like thus:
mailboxes ...
mailboxes ...
mailboxes ...
How about this? (wrapped, should be all one line in .muttrc)
mailboxes ! `find
Moin,
* Benjamin Michotte [EMAIL PROTECTED] [01-12-02 01:14]:
On Fri, Nov 30, 2001 at 11:48:56PM, Thorsten Haude wrote:
I just switched to Maildir. No mails are lost, but only one mailbox is
not updated. The deleted mails are tagged, an they vanish when I sync
Not a answer, just a question
Hi,
* Benjamin Michotte [EMAIL PROTECTED] [01-12-03 00:38]:
Could I change my:
find $HOME/mail -type f -print | grep -Ev '(outbox|trash|spam)' | sort
| xargs
That part worked alright:
mailboxes `find ~/Mail -type d -print | grep -Ev
Hi,
* David T-G [EMAIL PROTECTED] [01-12-09 20:12]:
We had an exchange on this one before, but the more I see it, the less
I like it.
It all started back in the Usenet news days of 1989 and 1990, before
Linux had hit the scene (ca 1991, IIRC) and when the web was still a gleam
in Tim's eye (ca
Hi,
* David T-G [EMAIL PROTECTED] [01-12-18 02:17]:
(Oh, yeah -- the %_ ensures that the filename will be lower case.)
Huh?
Thorsten
--
Das Briefgeheimnis sowie das Post- und Fernmeldegeheimnis sind unverletzlich.
- Grundgesetz, Artikel 10, Abs. 1
Hi,
* Sanjay Acharya [EMAIL PROTECTED] [01-12-18 13:22]:
hi i am trying to configure my mutt...i am able to
receive my mails but when i send mails, i dont get the
mails. do i hacve to configure my sendmail? if yes
what shud i do?
Switch to something else, like Postfix.
Thorsten
--
Der Leser
Moin,
* David T-G [EMAIL PROTECTED] [01-12-17 15:39]:
While others may have said it, and some may even believe it, I don't
get it.
It's simple, once you think about it: You don't quote your own
comments. Thus, you cannot set them apart.
It makes sense to me to have a mixture of indent chars in
Hi,
* giorgian [EMAIL PROTECTED] [01-12-19 16:21]:
i haven't found anything in the man pages about mail filters;
initially i decided to try procmail, but it is decisely too much
insane for me: i'm a member of at least 15 MLs (plus this one :) ),
and my .procmailrc is an awful mess, so i gave up.
Hi,
* David T-G [EMAIL PROTECTED] [01-12-18 13:32]:
Hey, he said it happenned with Crosspoint, and I'd never heard of it
until we traded some email recently. If something of which I've never
heard can do that, surely something of which I have might have the same
shot!
Wrong network, wrong
Hi,
* Rob 'Feztaa' Park [EMAIL PROTECTED] [01-12-18 00:02]:
It's a quote string! Get over it!
My thoughts exactly.
Thorsten
--
Question Authority!
Moin,
* Rob 'Feztaa' Park [EMAIL PROTECTED] [01-12-20 03:18]:
On Wed, Dec 19, 2001 at 08:49:47AM +0100, Thorsten Haude (dis)graced my inbox with:
defeat the very purpose of the quote signs. Wenn ich auf einmal die
Sprache wecheln würde, nur damit es für *mich* klarer ist was ich
schreibe
Moin,
* giorgian [EMAIL PROTECTED] [01-12-22 14:54]:
i've generated my public and private keys with
ssh-keygen -t dsa
I tried to send a pgp signed mail, but what i get is:
gpg: no default secret key: secret key not available
gpg: signing failed: secret key not available
what must i do?
I
Moin,
* giorgian [EMAIL PROTECTED] [01-12-22 17:38]:
1) how can i tell mutt to automatically signs all my mail
set pgp_autosign
and not to ask for my passphrase every time?
You shouldn't do this (and I don't know how it's done).
2) if i send a signed email to myself, mutt recognizes my public
Hi,
I have set up my mailing lists to different addresses. To make it
easier to write mails, I have this line in my mutt.rc, and similar
lines for other mailing lists:
send-hook '~t [EMAIL PROTECTED]' 'set [EMAIL PROTECTED]'
However, this hook seems to catch too late, i.e. I see the
Hi,
I have set up my mailing lists to different addresses. To make it
easier to write mails, I have this line in my mutt.rc, and similar
lines for other mailing lists:
send-hook '~t [EMAIL PROTECTED]' 'set [EMAIL PROTECTED]'
However, this hook seems to catch too late, i.e. I see the
Hi,
* David T-G [EMAIL PROTECTED] [02-01-02 16:16]:
% I have set up my mailing lists to different addresses. To make it
% easier to write mails, I have this line in my mutt.rc, and similar
% lines for other mailing lists:
% send-hook '~t [EMAIL PROTECTED]' 'set [EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Makes
1 - 100 of 196 matches
Mail list logo
