On 11/18/2010 03:11 AM, marc pascual wrote:
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 3:27 AM, Andreas Ericssona...@op5.se wrote:
On 11/17/2010 08:11 PM, marc pascual wrote:
Hello,
I have too much passive checks coming in (12*880) to the point that some
aren't getting processed by nagios. Now I've decided
Good morning, or whatever as the case may be...
I have a Nagios 3.2.1install which is showing a problem I'm unsure how
to troubleshoot further. It's either something simple I'm missing, or a
deeper, more difficult problem. Or a transient to be perhaps put on a
shelf until it happens again.
On 11/18/2010 03:48 PM, Tim Palmer wrote:
Good morning, or whatever as the case may be...
I have a Nagios 3.2.1install which is showing a problem I'm unsure how
to troubleshoot further. It's either something simple I'm missing, or a
deeper, more difficult problem. Or a transient to be
Andreas Ericsson wrote:
On 11/18/2010 03:48 PM, Tim Palmer wrote:
Good morning, or whatever as the case may be...
I have a Nagios 3.2.1install which is showing a problem I'm unsure how
to troubleshoot further. It's either something simple I'm missing, or a
deeper, more difficult
Hi,
I have a need to run two different commands when processing the performance
data from Nagios (3.2.2)
I want the first command to run the process-perfdata.pl script from
pnp4nagios and the second command to log various things to a different log
file.
The reason is that we've only just
On 11/18/2010 05:25 PM, Deborah Martin wrote:
Hi,
I have a need to run two different commands when processing the performance
data from Nagios (3.2.2)
I want the first command to run the process-perfdata.pl script from
pnp4nagios and the second command to log various things to a
I'm looking at the same issue and our thoughts are to use NDO utils or
possibly custom NEB to grab perf data that way, but then still let
pnp4nagios run the 'normal' way.
Dan
From: Deborah Martin [mailto:deborah.mar...@kognitio.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 18, 2010 10:26 AM
To: 'Nagios
On Tue, 2010-11-16 at 22:52 +0100, Andreas Ericsson wrote:
That one was in 3.2.2 too though. Could you try un-commenting the lines
mentioned there and see if that helps?
It looks like something weird is still happening after making that
change. I checked some more hosts and the retry_interval
Is there a macro that expands to the list of notified or will be notified
contacts in a Host or Service notification? I'm currently using
$NOTIFICATIONRECIPIENTS$, but this doesn't expand to contacts that are actually
notified because if a contact's notification period filters them out, it
Hi,
Im trying to get my SNMP monitoring a bit more informative. I want
to monitor port status on ethernet switches (which Ive tested and
works quite nicely).
Im using the instructions given here:
http://www.thegeekstuff.com/2008/11/how-to-monitor-network-switch-and-ports-using-nagios/
I'm looking at minimizing the CPU impact that nagios has on our server,
and done some of the basic performance tuning stuff, but what I see
right now is a lot of the nagios worker procs generating a lot of CPU
and curious if there was a way people have used to watch what those
processes and
I was curious if we were able to make any progress on getting this patch
included?
Thanks!
Dan
-Original Message-
From: Max Schubert [mailto:m...@webwizarddesign.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 03, 2010 7:04 AM
To: Andreas Ericsson; Nagios Users List
Subject: Re: [Nagios-users] hostgroup
Tim Palmer wrote:
Andreas Ericsson wrote:
On 11/18/2010 03:48 PM, Tim Palmer wrote:
Good morning, or whatever as the case may be...
I have a Nagios 3.2.1install which is showing a problem I'm unsure how
to troubleshoot further. It's either something simple I'm missing, or a
Thanks for the input everyone. Much appreciated.
I'll try with merlin and see where that goes. And the script idea as well.
The trouble is Nagios is a complicated beast (to me anyway). Coupled with
that and getting pnp4nagios working as well this week, my head hurts from
config file overload :)
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 3:18 PM, Daniel Wittenberg
daniel.wittenberg.r...@statefarm.com wrote:
I’m looking at minimizing the CPU impact that nagios has on our server, and
done some of the basic performance tuning stuff, but what I see right now is
a lot of the nagios worker procs generating a
Yup, already enabled...
Dan
-Original Message-
From: Breandan Dezendorf [mailto:brean...@dezendorf.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 18, 2010 3:05 PM
To: Nagios Users List
Subject: Re: [Nagios-users] server profiling options
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 3:18 PM, Daniel Wittenberg
Watching nagios in debug mode for awhile, made me think about the
processing of macros and the performance impact. It seems that for most
macro's, like user defined ones, they don't change. So does it really
make sense to keep processing them over and over and over...could that
be something that
17 matches
Mail list logo
