would
care to lend his unique perspective and considerable insight to this
thread, I would be most grateful.
--
Jeff S Wheeler
On Wed, 2004-02-25 at 13:34, David Meyer wrote:
Is it that sharing fate in the switching fabric (as
opposed to say, in the transport fabric, or even
conduit) reduces the resiliency of a given service (in
this case FR/ATM/TDM), and as such poses the danger
On Sun, 2004-01-25 at 14:44, Will Hargrave wrote:
I would check the Foundry Fastiron series - maybe the 4802. Everything
I've read appears to indicate they support all 4096 vlans
simultaneously, although you will of course want to verify this.
I don't think this is true. Those of you with
On Wed, 2003-12-10 at 14:34, Christian Malo wrote:
the nanog-l is not WILLIAM LEIBZON's personnal hatered list. If he wants
people to read on his stuff, he can just start his own list.
Actually, he has his own mailing list, and it is closed to the public.
You can read it at
responsiveness.
--
Jeff S Wheeler
requests. I'm still waiting to
see how they do this as you can't tell from a DNS request alone.
I'm waiting for Illuminet^HVeriSign to add this feature to their
global title translation database and redirect all non-existant 800
numbers to recorded advertisements.
--
Jeff S Wheeler
received
from each peer as well as the prefixes installed into the FIB for each
peer (cbgpRouteBest BOOL). This would obviously be a big CPU hit, but
there is a great deal of data available via SNMP.
http://www.cisco.com/pcgi-bin/Support/Mibbrowser/unity.pl
--
Jeff S Wheeler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
networks, I suspect they will quickly get enough clue to fix their ACLs.
Add Eddy's suggestion that the addresses all end in .0 or .255 and you
have a fine machine for cleaning up a few old, irritating problems.
--
Jeff S Wheeler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
lacks is respect for the wishes and needs of its members.
--
Jeff S Wheeler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
for this off-topic posting.
--
Jeff S Wheeler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
or incapable networks, are a danger to
F and to our national infrastructure.
And while you're at it, renumber F into 69/8, preferably with the last
octet 0 or 255.
--
Jeff S Wheeler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
doesn't want web hosts as customers. :-)
--
Jeff S Wheeler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ms
11 172.20.148.22 (172.20.148.22) 25.150 ms
12 172.20.148.22 (172.20.148.22) 25.048 ms !A
I hope you don't mind my inquiry. Drop us a line if you think we can
help provide a stop-gap measure for the Cogent/AOL thing, or whatnot.
--
Jeff S Wheeler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sat, 2002-12-28 at 21
On Sun, 2002-12-29 at 15:57, Jeff S Wheeler wrote:
Basil,
Oops. Obviously, I posted this to the list by mistake.
But in any case, for those of you who are relying upon cogent pricing
to make your business model work, it should be easy to figure out that
at some point, you might start getting
. This will certainly break networks
which are low on operational clue, and force them to get fixed.
--
Jeff S Wheeler [EMAIL PROTECTED] 502-523-6989
', to approximate the route. I have tried this
option. Lots of routers, however, do not accept source routes. Any help
will be appreciated. Thanks.
No.
--
Jeff S Wheeler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
in that their root servers were unaffected.
Did I mis-perceive this, or is it another bold-faced lie from VeriSign?
--
Jeff S Wheeler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a legacy /16 more or less valuable as a
peer than a growing ISP with a few /20s, and presumably more eyeballs
and/or content behind them?
--
Jeff S Wheeler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, 2002-10-14 at 16:47, Ron da Silva wrote:
*snip*
Do any ISPs charge based on the number of announcements
argument, multicast backbones would be a
legal liability. How about a 1-800 conference circuit? The concept is
the same, as is the level of content participation. The difference is
the legal protection offered to the voice common-carrier is greater than
what is offered to IP carriers.
--
Jeff S
19 matches
Mail list logo
