Hi,
NAnt has been in 0.86 Beta version for two years. I guess time has
come to promote it to "Release" status? Many people are reluctant to
use software labeled "Beta", and grow even more suspicious when told
to install "nightly". Gert, would you care to comment please?
Regards,
Leszek 'skolima'
Hi,
enclosed is a (preliminary version of) patch changing NAnt to run
multiple targets in parallel (up to Environment.ProcessorCount * 2 +
1) while taking their dependencies into account. I will be grateful
for any improvement suggestions.
What I know to be broken:
- code formatting is messed up,
As I side effect, I have created a git clone of NAnt cvs repository at
http://github.com/skolima/NAnt/tree/master . I have also set up cron
job to pull changes from cvs into git once a day. My own
multithreaded-related changes aren't yet available through github, but
I should push them there shortl
csc task does this by default, if this doesn't work for you out of the
box, then you have something broken somwhere else...
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 6:20 PM, Rasmus Jelsgaard wrote:
> No worries - please let me know how it works out :)
>
> Regards,
> Rasmus Jelsgaard
>
> 2009/9/14 Lokhande, Manjus
Hi,
does anyone have a modified NAnt config that allows targeting
Silverlight 3.0? My attempts to create a new framework profile based
on SL 2.0 had so far failed misserably...
Regards,
Leszek 'skolima' Ciesielski
--
Co
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 4:23 AM, Charles Chan
wrote:
> Hello fellow developers,
>
> I am the newest addition to the NAnt developers team, let me provide a brief
> self introduction.
>
> Current Experience
> ==
> I am a senior software engineer & mobile team lead at my
> current employ
Last time I checked, DOxygen beat all other documentation generators
hands down. It had the documentation ready in 1/10 of the time the
other programs needed (for a code base larger than NAnt). It does,
however, look distinctly "doxygenic", which may be a show-stopper for
some people. On the other
egards,
> Charles
>
> --- On Wed, 3/10/10, Leszek Ciesielski wrote:
>
>> From: Leszek Ciesielski
>> Subject: Re: [nant-dev] NAnt delay on Mono/Linux Update (Aka: NDoc
>> Discussion)
>> To: "Ryan Boggs" , "Charles Chan"
>> , nant-develo
Hi,
I've implemented a task for capturing the execution of a NAnt build and
saving it (simplified) as a Visual Studio 2010 solution, so that subsequent
rebuilds can be done from the IDE. This should make debugging easier (just
hit F5 and you're done!). The tool is currently on github:
https://gith
I am curating https://github.com/skolima/NAnt git mirror and this is
problematic. Git 'cvsimport' command does not handle file deletions
(due to the broken way cvs itself records them), so nmake is still
present in the (automatically updated) mirror. I will push a commit
deleting the file, but I'm
On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 6:33 PM, Ryan Boggs wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 8:53 AM, Stefan Bodewig
> wrote:
>> On 2011-10-26, Ryan Boggs wrote:
>>
>>> Now that 0.91 final is out the door, I would like to start discussing
>>> what items to work on in both NAnt/NAntContrib. Attached is a
Does NAnt need the x86 config? Is there actually any P/Invoke code
that will break with the 'Any CPU' setting? I was under the impression
that there wasn't.
So the 'Debug|Any CPU' and 'Release|Any CPU' platforms should be enough.
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 5:50 PM, Ryan Boggs wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I
y are 32/64 bit safe[1].
[1]: MSDN article on the topic:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms973190.aspx
On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 1:00 AM, Brass Tilde wrote:
>> On Nov 14, 2011, at 8:53 AM, Leszek Ciesielski wrote:
>>
>>> Does NAnt need the x86 config? Is there actually
Hi,
NAnt has now migrated to git and has an official repository at
https://github.com/nant/nant . My cvs import at
https://github.com/skolima/NAnt will no longer receive updates as the
upstream cvs repository is now in read-only mode. Unfortunately, the
official import required rewriting of the hi
Hi everyone,
it seems that the task has regressed, throwing an exception when
only 'unless' condition is defined on it. It's simple to workaround
(just use test="${not (unlessCondition)}" instead ), but annoying none
the less. What's more, the task parsing exception thrown does not
contain any li
Jerome,
I don't suppose you could also re-write the code to use DotNetZip
instead of SharpZipLib? :-) The reason I'm mentioning this is because
1) DotNetZip is maintained, and SharpZipLib no longer seems to be
2) DotNetZip supports multithreaded zip compression, which is a huge
gain for practica
don't mind upgrading libs when applicable but I don't want to get into
> issues regarding lib licenses.
>
> Hope that makes sense.
>
> Thanks,
> Ryan
>
> On Dec 13, 2012, at 3:04 PM, Leszek Ciesielski wrote:
>
>> Jerome,
>>
>> I don'
ool prints 100K data
that is redirected to a file, printing to the console is a huge
slowdown)
The attached patch adds two attributes to the exec task: input and
quiet. Please consult the source for documentation.
Please comment, or, if everything is fine, commit.
Yours,
Leszek Ciesielski
--
M
works.org/browse/CCNET-830
Regards,
Leszek Ciesielski
using System;
using System.Collections.Generic;
using System.Text;
using System.Diagnostics;
using System.Threading;
namespace exit
{
class Program
{
static void Main(string[] args)
{
19 matches
Mail list logo
