My current artistic research explores the relationship between space and
time of places and space and time of information, or how our perceptions
of one and another are transformed through these relationships. This
research takes the shape of online digital pictures, photographs changed
by
/
From: Alan Sondheim sondh...@panix.com
Reply-To: NetBehaviour for networked distributed creativity
netbehaviour@netbehaviour.org
Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2010 23:40:22 -0400 (EDT)
To: NetBehaviour for networked distributed creativity
netbehaviour@netbehaviour.org
Subject: Re: [NetBehaviour] A statement
Hi Simon,
I'm just not sure what the word means at this point. It begins to sound
like ether. I tell people I'm a 'new media' artist - but that's a short-
cut that creates an odd sense of understanding that really has little
meaning. I'm more interested in what, if anything, we're mediated
I think your point about the notion of media specificity being unimportant
now, Simon, fails in certain ways. For instance, concerning net art, we see
zillions of grainy videos and kazoolians of textual blogs, these days, in a
TVification and blogification of the net. Because the technologies
too right
On 16 Mar 2010, at 19:28, Curt Cloninger wrote:
Hi all,
I would just chime in here and reference Benjamin's famous art in
the age of mechanical reproduction essay written way back in 1935.
He notes the difference between painting as stationary/unique/cult
object vs.
Hello...
Does anyone have a spare Bable fish ..
martin.
On 16 Mar 2010, at 17:50, Alan Sondheim wrote:
Hi - What I'm confused about here - hasn't this been worked over, say by
Daniel Buren's Five Texts or the group BPMT (Buren, Parmentier, Mosset,
Toroni) in the 70s? There's
distributed creativity
netbehaviour@netbehaviour.org
Subject: Re: [NetBehaviour] A statement
Brian..
Why is there an argument against me ... please lets not be so narrow minded.
How amazing you have completely misunderstood my point of view see other
links, I'm not supporting idea of pure painting
: Alan Sondheim sondh...@panix.com
Reply-To: NetBehaviour for networked distributed creativity
netbehaviour@netbehaviour.org
Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2010 13:50:35 -0400 (EDT)
To: NetBehaviour for networked distributed creativity
netbehaviour@netbehaviour.org
Subject: Re: [NetBehaviour] A statement
Hi - What
On Wed, 17 Mar 2010 11:40:17 +, Simon Biggs s.bi...@eca.ac.uk
wrote:
I don¹t think there currently is, nor will it be desirable in the future
to
have, a language specific to computer art.
It's unavoidable to a degree, with glitch art, livecoding, generative art,
net.art, etc. all having
: [NetBehaviour] A statement
Hi - What I'm confused about here - hasn't this been worked over, say by
Daniel Buren's Five Texts or the group BPMT (Buren, Parmentier, Mosset,
Toroni) in the 70s? There's always been a dialectic, sometimes dialog,
between painting as conservative and overdetermined, and more
Hi Rob,
Ywhat is so different with say (media art or whatever it is), is that,
it all comes from a different kind of place than the more linear, canon
of art history, so not only are we dealing with issues of language, we
are dealing with cultural paradigm shifts which declare alternative
netbehaviour@netbehaviour.org
Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2010 13:50:35 -0400 (EDT)
To: NetBehaviour for networked distributed creativity
netbehaviour@netbehaviour.org
Subject: Re: [NetBehaviour] A statement
Hi - What I'm confused about here - hasn't this been worked over, say by
Daniel Buren's Five Texts
2010 10:11:58 -0400
To: NetBehaviour for networked distributed creativity
netbehaviour@netbehaviour.org
Subject: Re: [NetBehaviour] A statement
On Wed, 17 Mar 2010 11:40:17 +, Simon Biggs s.bi...@eca.ac.uk wrote:
I don¹t think there currently is, nor will it be desirable in the future
to have
distributed creativity
netbehaviour@netbehaviour.org
Subject: Re: [NetBehaviour] A statement
Hi Alan, Once our histories and practice are owned by the powers that be,
then we will be allowed our own special place and key ;-) marcI think
there were times it - and other media - were thought
garrett marc.garr...@furtherfield.org
Reply-To: NetBehaviour for networked distributed creativity
netbehaviour@netbehaviour.org
Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2010 14:22:38 +
To: NetBehaviour for networked distributed creativity
netbehaviour@netbehaviour.org
Subject: Re: [NetBehaviour] A statement
Hi Rob
: *Wed, 17 Mar 2010 14:24:23 +
*To: *NetBehaviour for networked distributed creativity
netbehaviour@netbehaviour.org
*Subject: *Re: [NetBehaviour] A statement
Hi Alan, Once our histories and practice are owned by the powers that be,
then we will be allowed our own special place and key
@netbehaviour.org
*Subject: *Re: [NetBehaviour] A statement
Hi Alan, Once our histories and practice are owned by the powers
that be, then we will be allowed our own special place and key ;-)
marcI think there were times it - and other media - were
thought of as something
: [NetBehaviour] A statement
Hi Alan, Once our histories and practice are owned by the powers
that be, then we will be allowed our own special place and key ;-)
marcI think there were times it - and other media - were
thought of as something as, as determined
distributed creativity
netbehaviour@netbehaviour.org
Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2010 18:02:49 +
To: NetBehaviour for networked distributed creativity
netbehaviour@netbehaviour.org
Subject: Re: [NetBehaviour] A statement
Brian..
Why is there an argument against me ... please lets not be so narrow minded.
How
, 15 Mar 2010 23:43:59 +
To: NetBehaviour for networked distributed creativity
netbehaviour@netbehaviour.org
Subject: Re: [NetBehaviour] A statement
Simon.
There is a difference not a contradiction ...
To be more constructive there is an undeniable difference between painting
martinmitc...@mac.com
Reply-To: NetBehaviour for networked distributed creativity
netbehaviour@netbehaviour.org
Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2010 23:43:59 +
To: NetBehaviour for networked distributed creativity
netbehaviour@netbehaviour.org
Subject: Re: [NetBehaviour] A statement
Simon
Hi - What I'm confused about here - hasn't this been worked over, say by
Daniel Buren's Five Texts or the group BPMT (Buren, Parmentier, Mosset,
Toroni) in the 70s? There's always been a dialectic, sometimes dialog,
between painting as conservative and overdetermined, and more open
distributed creativity
netbehaviour@netbehaviour.org
Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2010 23:43:59 +
To: NetBehaviour for networked distributed creativity
netbehaviour@netbehaviour.org
Subject: Re: [NetBehaviour] A statement
Simon.
There is a difference not a contradiction
Hi all,
I would just chime in here and reference Benjamin's famous art in
the age of mechanical reproduction essay written way back in 1935.
He notes the difference between painting as stationary/unique/cult
object vs. photography and film as mobile/multiple/aura-emptied
object(s). Benjamin
Actually architecture and amazon.com make good sense - and these sorts of
extensions create a poetics of media.
As far as what's gained one way or another - gained is problematic; it
depends on whose gaining what why when where within what community etc.
etc. Calling my Second Life install a
photoshop and other apps use various often mixed metaphors. i use director
quite a bit. it's sort of like flash, an intermedia/multimedia authoring
platform. one makes 'movies' in it. they can be like 'movies' or they can be
interactive and you can skip around on the 'timeline'. the 'movies'
My work is about the evolution of painting in a networked environment,
both physical and digital, present and distant, in time and space. I
make what i call variable paintings. They address classical themes
such as Landscape or Still life. These paintings are not paintings in
the sense of
Hello.
Please separate the idea of painting from the creation of digital images it's a
contradiction and makes it difficult for people to understand what digital
artists are creating...
Martin Mitchell.
Crispy Nails Animation Studio.
http://www.crispynails.co.uk/
On 15 Mar 2010, at
does and how it works.
ja
http://vispo.com/dbcinema
- Original Message -
From: Yann Le Guennec i...@x-arn.org
To: NetBehaviour for networked distributed creativity
netbehaviour@netbehaviour.org
Sent: Monday, March 15, 2010 9:46 AM
Subject: Re: [NetBehaviour] A statement
Hello
: Re: [NetBehaviour] A statement
Hello,
Thanks for your feedback, maybe you're right. I'm thinking about
'painting' not from a technical point of view, involving some defined
kinds of support and materials, but from a more conceptual one, as
an historical and pictural practice in art
: [NetBehaviour] A statement
Hello,
Thanks for your feedback, maybe you're right. I'm thinking about
'painting' not from a technical point of view, involving some defined
kinds of support and materials, but from a more conceptual one, as
an historical and pictural practice in art. From
To: NetBehaviour for networked distributed creativity
Subject: Re: [NetBehaviour] A statement
So according to what you've been told, the good one (terminology) would
be a digital one, using terminology specific to technology (coding,
networks,...) ?
What i see in the way you use words
to
understand what dbCinema does and how it works.
ja http://vispo.com/dbcinema
- Original Message - From: Yann Le Guennec
i...@x-arn.org To: NetBehaviour for networked distributed
creativity netbehaviour@netbehaviour.org Sent: Monday, March 15,
2010 9:46 AM Subject: Re: [NetBehaviour
, March 15, 2010 9:46 AM
Subject: Re: [NetBehaviour] A statement
Hello,
Thanks for your feedback, maybe you're right. I'm thinking about
'painting' not from a technical point of view, involving some defined
kinds of support and materials, but from a more conceptual one, as
an historical
@netbehaviour.org
Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2010 15:52:56 +
To: NetBehaviour for networked distributed creativity
netbehaviour@netbehaviour.org
Subject: Re: [NetBehaviour] A statement
Hello.
Please separate the idea of painting from the creation of digital images
it's a contradiction and makes
So according to what you've been told, the good one (terminology) would
be a digital one, using terminology specific to technology (coding,
networks,...) ?
They didn't say what it should be. Just what it should not be. The
'painting', 'paint', 'brush', 'nib', 'palette', 'canvas' etc metaphors
@netbehaviour.org
Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2010 15:52:56 +
To: NetBehaviour for networked distributed creativity
netbehaviour@netbehaviour.org
Subject: Re: [NetBehaviour] A statement
Hello.
Please separate the idea of painting from the creation of digital images it's
a contradiction and makes
: [NetBehaviour] A statement
So according to what you've been told, the good one (terminology) would
be a digital one, using terminology specific to technology (coding,
networks,...) ?
What i see in the way you use words , and in your work, is a convergence
between painting and cinema
a poor man's linked-list sorting routine:
void
llist_sort(llist* ll)
{
lnode* ln = ll-head;
lnode* n = 0;
lnode* p = 0;
lnode* next = 0;
lnode* prev = 0;
while(ln) {
next = n = ln-next;
if (n) {
while(ll-cb_cmp(ln-data, n-data) 0) {
... Martin Kemp
Наслов: Hi nikola
Hi,
It is kind of you to have sent an invitation. I'm trying to keep a low profile
on here (really for family). I'm already inundated with messages and trying to
keep the situation under control. I hope you won't mind if were are just
friends in the general
...Hariti Rj Don't know what to say...
MANIK...JANUARY...2010...___
NetBehaviour mailing list
NetBehaviour@netbehaviour.org
http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
Lev Manovich
...OMG...LOL...
MANIK,DECEMEBER 2009...___
NetBehaviour mailing list
NetBehaviour@netbehaviour.org
http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
42 matches
Mail list logo
