Hi Dave,
This morphing is IMHO related to Brexit and an attempt to see how/if regulatory
divergence from continental Europe can be converted into an economic advantage.
The ofcom positions seem not really all that far from european regulations on
the fact level, while on a rhetorical level
I am still looking for the history of this morphing...
https://decoded.legal/blog/2023/10/ofcoms-new-guidance-on-open-internet--net-neutrality-including-zero-rating-and-traffic-management/
On Tue, Oct 31, 2023 at 9:33 AM Dave Taht wrote:
>
> This link is working now.
>
>
This link is working now.
https://www.ofcom.org.uk/consultations-and-statements/category-1/net-neutrality-review
I had reached out to multiple folk I knew to fix it. It is hugely
ironic that we have run into multiple examples of both intentional and
unintentional censorship so far in our quest
Regards
I wonder somewhat to what degree VF's motivation was closer to its own bottom
line (so having an additional service dimension to monetize) than trying to
help achieve its end-users latency desires...
And that is to a degree fine with me as an end-user... an ISP might as well
bill me
On 10/28/23, 06:01, "Nnagain on behalf of Sebastian Moeller via Nnagain"
For example, people who use high quality virtual reality applications may
> want to buy a premium quality service, while users who mainly stream and
> browse the internet can buy a cheaper package. Our updated guidance
Dear All,
I have been pointed at Ofcom's statement on Net neutrality for October 2023:
https://www.ofcom.org.uk/consultations-and-statements/category-1/net-neutrality-review
Here is the meat of that statement sans the links at the end (the email will be
clasified as spam if it contains too
