Hi Guðmundur (and Wim),
Guðmundur J. Kristjánsson wrote:
Hi all.
I think I am having the same (or at least a similar problem). I have
been using Context for a while now, always using references. This is the
first time experiencing this problem. I have tried:
Latest versions?
1)
Hi Taco!
On Mit, 20 Dez 2006, Taco Hoekwater wrote:
The cows fonts (inside cont-tmf) are cc-by-nd. TeXLive doesn't
like that, so perhaps the same is true for debian.
find . -name \*cow\* does not give me anything with 2006.12.21, is this
intended, or how are the fonts called ...
Best wishes
Norbert Preining wrote:
Hi Taco!
On Mit, 20 Dez 2006, Taco Hoekwater wrote:
The cows fonts (inside cont-tmf) are cc-by-nd. TeXLive doesn't
like that, so perhaps the same is true for debian.
find . -name \*cow\* does not give me anything with 2006.12.21, is this
intended, or how are
Hi all!
New upstream, new debian package 2006.12.21-0.1
deb(-src) http://www.tug.org/texlive/Debian/ context/
Missing before I can upload (will upload) to Debian:
- copyright file needs to be extended. I got the OK from Taco that
everything but the cows fonts are GPLv2 or PD, those
On Fre, 22 Dez 2006, Norbert Preining wrote:
New upstream, new debian package 2006.12.21-0.1
deb(-src) http://www.tug.org/texlive/Debian/ context/
Missing before I can upload (will upload) to Debian:
- copyright file needs to be extended. I got the OK from Taco that
everything but
On Fre, 22 Dez 2006, Taco Hoekwater wrote:
find . -name \*cow\* does not give me anything with 2006.12.21, is this
intended, or how are the fonts called ...
Try
find . -name koei\*
(koe == cow in dutch)
Ahh thanks, ok these fonts are gone. I will package anyway a
context-nonfree
On Friday 22 December 2006 02:29, Frank Küster wrote:
And, in particular, something which explains in 5 lines why one would
want to use ConTeXt instead of LaTeX.
My 2 cents:
Context has more coherent design, more control of page layout, more
choice of font sizes, more direct control of pretty
Norbert Preining [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all!
New upstream, new debian package 2006.12.21-0.1
deb(-src) http://www.tug.org/texlive/Debian/ context/
Missing before I can upload (will upload) to Debian:
- copyright file needs to be extended. I got the OK from Taco that
Hi all!
I re-repacked the stuff and now there are 2 packages:
context
context-nonfree
the content is quite easy: Everything from cont-tmf, cont-fnt, cont-ext,
cont-img is in context, BUT the list of files attached in
MANIFEST.nonfree which are in context-nonfree.
context suggests
On 12/22/06, Norbert Preining wrote:
Hi all!
You know what is coming ...
First statement: I would prefer to have context in Debian proper, but if
we cannot get anyway with this, putting all the stuff into the nonfree
section might be an option, although it doesn't sound right.
Ok, I made
Hi Norbert,
I had to go through this for TeXLive proper as well. Can't you
just ask Karl Berry cq. do what TexLive does (since it claims
to be Debian-compatible)?
Anyway, here is my list of remarks. I apologise beforehand if I
sound a bit unfriendly here or there, I do not completely agree
with
Dear Aditya
Thank you for your tip.
After adding the line \setupbackgrounds[header][text]
[bottomframe=on,topframe=on], I got lines of whole length.
However, [rule=on] option only draw vertical line as long as the
paragraph not to the bottom.
Please test once more using a short paragraph(3-4
On Fre, 22 Dez 2006, Norbert Preining wrote:
cont-img is in context, BUT the list of files attached in
MANIFEST.nonfree which are in context-nonfree.
Which is now attached ...
Best wishes
Norbert
---
Dr. Norbert
And, in particular, something which explains in 5 lines why one would
See Mike Bird.
want to use ConTeXt instead of LaTeX.
I use ConteXt for automatic-print-on-demand jobs.
from simple labels/stickers to complex multilanguage pricelists (i'm
in a print-hous)
I like for its object-oriented
Hi Taco!
On Fre, 22 Dez 2006, Taco Hoekwater wrote:
I had to go through this for TeXLive proper as well. Can't you
Oh, sorry I missed this. Was it on the tex-live list? If yes, then all
this is my fault, if no, hmm, still sorry.
Anyway, here is my list of remarks. I apologise beforehand if I
On Fri, 22 Dec 2006, Frank Küster wrote:
And, in particular, something which explains in 5 lines why one would
want to use ConTeXt instead of LaTeX.
The ConTeXt FAQ answers this question. The first one is a complete
explanation by Brooks Moses on c.t.t. while the second is a 5 line
Hi all!
On Fre, 22 Dez 2006, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
What are the differences between ConTeXt and LaTeX?
http://wiki.contextgarden.net/FAQ#What_are_the_differences_between_ConTeXt_and_LaTeX.3F
Thanks I included some text from it into the control file, ie
description:
Description: powerful TeX
Taco Hoekwater wrote:
No, they were not, and there is no missing source. The vf/tfm/map
were generated using the texfont program, which does not use source
files. The afms were created using ttf2afm, which uses ttfs as source.
concerning vf tfm and map files: in most cases they are kind of
Norbert Preining wrote:
if I, too, don't agree about the documentation stuff. In fact I
agree half-way: I want to have the source code, even if some commercial
fonts are missing etc and would still consider this DFSG free. In fact I
started a discussion about it some time ago, since I
Hi all!
Again, after all the helpful comments from Taco, Hans, Mojca, Aditya, I
have redone all the packaging:
context:
everything but the cow fonts and the tipsandtricks.pdf
context-nonfree:
cow fonts
a long list of pdfs from the web site:
aleph.pdf mfonts.pdf
Mojca Miklavec wrote:
ConTeXt doesn't use/need fontinst. I assume that all the files were
created only once by running texfont script once per each
font/encoding, most probably manually (although one could easily
once per encoding
texfont --encoding=texnansi --batch type-tmf.dat
etc
On Friday 22 December 2006 08:18, Norbert Preining wrote:
The main difference between ConTeXt and LaTeX lies in the fact that LaTeX
was created with the idea of separating content and presentation to such
an extent that the typical author would write their content and then use
a style file
Latexstualists may disagree but I think the essence is that Context
gives more control and makes it easier to create new layouts.
Also the ConTeXt parts are more integrated than the LaTeX packages are
-- think of the discussions/comments about what order LaTeX packages
must be loaded. For
sorry for being a bit slow on answering mail .. the usual end of year
deadlines and such delay me
Hans
--
-
Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The
On Sat, 23 Dec 2006, Jeong Dalyoung wrote:
However, [rule=on] option only draw vertical line as long as the
paragraph not to the bottom.
Do you mean you want a line in the middle of the columns for the
entire page, even if the text does not fill the whole page? I do not
think \startcolumns
Hi Norbert,
Norbert Preining wrote:
Sure, but only if you can promise this *will be* the end of it.
Otherwise, it only adds even more of a hassle (it seems whatever
we do, it is never quite enough).
To be honest: This is the way MOST projects go. And with a statement
like this Debian
Aditya Mahajan wrote:
On Sat, 23 Dec 2006, Jeong Dalyoung wrote:
However, [rule=on] option only draw vertical line as long as the
paragraph not to the bottom.
Do you mean you want a line in the middle of the columns for the
entire page, even if the text does not fill the whole page? I
On Fri, 22 Dec 2006, Sanjoy Mahajan wrote:
Latexstualists may disagree but I think the essence is that Context
gives more control and makes it easier to create new layouts.
Also the ConTeXt parts are more integrated than the LaTeX packages are
-- think of the discussions/comments about
28 matches
Mail list logo
