On 12/4/2012 10:01 PM, Otared Kavian wrote:
On 4 déc. 2012, at 17:38, Hans Hagen pra...@wxs.nl wrote:
concerning the bug reports …
Hi Hans,
Thank you for the fixes and adding the commands \notin and \imply: I did some
testing with your examples and others of my own, and it seems that some
Dear Otared,
I tested your sample and it works well.
\notin also works with \enablemode[lmmath] too.
I also agree with your comment on the size of the integrals.
Best regards,
Dalyoung
___
If your question is of
On Mon, Dec 03, 2012 at 09:07:43PM +0100, Hans Hagen wrote:
On 11/30/2012 10:26 AM, Jeong Dal wrote:
Hi,
After updating ConTeXt, math command '\not\in' is not shown properly.
For example,
$a \not\eq b$ is good.
but $a \not\in A$ shows two symbols separately.
I am using Mac OS X
On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 4:18 PM, Khaled Hosny khaledho...@eglug.org wrote:
On Mon, Dec 03, 2012 at 09:07:43PM +0100, Hans Hagen wrote:
On 11/30/2012 10:26 AM, Jeong Dal wrote:
Hi,
After updating ConTeXt, math command '\not\in' is not shown properly.
For example,
$a \not\eq b$ is good.
On 12/4/2012 4:33 PM, luigi scarso wrote:
If I recall correctly, a glyph with zero width give an invalid pdf/a-1.
yes, and we took (take) care of that
-
Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
On 12/4/2012 4:18 PM, Khaled Hosny wrote:
The main issue here is that \not in was largely a hack in CM fonts, the
glyph was specially crafted so that it overlays the next symbol by
having zero width and -ve right side bearing and it was centered over
equal and similar symbols, anything with
On 4 déc. 2012, at 17:38, Hans Hagen pra...@wxs.nl wrote:
concerning the bug reports …
Hi Hans,
Thank you for the fixes and adding the commands \notin and \imply: I did some
testing with your examples and others of my own, and it seems that some of the
issues are fixed.
However with
On 11/30/2012 10:26 AM, Jeong Dal wrote:
Hi,
After updating ConTeXt, math command '\not\in' is not shown properly.
For example,
$a \not\eq b$ is good.
but $a \not\in A$ shows two symbols separately.
I am using Mac OS X 10.8 and the versions of LuaTex and ConTeXt are
This is LuaTeX,
Hi Hans, Hi Jeong Dal,
On November 21st I reported this issue and others with the new versions of mkiv
where math characters are treated with a new method.
Indeed the issue appears with Latin Modern and their new implementation.
However with some fonts the behaviour is correct but the size of
On 12/3/2012 10:26 PM, Otared Kavian wrote:
Hi Hans, Hi Jeong Dal,
On November 21st I reported this issue and others with the new versions of mkiv
where math characters are treated with a new method.
Indeed the issue appears with Latin Modern and their new implementation.
However with some
Dear Hans,
I thought that it is not delivered to the list because I didn't see it, but you
read the mail.
I also found that it is already reported by Otared before.
I checked the latest beta, ConTeXt ver: 2012.12.03 20:57 MKIV, and it is fixed.
Thank you for your concern.
Best regards,
Hi,
After updating ConTeXt, math command '\not\in' is not shown properly.
For example,
$a \not\eq b$ is good.
but $a \not\in A$ shows two symbols separately.
I am using Mac OS X 10.8 and the versions of LuaTex and ConTeXt are
This is LuaTeX, Version beta-0.70.2-2012052309 (TeX Live 2012)
12 matches
Mail list logo