Otared Kavian wrote :
Hi David and all ConTeXters,
I was away from my e-mail so I am late in answering.
Thank you for the file you put on your site. Indeed everything works
as intended (the \placeformula no longer advances with each step),
and I think one may suggest to Hans to include
David Munger wrote:
I'm sorry, I'm no TeX/ConTeXt guru and I really have no idea of how to
achieve this. I think now we need Hans' help.
I haven't followed the discussion so closely, what is the problem?
Good point! Here's the fix (file updated on my website):
37c37
Hans Hagen wrote :
David Munger wrote:
I'm sorry, I'm no TeX/ConTeXt guru and I really have no idea of how to
achieve this. I think now we need Hans' help.
I haven't followed the discussion so closely, what is the problem?
We're trying to implement steps-without-JavaScript for slides.
At 12:08 -0500 10/11/04, David Munger wrote:
I'm sorry, I'm no TeX/ConTeXt guru and I really have no idea of how to
achieve this. I think now we need Hans' help.
I have indeed noticed that enclosing an operator between braces breaks
the spacing system. Try, for instance:
Yes you are right! This is
At 19:25 +0100 10/11/04, Vit Zyka wrote:
Hi Otared,
I can give only explanation but in the moment i do not know the
automatic solution.
Hi Vit,
Thank you for your insight. It is right that the same problem appears
in Plain TeX, that is a binary operator within a pair of braces seems
to loose
At 19:57 -0500 7/11/04, David Munger wrote:
Oh sorry for not being clear about it. I was assuming that some
presentation module would be imported, for instance:
\usemodule[pre-original]
So probably there lacks a \page command in your \Subject definition.
About the \[ and \]: you're right. I was
Otared Kavian wrote :
Hi David,
Thanks for the details. Indeed I get now what is expected from your
macros, and as a matter of fact the result is much much better than
that of my crude macros... You did a great improvement!
So I am going to use yours from now on: thanks again!
If I can
At 13:01 -0500 8/11/04, David Munger wrote:
Excellent idea indeed! Here's the fix. It is obviously not optimal,
though it allows for multiple formula numbers on the same slide. Try it
with:
texexec --pdf --mode=demo t-rsteps
Thanks for your advice.
Hi David,
I could not get through the example
Otared Kavian wrote :
Hi David,
I could not get through the example file: here is what I get:
Argh... It's because of the line splits in email. I just put the file on
my website:
http://cfd.homelinux.org/tex/
Regards,
David
___
ntg-context
At 3:07 -0500 6/11/04, David Munger wrote:
Hi all,
Inspiring from Otared Kavian's code and Han's presentation styles with
support for steps, I cooked the following in order to solve the non
JavaScript version issue. I post it in case it could be useful to other
people.
This implementation supports
Otared Kavian wrote :
Hi David, Hi all Contexters,
Sorry for being late in answering.
I just tried to test your code but did not succeed in showing things
step by step, even after adding:
\def\Subject#1{\centerline{\bf #1}}
\setuppapersize [S6][S6]
\setupcolors[state=start]
and
Hi all,
Inspiring from Otared Kavian's code and Han's presentation styles with
support for steps, I cooked the following in order to solve the non
JavaScript version issue. I post it in case it could be useful to other
people.
This implementation supports an \{Only|From|Until}Step[n] syntax as
At 18:38 -0500 2/11/04, David Munger wrote:
I think the latest Acrobat Reader version for Linux is 5.0.9. I guess
this means I should forget about steps. Thanks anyway.
David
Hi David,
A few months ago I had to use steps in my presentations, but since I
could not use thouroughly s-pre-60.tex (and
Hi Otared,
Thanks a lot for you macros. They do the job pretty well. They remind me
of the way Prosper does things. When I have time, I'll try to find out
how to Wiki your post. Thanks again!
David
Otared Kavian wrote :
Hi David,
A few months ago I had to use steps in my presentations, but
Henning Hraban Ramm wrote:
Am 02.11.2004 um 07:04 schrieb David Munger:
Could someone tell me if I'm doing something bad here, please?
File test.tex
---
\usemodule[pre-original]
\starttext
\Subject{Test}
step 1
\presentationstep
step 2
\stoptext
Nothing seems to work here. I'm afraid the problem is indeed that
Acrobat Reader under Linux is not really JavaScript aware...
Would it be possible to implement the steps commands such that steps
span over multiple slides instead of being managed by JavaScript?
David
Le mardi 02 novembre 2004
David Munger wrote:
Nothing seems to work here. I'm afraid the problem is indeed that
Acrobat Reader under Linux is not really JavaScript aware...
Would it be possible to implement the steps commands such that steps
span over multiple slides instead of being managed by JavaScript?
try
texexec
Le 2 nov. 04, à 23:22, David Munger a écrit :
Nothing seems to work here. I'm afraid the problem is indeed that
Acrobat Reader under Linux is not really JavaScript aware...
Would it be possible to implement the steps commands such that steps
span over multiple slides instead of being managed by
Hi,
Could someone tell me if I'm doing something bad here, please?
File test.tex
---
\usemodule[pre-original]
\starttext
\Subject{Test}
step 1
\presentationstep
step 2
\stoptext
---
texexec --mode=step --output=pdf test.tex
This gives me a
Am 02.11.2004 um 07:04 schrieb David Munger:
Could someone tell me if I'm doing something bad here, please?
File test.tex
---
\usemodule[pre-original]
\starttext
\Subject{Test}
step 1
\presentationstep
step 2
\stoptext
---
texexec --mode=step
Hi,
I have tried every combination of presentationstep and the NextStep
button in pre-fuzzy presentation style, and nothing seems to work. I
have the latest (ConTeXt ver: 2003.9.25 fmt: 2003.9.26 int: english
mes: english) running on Mac OS X (10.2.8) with Gierben Wierda's teTex
21 matches
Mail list logo
