Re: [NTG-context] Build for Alpine Linux

On 04/17/2018 05:25 PM, Arthur Reutenauer wrote: I can’t test musl support, but the new code should avoid the problem Thomas experienced. Best, Arthur I haven't had any trouble so far but need to test with another computer, tonight. Thomas

Re: [NTG-context] Build for Alpine Linux

On Fri, 13 Apr 2018, Henning Hraban Ramm wrote: Am 2018-04-13 um 13:42 schrieb Henri Menke : Exactly. We have that. And most bits and pieces are in place to allow that, except for the problem with mtxrun not being able to determine the platform correctly. Actually, the

Re: [NTG-context] Build for Alpine Linux

Am 2018-04-13 um 13:42 schrieb Henri Menke : >> Exactly. We have that. And most bits and pieces are in place to allow >> that, except for the problem with mtxrun not being able to determine >> the platform correctly. > > Actually, the musl detection only has to be peformed

Re: [NTG-context] Build for Alpine Linux

On 4/13/2018 1:14 PM, Mojca Miklavec wrote: On 11 April 2018 at 22:37, Hans Hagen wrote: On 4/11/2018 10:08 PM, Brian Hunt wrote: 3. Add texlua (and texluac?) to a. the setup rsync bin/ directories b. the tex/texmf-linuxmusl(|-ppc|-64) we don't use texluac, don't need texlua on

Re: [NTG-context] Build for Alpine Linux

On 04/13/2018 11:14 PM, Mojca Miklavec wrote: > On 11 April 2018 at 22:37, Hans Hagen wrote: >> On 4/11/2018 10:08 PM, Brian Hunt wrote: >> >>> 3. Add texlua (and texluac?) to >>>a. the setup rsync bin/ directories >>>b. the tex/texmf-linuxmusl(|-ppc|-64) >> >> we don't use texluac, don't

Re: [NTG-context] Build for Alpine Linux

On 11 April 2018 at 22:37, Hans Hagen wrote: > On 4/11/2018 10:08 PM, Brian Hunt wrote: > >> 3. Add texlua (and texluac?) to >>a. the setup rsync bin/ directories >>b. the tex/texmf-linuxmusl(|-ppc|-64) > > we don't use texluac, don't need texlua on windows and on linux texlua is > just a

Re: [NTG-context] Build for Alpine Linux

For those interested in reproducing the issues experienced on Alpine, I've published an image that you should be able to start with: $ docker run -ti brianmhunt/context-alpine:demo (You can see the Dockerfile etc here: https://hub.docker.com/r/brianmhunt/context-alpine/) That image applies the

Re: [NTG-context] Build for Alpine Linux

On Wed, 2018-04-11 at 20:08 +, Brian Hunt wrote: > So here's what I've got for a TODO so far to get ConTeXt working on Alpine > Linux with musl (subject to item #6, mtx-context.lua not being found): > > 1. Add the musl test to first-setup.sh > 2. Add the same musl test to tex/setuptex > 3.

Re: [NTG-context] Build for Alpine Linux

Aditya: I did indeed; it fails with `mtxrun | unknown script 'base.lua' or 'mtx-base.lua'` (sorry I didn't report this). Hans: > if musl needs different bin then there should be a different initial > download i think because basically we're now talking of: windows, osx, > linux,

Re: [NTG-context] Build for Alpine Linux

On 4/11/2018 10:08 PM, Brian Hunt wrote: So here's what I've got for a TODO so far to get ConTeXt working on Alpine Linux with musl (subject to item #6, mtx-context.lua not being found): 1. Add the musl test to first-setup.sh 2. Add the same musl test to tex/setuptex no problem adding a

Re: [NTG-context] Build for Alpine Linux

On Wed, 11 Apr 2018, Brian Hunt wrote: 6. `context` is unable to locate `mtx-context.lua`. Some tracker output sheds some light: Have you run luatools --generate Aditya ___ If your question is of interest to

Re: [NTG-context] Build for Alpine Linux

So here's what I've got for a TODO so far to get ConTeXt working on Alpine Linux with musl (subject to item #6, mtx-context.lua not being found): 1. Add the musl test to first-setup.sh 2. Add the same musl test to tex/setuptex 3. Add texlua (and texluac?) to a. the setup rsync bin/ directories

Re: [NTG-context] Build for Alpine Linux

> That’s what I was saying. But you seemed to imply that grep -F 'musl' > was preferable to grep -E '^musl' from a portability and robustness > point of view. Sorry if I was unclear; `grep -F` is preferable to `fgrep` since the latter is less portable, and `grep -F` may be preferable to `-E`

Re: [NTG-context] Build for Alpine Linux

On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 11:05:12AM +, Brian Hunt wrote: >> The caret in itself was not the problem, only that it was not escaped >> for the shell. Testing a regexp, with -E of course, is just as robust, >> and allows us to be more specific about what we test. > > Either is fine I am sure

Re: [NTG-context] Build for Alpine Linux

On Tue, 10 Apr 2018 11:05:12 + Brian Hunt wrote: > from a code maintenance and testing > perspective I'd be more concerned about a regression or > misinterpretation to an unescaped carat that breaks the detection on > zsh Doesn't *everybody* use zsh? ;-)

Re: [NTG-context] Build for Alpine Linux

A few more notes: 1. Missing texlua - found The missing `texlua` from `bin/` and `tex/texmf-linuxmusl-64/bin` appears to be a problem originating at the rsync source, notably it appears that `texlua` is missing from these paths: http://standalone.contextgarden.net/setup/linuxmusl-64/

Re: [NTG-context] Build for Alpine Linux

> The caret in itself was not the problem, only that it was not escaped > for the shell. Testing a regexp, with -E of course, is just as robust, > and allows us to be more specific about what we test. Either is fine I am sure, but from a code maintenance and testing perspective I'd be more

Re: [NTG-context] Build for Alpine Linux

> A few notes: > a.) On some platforms fgrep has been deprecated (in favour of `grep -F`) so > it's not future-proof I don’t think the aliases fgrep and egrep have ever been supposed to be portable. POSIX has grep -F and grep -E, and that’s what we should use. > b.) The caret (^) passed to

Re: [NTG-context] Build for Alpine Linux

Here are a couple experimental observations. 1. Detecting musl. -- Alpine Linux/sh -- $ ldd --version 2>&1 | grep -F musl musl libc (x86_64) $? = 0 -- Debian/bash -- $ ldd --version 2>&1 | grep -F musl (nothing; $? = 1) -- Debian/zsh -- $ ldd --version 2>&1 | grep -F musl (nothing; $? = 1) A

Re: [NTG-context] Build for Alpine Linux

On Sun, 2018-04-08 at 22:50 +0200, Mojca Miklavec wrote: > Dear Brian, > > On 8 April 2018 at 16:56, Brian Hunt wrote: > > > > Hello everyone, > > > > Per this question on tex.StackOverflow, I am having trouble getting ConTeXt > > (LuaTeX specifically) to run on Alpine Linux: > > > >

Re: [NTG-context] Build for Alpine Linux

On Mon, Apr 09, 2018 at 09:26:35AM +1200, Henri Menke wrote: > This only blows up on Zsh.  I will contact the "config.guess" maintainer (from > where I stole that snippet). The unescaped caret is only a problem on zsh with EXTENDED_GLOB activated, but the effect of grep -q is problematic, and

Re: [NTG-context] Build for Alpine Linux

On Sun, 2018-04-08 at 22:50 +0200, Mojca Miklavec wrote: > Dear Brian, > > On 8 April 2018 at 16:56, Brian Hunt wrote: > > > > Hello everyone, > > > > Per this question on tex.StackOverflow, I am having trouble getting ConTeXt > > (LuaTeX specifically) to run on Alpine Linux: > > > >

Re: [NTG-context] Build for Alpine Linux

On Sun, Apr 08, 2018 at 10:50:16PM +0200, Mojca Miklavec wrote: > I need to finish "parsing" > https://mailman.ntg.nl/pipermail/ntg-context/2018/091123.html I was wondering if anyone had paid attention to that :-) I realise the explanation is a bit long, but there were many details and I

Re: [NTG-context] Build for Alpine Linux

Dear Brian, On 8 April 2018 at 16:56, Brian Hunt wrote: > Hello everyone, > > Per this question on tex.StackOverflow, I am having trouble getting ConTeXt > (LuaTeX specifically) to run on Alpine Linux: > > https://tex.stackexchange.com/questions/425463 > > Specifically, the build from ConTeXt

[NTG-context] Build for Alpine Linux

Hello everyone, Per this question on tex.StackOverflow, I am having trouble getting ConTeXt (LuaTeX specifically) to run on Alpine Linux: https://tex.stackexchange.com/questions/425463 Specifically, the build from ConTeXt standalone has a LuaTeX that seems not to run against the musl libc6