Re: [NTG-context] Difference in doifinset in MkII and MkIV

2011-10-15 Thread Hans Hagen
On 15-10-2011 03:13, Aditya Mahajan wrote: On Wed, 21 Sep 2011, Wolfgang Schuster wrote: Am 21.09.2011 um 05:20 schrieb Aditya Mahajan: The following works in MkIV but fails in MkIV: \unprotect \def\!!yesandon{yes,on} \doifinsetelse{yes}\!!yesandon

Re: [NTG-context] Difference in doifinset in MkII and MkIV

2011-10-15 Thread Aditya Mahajan
On Sat, 15 Oct 2011, Hans Hagen wrote: On 15-10-2011 03:13, Aditya Mahajan wrote: On Wed, 21 Sep 2011, Wolfgang Schuster wrote: Am 21.09.2011 um 05:20 schrieb Aditya Mahajan: The following works in MkIV but fails in MkIV: \unprotect \def\!!yesandon{yes,on} \doifinsetelse{yes}\!!yesandon

Re: [NTG-context] Difference in doifinset in MkII and MkIV

2011-10-14 Thread Aditya Mahajan
On Wed, 21 Sep 2011, Wolfgang Schuster wrote: Am 21.09.2011 um 05:20 schrieb Aditya Mahajan: The following works in MkIV but fails in MkIV: \unprotect \def\!!yesandon{yes,on} \doifinsetelse{yes}\!!yesandon \ExpandSecondAfter\doifinsetelse{yes}\!!yesandon It’s awkward but this how it works

Re: [NTG-context] Difference in doifinset in MkII and MkIV

2011-09-21 Thread Wolfgang Schuster
Am 21.09.2011 um 05:20 schrieb Aditya Mahajan: The following works in MkIV but fails in MkIV: \unprotect \def\!!yesandon{yes,on} \doifinsetelse{yes}\!!yesandon \ExpandSecondAfter\doifinsetelse{yes}\!!yesandon It’s awkward but this how it works in MkII. Wolfgang

[NTG-context] Difference in doifinset in MkII and MkIV

2011-09-20 Thread Aditya Mahajan
The following works in MkIV but fails in MkIV: \unprotect \def\!!yesandon{yes,on} \doifinsetelse{yes}\!!yesandon {\writestatus{TEST}{YES}} {\writestatus{TEST}{NO}} \protect This can be fixed by changing the definition \def\p!doifinsetelse#1#2#3#4% {\donefalse