On Tue, 22 Mar 2011, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
On Tue, 22 Mar 2011, Hans Hagen wrote:
so i changed it a bit in the next beta .. i also made middle the default
location
Thank you. I will document all this in the next TUGBoat article on Context
for users.
On 21-3-2011 5:08, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
Am 21.03.2011 um 00:43 schrieb Aditya Mahajan:
About two months back I had requested that the second argument be made
optional. Hans had implemented that request, but it does not always work (I
don't know if this is a regression over the original
On Tue, 22 Mar 2011, Hans Hagen wrote:
On 21-3-2011 5:08, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
Am 21.03.2011 um 00:43 schrieb Aditya Mahajan:
About two months back I had requested that the second argument be made
optional. Hans had implemented that request, but it does not always work
(I don't know if
2011/3/22 Aditya Mahajan adit...@umich.edu
well, it works if one specifies [A5][samesize]
Yes, but [A5][A5] is simpler than [A5][samesize] :)
With the former if the size changes to A6, you only have to change one
thing. So in light of maintenance it is better.
--
Cecil Westerhof
Hi Aditya,Testing your minimal example:\setuppapersize[A5]\showframe\starttext\dorecurse{10}{\input knuth \endgraf}\stoptextit seems that I do get an A5 papersize (ConTeXt version2011.02.25 22:03, andLuaTeX, Version beta-0.65.0-2010121316). I attach the PDF file for your information (since I don't
the desired size by using only one argument. +1 for change.
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Aditya Mahajan [mailto:adit...@umich.edu]
Gesendet: Montag, 21. März 2011 00:43
An: mailing list for ConTeXt users
Betreff: Re: [NTG-context] Feature request: setuppapersize
On Sun, 20 Mar 2011
Am 21.03.2011 um 00:43 schrieb Aditya Mahajan:
About two months back I had requested that the second argument be made
optional. Hans had implemented that request, but it does not always work (I
don't know if this is a regression over the original implemenetation, or it
never worked
On Mon, 21 Mar 2011, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
Am 21.03.2011 um 00:43 schrieb Aditya Mahajan:
About two months back I had requested that the second argument be made
optional. Hans had implemented that request, but it does not always work (I
don't know if this is a regression over the
An: mailing list for ConTeXt users
Betreff: Re: [NTG-context] Feature request: setuppapersize
On Mon, 10 Jan 2011, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
On Mon, 10 Jan 2011, Hans Hagen wrote:
more elegant and downward compatible is this:
\definepapersize
[samesized]
[ \c!width=\paperwidth,
\c
On Sun, 20 Mar 2011, C. wrote:
Did you try \setuppapersize[A5][A5] ?
According to http://wiki.contextgarden.net/Reference/en/setuppapersize
second argument (the print paper size) is A4 by default.
About two months back I had requested that the second argument be made
optional. Hans had
On Mon, 10 Jan 2011, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
On Mon, 10 Jan 2011, Hans Hagen wrote:
more elegant and downward compatible is this:
\definepapersize
[samesized]
[ \c!width=\paperwidth,
\c!height=\paperheight]
\setuppapersize
[A4][samesized]
in page-lay.mkiv
Indeed. This will also work
On 22-1-2011 5:34, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
On Mon, 10 Jan 2011, Hans Hagen wrote:
more elegant and downward compatible is this:
\definepapersize
[samesized]
[ \c!width=\paperwidth,
\c!height=\paperheight]
\setuppapersize
[A4][samesized]
in page-lay.mkiv
Can this also be added to
On Mon, 10 Jan 2011, Hans Hagen wrote:
more elegant and downward compatible is this:
\definepapersize
[samesized]
[ \c!width=\paperwidth,
\c!height=\paperheight]
\setuppapersize
[A4][samesized]
in page-lay.mkiv
Can this also be added to page-lay.mkii. Will make it much easier to
On 9-1-2011 12:45, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
Hans,
Since we have some leverage with backward compatibility in MkIV, can we
make \setuppapersize (slightly) more intuitive.
Normally, one would expect
\setuppapersize[A5]
to be equivalent to
\setuppapersize[A5][A5]
but currently it is equivalent
Hans Hagen pra...@wxs.nl writes:
What do you think?
\setuppapersize
[A4][samesized]
Not really an improvement over \setuppapersize[A4][A4] ...
--
Peter Münster
Contact information: http://pmrb.free.fr/contact/
On 10-1-2011 3:04, Peter Münster wrote:
Hans Hagenpra...@wxs.nl writes:
What do you think?
\setuppapersize
[A4][samesized]
Not really an improvement over \setuppapersize[A4][A4] ...
why not?
-
Hans Hagen pra...@wxs.nl writes:
On 10-1-2011 3:04, Peter Münster wrote:
Hans Hagenpra...@wxs.nl writes:
What do you think?
\setuppapersize
[A4][samesized]
Not really an improvement over \setuppapersize[A4][A4] ...
why not?
Just my personal opinion: more keystrokes to type and
On 10-1-2011 4:20, Peter Münster wrote:
Hans Hagenpra...@wxs.nl writes:
On 10-1-2011 3:04, Peter Münster wrote:
Hans Hagenpra...@wxs.nl writes:
What do you think?
\setuppapersize
[A4][samesized]
Not really an improvement over \setuppapersize[A4][A4] ...
why not?
Just my
Hans Hagen pra...@wxs.nl writes:
\setuppapersize
[A4][samesized]
Not really an improvement over \setuppapersize[A4][A4] ...
i guess you didn't try it as suggested ... when set up this way the second
argument defaults to samesize unless set otherwise
Right! I thought the
On Mon, 10 Jan 2011, Hans Hagen wrote:
more elegant and downward compatible is this:
\definepapersize
[samesized]
[ \c!width=\paperwidth,
\c!height=\paperheight]
\setuppapersize
[A4][samesized]
in page-lay.mkiv
Indeed. This will also work fine.
Thanks,
Aditya
Hans,
Since we have some leverage with backward compatibility in MkIV, can we
make \setuppapersize (slightly) more intuitive.
Normally, one would expect
\setuppapersize[A5]
to be equivalent to
\setuppapersize[A5][A5]
but currently it is equivalent to
\setuppapersize[A5][A4]
21 matches
Mail list logo