[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This version runs the ruby scripts directly, rather than the suggested
form, e.g., texfmstart pstopdf.rb file.ps. I have no idea if that
is intended to work -- it did in my very simple tests . I'm not sure
the RUBYLIB line is needed.
when you use texmfstart to
There are two classes of users:
1) most error messages are ignored up to and including the ones that
promise global thermonuclear war if you click on Yes, or
2) minor warnings bring all work to a halt until explained.
In honor of the latter class, who ask about the suggestion to use
texstart
