On 9/26/22 16:44, Willi Egger via ntg-context wrote:
> Hi Pablo,
>
> Hraban refers to Paulo Ney de Souza from US. He recently joined the
> ConTeXt meeting and indeed he mentioned that TUG had a fund raising
> campaign which was successful.
Many thanks for your replies, Hraban and Willi.
Pablo
Hi Pablo,
Hraban refers to Paulo Ney de Souza from US. He recently joined the ConTeXt
meeting and indeed he mentioned that TUG had a fund raising campaign which was
successful.
Kind regards
Willi
> On 23 Sep 2022, at 17:23, Pablo Rodriguez via ntg-context
> wrote:
>
> On 9/22/22 20:07,
On 9/25/22 17:24, juh via ntg-context wrote:
> Am Thu, Sep 22, 2022 at 06:47:50PM -0600 schrieb Max Chernoff via ntg-context:
>> I think that pdf.js (the Firefox PDF viewer) meets most of these
>> requirements. There are a few requirements that it doesn't meet, but
>> it's open source and written
Am Thu, Sep 22, 2022 at 06:47:50PM -0600 schrieb Max Chernoff via ntg-context:
> I think that pdf.js (the Firefox PDF viewer) meets most of these
> requirements. There are a few requirements that it doesn't meet, but
> it's open source and written in JavaScript, so we should be able to add
>
On 9/23/22 12:18, Max Chernoff via ntg-context wrote:
>> Unfortunately, Firefox doesn’t register itself as a PDF viewer (at
>> least on MacOS), that means I can’t use it easily to open a PDF
>> from the command line (e.g. in scripts).
>
> That's odd. You can set it as the default PDF viewer on
On 23 Sep 2022, at 08:59, Henning Hraban Ramm via ntg-context
wrote:
>
> Unfortunately, Firefox doesn’t register itself as a PDF viewer (at least on
> MacOS), that means I can’t use it easily to open a PDF from the command line
> (e.g. in scripts).
The following works for me in Monterey on
On 9/22/22 20:07, Henning Hraban Ramm via ntg-context wrote:
> […]
> I suggest we’ll discuss funding in the context group board, but there
> was also a discussion about fundraising at the 2022 meeting that I
> didn’t follow – I think Paulo said he had experience in fundraising?
Hi Hraban,
sorry
Hi Hraban,
> Unfortunately, Firefox doesn’t register itself as a PDF viewer (at least
> on MacOS), that means I can’t use it easily to open a PDF from the
> command line (e.g. in scripts).
That's odd. You can set it as the default PDF viewer on Windows and
Linux at least.
> >> for forms:
>
On Thu, Sep 22, 2022 at 8:08 PM Henning Hraban Ramm via ntg-context <
ntg-context@ntg.nl> wrote:
> Hi all,
> I compiled a kind of wishlist what we need or look for in a new or
> enhanced open source PDF viewer, as discussed e.g. at the 2021 meeting.
>
> https://wiki.contextgarden.net/PDF_viewer
>
Am 23.09.22 um 02:47 schrieb Max Chernoff:
I compiled a kind of wishlist what we need or look for in a new or
enhanced open source PDF viewer, as discussed e.g. at the 2021 meeting.
https://wiki.contextgarden.net/PDF_viewer
Feel free to enhance the wiki page or discuss here.
I think that
On Thu, 22 Sep 2022 18:47:50 -0600
Max Chernoff via ntg-context wrote:
> I've been using pdf.js almost exclusively for the past few years
> either via Firefox or VS Code, and I've never really had any
> problems. The only real issue that I've had is that it gets fairly
> slow with documents over
Hi Hraban,
> I compiled a kind of wishlist what we need or look for in a new or
> enhanced open source PDF viewer, as discussed e.g. at the 2021 meeting.
>
> https://wiki.contextgarden.net/PDF_viewer
>
> Feel free to enhance the wiki page or discuss here.
I think that pdf.js (the Firefox PDF
Hi all,
I compiled a kind of wishlist what we need or look for in a new or
enhanced open source PDF viewer, as discussed e.g. at the 2021 meeting.
https://wiki.contextgarden.net/PDF_viewer
I’d like to further the subject to find a developer (or a team) and make
this a reality. (Of course I’d
On 10/20/2019 10:15 PM, Marcin Borkowski wrote:
Maybe Lua is, but every scriptable program is a risk.
LuaTeX and write18 _are_ dangerous.
It would be very easy to spread malicious TeX code, since everyone uses CTAN
(LaTeX) packages without checking them first.
But it wouldn’t come far, I
On 2019-10-19, at 12:21, Henning Hraban Ramm wrote:
>> Am 2019-10-15 um 08:17 schrieb Marcin Borkowski :
Basically javascript can be limited to (1) setting annotation properties,
like toggling layers or button renditions, and (2) some simple
calculations (for forms).
Hi, nice to read you again!
(BTW what’s the state of Husayni fonts?)
> Am 2019-10-15 um 06:58 schrieb Hamid,Idris :
>
> As a commercial replacement to Adobe Acroboat, nothing beats NitroPDF.
> Clean interface. Avoids most if not all of the problems mentioned by Hans.
I can’t check it out
> Am 2019-10-19 um 12:51 schrieb Hans Hagen :
>
> On 10/19/2019 12:21 PM, Henning Hraban Ramm wrote:
>
>> When I read "Java runs on millions of devices" I don’t feel that’s good
>> advertising, but it remembers me that each of those devices is at risk.
>
> The java updates keept telling that
On 10/19/2019 12:21 PM, Henning Hraban Ramm wrote:
When I read "Java runs on millions of devices" I don’t feel that’s good
advertising, but it remembers me that each of those devices is at risk.
The java updates keept telling that it runs on 3 billion devices but
that message doesn't change
> Am 2019-10-15 um 08:17 schrieb Marcin Borkowski :
>>> Basically javascript can be limited to (1) setting annotation properties,
>>> like toggling layers or button renditions, and (2) some simple calculations
>>> (for forms). Constructing pdf runtime using javascript is pretty braindead
>>>
Hello,
On 2019-10-13 12:43, Henning Hraban Ramm wrote:
Hi, I’d like to update my list of (usable!) PDF viewers.
Which one do you use? (Current version?)
PDF XChange Viewer
(https://www.tracker-software.com/product/pdf-xchange-viewer)
What are its pros and cons?
+ Free; not annoying as
>
> mupdf started simple but I think it also grew in a weird
> direction (large codebase, some reflow I think, a strange epub
> substandard support, etc .. all pretty useless to me and I'm not sure
> how optional it it ... so no longer as lightweight as it could be ...)
>
On 2019-10-14 18:55, Marcin Borkowski wrote:
Hi,
I don't use ConTeXt anymore, but I still get the emails from the list,
and I quickly skimmed throught this thread to see if someone writes
about my pdf-viewer of choice - pdf-tools
(https://github.com/politza/pdf-tools).
I too don't use
On Sun, Oct 13, 2019 at 12:43 PM Henning Hraban Ramm wrote:
> Hi, I’d like to update my list of (usable!) PDF viewers.
>
A recent android tablet 10" with HD display is quite ok with Adobe Reader
and several others apps ( eg foxit pdf reader)
EBookDroid is another app pdf +djvu reader , also
On Tue, Oct 15, 2019 at 10:21 AM Hans Hagen wrote:
> > Most of my PDF debugging is done using 'mutool clean’ (especially with
> the -d switch) and textmate / diff.
> qpdf also has something like that (with comments of where the objects
> come from)
it's the qdf export : pdf -> qdf -> (edit
On 10/15/2019 10:12 AM, Taco Hoekwater wrote:
On 15 Oct 2019, at 06:42, Henning Hraban Ramm wrote:
Thank you all for you valuable insights so far!
I’ll compile them to a wiki page and also complete the list in my upcoming book.
Am 2019-10-14 um 11:17 schrieb Hans Hagen :
When developing
On 2019-10-15, at 06:42, Henning Hraban Ramm wrote:
>> Basically javascript can be limited to (1) setting annotation properties,
>> like toggling layers or button renditions, and (2) some simple calculations
>> (for forms). Constructing pdf runtime using javascript is pretty braindead
>>
Hi,
I don't use ConTeXt anymore, but I still get the emails from the list,
and I quickly skimmed throught this thread to see if someone writes
about my pdf-viewer of choice - pdf-tools
(https://github.com/politza/pdf-tools).
On 2019-10-13, at 12:43, Henning Hraban Ramm wrote:
> Hi, I’d like to
> On 15 Oct 2019, at 06:42, Henning Hraban Ramm wrote:
>
> Thank you all for you valuable insights so far!
> I’ll compile them to a wiki page and also complete the list in my upcoming
> book.
>
>> Am 2019-10-14 um 11:17 schrieb Hans Hagen :
>>
>> When developing pdf specific code (like last
On 10/15/2019 6:42 AM, Henning Hraban Ramm wrote:
Do you know any other tools for PDF debugging? Those few I know of cost four to
five figures or were plugins to very old versions of Acrobat.
normally i trust my eyes and mind and 'standard' ... if it really get
hairy there are a few folks
> On 13 Oct 2019, at 12:43, Henning Hraban Ramm wrote:
>
> Hi, I’d like to update my list of (usable!) PDF viewers.
> Which one do you use? (Current version?)
Hi Hraban,
I am on MacOS and use the PDF viewer included in TeXShop (which is based on
Preview.app of MacOS). For my presentations I
Hi Henning, all,
On Sun, 13 Oct 2019 04:43:14 -0600, Henning Hraban Ramm
wrote:
> Hi, I’d like to update my list of (usable!) PDF viewers.
> Which one do you use? (Current version?)
> What are its pros and cons?
> Is it free (open source, freeware)?
> Does it work on Win/Lin/Mac?
> Does it
Thank you all for you valuable insights so far!
I’ll compile them to a wiki page and also complete the list in my upcoming book.
> Am 2019-10-14 um 11:17 schrieb Hans Hagen :
>
> When developing pdf specific code (like last months) I do use acrobat reader
> and an older acrobat x (which keeps
On Sun, 13 Oct 2019 12:43:14 +0200
Henning Hraban Ramm wrote:
> Hi, I’d like to update my list of (usable!) PDF viewers.
> Which one do you use? (Current version?)
On Mac OS, there is skim, which has better features than preview but uses the
same Apple rendering engine (with all of its bugs).
Henning Hraban Ramm writes:
pdf-tools in Emacs is well.
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl /
On 10/13/2019 12:43 PM, Henning Hraban Ramm wrote:
Hi, I’d like to update my list of (usable!) PDF viewers.
Which one do you use? (Current version?)
What are its pros and cons?
Is it free (open source, freeware)?
Does it work on Win/Lin/Mac?
Does it have a localized interface? (I don’t care, but
Hi,
> On 13 Oct 2019, at 12:43, Henning Hraban Ramm wrote:
>
> Hi, I’d like to update my list of (usable!) PDF viewers.
> Which one do you use? (Current version?)
Preview.App (Mac) — since it is fast and the MacOS default. But it does
not handle anything well except the actual page display.
: ntg-context Im Auftrag von Henning Hraban Ramm
Gesendet: Sonntag, 13. Oktober 2019 12:43
An: mailing list for ConTeXt users
Betreff: [NTG-context] PDF viewer poll
Hi, I’d like to update my list of (usable!) PDF viewers.
Which one do you use? (Current version?) What are its pros and cons
> On 13 Oct 2019, at 12:43, Henning Hraban Ramm wrote:
>
> Hi, I’d like to update my list of (usable!) PDF viewers.
> Which one do you use? (Current version?)
There is TeXShop that comes with the Mac TeX Live distribution. It can be set
up to compile ConTeXt.
> What are its pros and cons?
Hello,
I am using SumatraPDF at school (Windows). Lightweight, opens where it
was closed last time (very convenient when you've got presentations up
to 100 slides or more that takes several weeks to be discussed). Self
actualizes when the ConTeXt source is compiled.
At home (OpenBSD), mupdf and
- Okular v1.8.1 on my linux machines.
- SumatraPDF on windows at work (that never use for my ConTeXT related work)
Le dim. 13 oct. 2019 à 17:49, Pablo Rodriguez a écrit :
> On 10/13/19 12:43 PM, Henning Hraban Ramm wrote:
> > Hi, I’d like to update my list of (usable!) PDF viewers.
>
> 1.
On 10/13/19 12:43 PM, Henning Hraban Ramm wrote:
> Hi, I’d like to update my list of (usable!) PDF viewers.
1. Evince-3.28.5, MuPDF-1.16.1 and (sometimes) acroread-9.5.5 on Linux.
2. SumatraPDF, MuPDF and Acrobat Reader DC on Windows.
From MuPDF, I use mupdf-gl (just in case it might be
On 10/13/19 5:26 PM, Henning Hraban Ramm wrote:
> [...]
> xpdf I found a bit too basic for my taste. And it’s also based on
> poppler nowadays, like Qpdfview and several others.
Hi Hraban,
just for the record, poppler is a fork of xpdf-3 (from
https://poppler.freedesktop.org/).
Pablo
--
> Am 2019-10-13 um 16:50 schrieb Rudolf Bahr :
>
> Hello Hraban,
>
> I'm working with only 2 pdf-viewers, "okular" and "xpdf". My main-viewer is
> "okular", but
> at the moment it doesn't work with my context-pdfs, I don't know why, but I
> don't care.
> Then it's good to have "xpdf" which is
On Sun, Oct 13, 2019 at 12:43:14PM +0200, Henning Hraban Ramm wrote:
> Hi, I’d like to update my list of (usable!) PDF viewers.
> Which one do you use? (Current version?)
> What are its pros and cons?
> Is it free (open source, freeware)?
> Does it work on Win/Lin/Mac?
> Does it have a localized
Hi, I’d like to update my list of (usable!) PDF viewers.
Which one do you use? (Current version?)
What are its pros and cons?
Is it free (open source, freeware)?
Does it work on Win/Lin/Mac?
Does it have a localized interface? (I don’t care, but I work with people who
don’t understand a lot of
On Sat, 2011-06-18 at 06:18 +0200, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
When you use a environment file put all setups in it. When you have only
one product you dont need a project file because you can load the environment
file from the product and component files.
Wolfgang
Thanks Wolfgang. For some
luigi scarso luigi.scarso at gmail.com writes:
pdfbookmarks ?
http://wiki.contextgarden.net/PDF_Bookmarks_and_Headers
Hey Luigi. The sample code in the link you gave me works fine if I compile it.
If I put it in my own book, should the adjusted code be in the environment,
project, or product
Am 18.06.2011 um 03:43 schrieb Kip Warner:
luigi scarso luigi.scarso at gmail.com writes:
pdfbookmarks ?
http://wiki.contextgarden.net/PDF_Bookmarks_and_Headers
Hey Luigi. The sample code in the link you gave me works fine if I compile it.
If I put it in my own book, should the adjusted
Kip Warner wrote:
Hey folks,
I'm not sure where to be looking, as this may well be a feature already
implemented in ConTeXt or its lower level dependencies. I couldn't find
anything in the mailing archives, nor in the reference manual or wiki.
In my PDF viewer Evince, I have a navigation
Hey folks,
I'm not sure where to be looking, as this may well be a feature already
implemented in ConTeXt or its lower level dependencies. I couldn't find
anything in the mailing archives, nor in the reference manual or wiki.
In my PDF viewer Evince, I have a navigation tree in the side bar that
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 1:51 AM, Kip Warner k...@thevertigo.com wrote:
Hey folks,
I'm not sure where to be looking, as this may well be a feature already
implemented in ConTeXt or its lower level dependencies. I couldn't find
anything in the mailing archives, nor in the reference manual or
51 matches
Mail list logo
