ConTeXt is not causing me any problems. I just wanted to thank the
developers for creating such a useful tool, and for providing such
excellent support.
I have just received copies of my 730 page hard cover book that chronicles
part of my immediate family's life together, created by
Hi, Hans
On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 11:21 AM, Yanrui Li [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 12:17:15PM +0200, Hans Hagen wrote:
Longmin Wang wrote:
Hi, Hans, Thank you for the great works. But there is still a problem when
I test a more complicated file which is attached below. In
Yue Wang wrote:
Hi, Hans
On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 11:21 AM, Yanrui Li [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 12:17:15PM +0200, Hans Hagen wrote:
Longmin Wang wrote:
Hi, Hans, Thank you for the great works. But there is still a problem when
I test a more complicated file which is
Hi, Hans:
more detail needed, what problem, what test file
OK, I forwarded the source code from Longming Wang to you in a private
mail. It was once solved, but later appeared again (maybe during the
10/1 update).
Yue Wang
On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 9:14 PM, Yue Wang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, Hans:
more detail needed, what problem, what test file
OK, I forwarded the source code from Longming Wang to you in a private
mail. It was once solved, but later appeared again (maybe during the
10/1 update).
Yue
2008/10/24 Yue Wang [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Oh, btw, Yanrui Li also has a problem concerning the space between
chinese and english (different space skips when use different chinese
fonts). He is also in the list so I think it is better to leave to him
to describe the problem.
I have ever report
I think this is a problem concerning the improper variables in the font:(
The em space should not get from the chinese fonts, but directly from
the font size the user invoked (for example, for 30pt font 1em=30pt ).
On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 9:43 PM, Yanrui Li [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2008/10/24
On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 12:17:15PM +0200, Hans Hagen wrote:
Longmin Wang wrote:
Hi, Hans, Thank you for the great works. But there is still a problem when
I test a more complicated file which is attached below. In this file,
both \bf and \bi give the same font lmroman10-bold.
experimental
Longmin Wang wrote:
Hi, Hans, Thank you for the great works. But there is still a problem when
I test a more complicated file which is attached below. In this file,
both \bf and \bi give the same font lmroman10-bold.
I guess the reason is that I use the same Chinese font
Longmin Wang wrote:
Hi, Hans, Thank you for the great works. But there is still a problem when
I test a more complicated file which is attached below. In this file,
both \bf and \bi give the same font lmroman10-bold.
experimental patch in beta
On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 12:17:15PM +0200, Hans Hagen wrote:
Longmin Wang wrote:
Hi, Hans, Thank you for the great works. But there is still a problem when
I test a more complicated file which is attached below. In this file,
both \bf and \bi give the same font lmroman10-bold.
experimental
On Fri, Aug 08, 2008 at 11:55:21AM +0200, Hans Hagen wrote:
there was a bug as well as the fact that your definition is wrong
% engine=luatex
\ctxlua{fonts.collections.trace = true}
\definefontfeature[zh][mode=node,script=hang,lang=zhs]
\starttypescript [serif] [zhfont]
\definefontsynonym
Yue Wang wrote:
Hi, Hans:
Today I am trying to compile my new book chapter on aerosol science
using MKIV. It works great! Thank you.
Most commands are successful (rm, ss, mono) after I define a
typescript for the Chinese font.
commands like \bfa also works.
However, basic TeX commands
13 matches
Mail list logo
