Hi, Hans
On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 11:21 AM, Yanrui Li [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 12:17:15PM +0200, Hans Hagen wrote:
Longmin Wang wrote:
Hi, Hans, Thank you for the great works. But there is still a problem when
I test a more complicated file which is attached below. In
Yue Wang wrote:
Hi, Hans
On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 11:21 AM, Yanrui Li [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 12:17:15PM +0200, Hans Hagen wrote:
Longmin Wang wrote:
Hi, Hans, Thank you for the great works. But there is still a problem when
I test a more complicated file which is
Hi, Hans:
more detail needed, what problem, what test file
OK, I forwarded the source code from Longming Wang to you in a private
mail. It was once solved, but later appeared again (maybe during the
10/1 update).
Yue Wang
On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 9:14 PM, Yue Wang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, Hans:
more detail needed, what problem, what test file
OK, I forwarded the source code from Longming Wang to you in a private
mail. It was once solved, but later appeared again (maybe during the
10/1 update).
Yue
2008/10/24 Yue Wang [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Oh, btw, Yanrui Li also has a problem concerning the space between
chinese and english (different space skips when use different chinese
fonts). He is also in the list so I think it is better to leave to him
to describe the problem.
I have ever report
I think this is a problem concerning the improper variables in the font:(
The em space should not get from the chinese fonts, but directly from
the font size the user invoked (for example, for 30pt font 1em=30pt ).
On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 9:43 PM, Yanrui Li [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2008/10/24
On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 12:17:15PM +0200, Hans Hagen wrote:
Longmin Wang wrote:
Hi, Hans, Thank you for the great works. But there is still a problem when
I test a more complicated file which is attached below. In this file,
both \bf and \bi give the same font lmroman10-bold.
experimental
Longmin Wang wrote:
Hi, Hans, Thank you for the great works. But there is still a problem when
I test a more complicated file which is attached below. In this file,
both \bf and \bi give the same font lmroman10-bold.
I guess the reason is that I use the same Chinese font
Longmin Wang wrote:
Hi, Hans, Thank you for the great works. But there is still a problem when
I test a more complicated file which is attached below. In this file,
both \bf and \bi give the same font lmroman10-bold.
experimental patch in beta
On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 12:17:15PM +0200, Hans Hagen wrote:
Longmin Wang wrote:
Hi, Hans, Thank you for the great works. But there is still a problem when
I test a more complicated file which is attached below. In this file,
both \bf and \bi give the same font lmroman10-bold.
experimental
On Fri, Aug 08, 2008 at 11:55:21AM +0200, Hans Hagen wrote:
there was a bug as well as the fact that your definition is wrong
% engine=luatex
\ctxlua{fonts.collections.trace = true}
\definefontfeature[zh][mode=node,script=hang,lang=zhs]
\starttypescript [serif] [zhfont]
\definefontsynonym
Yue Wang wrote:
Hi, Hans:
Today I am trying to compile my new book chapter on aerosol science
using MKIV. It works great! Thank you.
Most commands are successful (rm, ss, mono) after I define a
typescript for the Chinese font.
commands like \bfa also works.
However, basic TeX commands
12 matches
Mail list logo