Hans,
If my only constraints were ease of programming and moderate
performance, I would completely agree that using mostly Lua plus
(possibly) some C code for some targeted stuff that is really slow in
Lua is the correct solution we are actually in agreement.
Unfortunately, I have the
On 12/2/2020 11:43 AM, Stephen Gaito wrote:
Again, to my knowledge, Lua v5.4 has only one implementation (though
this implementation *can* be compiled for a very wide range of CPU's).
Lua has not many demands ... it can even run on tiny cpu's. It's all
rather plain C code. (And in luametatex
Hans,
Many thanks for your comments... see below.
On Mon, 30 Nov 2020 19:31:55 +0100
Hans Hagen wrote:
> On 11/30/2020 10:51 AM, Stephen Gaito wrote:
> > Hello (again),
> >
> > This email is further to my previous "Using ConTeXt-LMTX for modern
> > Mathematically-Literate-Programming 1/2"
Hello (again),
This email is further to my previous "Using ConTeXt-LMTX for modern
Mathematically-Literate-Programming 1/2" email...
My ultimate goal in using ConTeXt-LMTX as a
Mathematically-Literate-Programming tool, is to actually write a
kernel "Mathematical Language" in ANSI-C (wrapped in
