[NTG-context] Why can not rm or rmtf fonts be set up by \definebodyfont macro?

2009-04-05 Thread Yanrui Li
These days I have been reading co-fonts.pdf because I plan to write a document about ConTeXt MkIV for our Chinese users. When I reached the part of Defining body fonts, for testing bodyfont model, I made an example as following: \definefontsynonym[Song][AdobeSongStd-Light]

Re: [NTG-context] Why can not rm or rmtf fonts be set up by \definebodyfont macro?

2009-04-05 Thread Wolfgang Schuster
Am 05.04.2009 um 15:07 schrieb Yanrui Li: I want to know why I can not override the preloading rm font. Dunno but it works for a complete definition. \definefontsynonym [Song] [file:AdobeSongStd-Light] \definefontsynonym [Hei] [file:AdobeHeitiStd-Regular] \definefontsynonym

Re: [NTG-context] Why can not rm or rmtf fonts be set up by \definebodyfont macro?

2009-04-05 Thread Yanrui Li
2009/4/5 Wolfgang Schuster schuster.wolfg...@googlemail.com: Am 05.04.2009 um 15:07 schrieb Yanrui Li: I want to know why I can not override the preloading rm font. Dunno but it works for a complete definition. If I use other font size, it can work, such as: \definebodyfont[11pt][rm]

Re: [NTG-context] Why can not rm or rmtf fonts be set up by \definebodyfont macro?

2009-04-05 Thread Wolfgang Schuster
Am 05.04.2009 um 17:16 schrieb Yanrui Li: I want to know why I can not override the preloading rm font. Dunno but it works for a complete definition. If I use other font size, it can work, such as: It has to do with the default setting which is 12pt roman.

Re: [NTG-context] Why can not rm or rmtf fonts be set up by \definebodyfont macro?

2009-04-05 Thread Hans Hagen
Wolfgang Schuster wrote: Am 05.04.2009 um 17:16 schrieb Yanrui Li: I want to know why I can not override the preloading rm font. Dunno but it works for a complete definition. If I use other font size, it can work, such as: It has to do with the default setting which is 12pt roman.

Re: [NTG-context] Why can not rm or rmtf fonts be set up by \definebodyfont macro?

2009-04-05 Thread Wolfgang Schuster
Am 05.04.2009 um 22:04 schrieb Hans Hagen: Wolfgang Schuster wrote: Am 05.04.2009 um 17:16 schrieb Yanrui Li: I want to know why I can not override the preloading rm font. Dunno but it works for a complete definition. If I use other font size, it can work, such as: It has to do with the

Re: [NTG-context] Why can not rm or rmtf fonts be set up by \definebodyfont macro?

2009-04-05 Thread Hans Hagen
Wolfgang Schuster wrote: Am 05.04.2009 um 22:04 schrieb Hans Hagen: Wolfgang Schuster wrote: Am 05.04.2009 um 17:16 schrieb Yanrui Li: I want to know why I can not override the preloading rm font. Dunno but it works for a complete definition. If I use other font size, it can work, such

Re: [NTG-context] Why can not rm or rmtf fonts be set up by \definebodyfont macro?

2009-04-05 Thread Wolfgang Schuster
Am 05.04.2009 um 23:14 schrieb Hans Hagen: \setupbodyfont[reset] \setupbodyfont[mymodern] Did not work because reset alone use the roman style also for italic and bold and he don't use his own typeface, your dummy mymodern lead us back to the start. tricky ... --mode=*nofonts Not

Re: [NTG-context] Why can not rm or rmtf fonts be set up by \definebodyfont macro?

2009-04-05 Thread Hans Hagen
Wolfgang Schuster wrote: Am 05.04.2009 um 23:14 schrieb Hans Hagen: \setupbodyfont[reset] \setupbodyfont[mymodern] Did not work because reset alone use the roman style also for italic and bold and he don't use his own typeface, your dummy mymodern lead us back to the start. tricky ...

Re: [NTG-context] Why can not rm or rmtf fonts be set up by \definebodyfont macro?

2009-04-05 Thread Wolfgang Schuster
Am 05.04.2009 um 23:25 schrieb Hans Hagen: sure, but i'm not too eager to add that kind of hackery so loading a new typeface then makes more sense My hack can be done in a cleaner way with \appendtoks\letcsnamecs \csname\newfontidentifier\endcsname\undefined\to\everystarttext but a new

Re: [NTG-context] Why can not rm or rmtf fonts be set up by \definebodyfont macro?

2009-04-05 Thread Yanrui Li
2009/4/6 Wolfgang Schuster schuster.wolfg...@googlemail.com: Am 05.04.2009 um 23:25 schrieb Hans Hagen: sure, but i'm not too eager to add that kind of hackery so loading a new typeface then makes more sense My hack can be done in a cleaner way with