On Jul 4, 2012, at 10:56 PM, luigi scarso wrote:
On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 12:44 AM, Rogers, Michael K
mrog...@emory.edumailto:mrog...@emory.edu wrote:
XML seems a nice way for machines to deal with data. But it's not a very human
way to speak. I mean, if I write \section{One}...\section{Two}
On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 12:44 AM, Rogers, Michael K mrog...@emory.eduwrote:
On Jul 4, 2012, at 1:29 PM, Peter Münster wrote:
On Wed, Jul 04 2012, Hans Hagen wrote:
no, mixing this way is asking for troubles, if not now, than maybe in
the
future
just use \section
Yes, but isn't
On Jul 5, 2012, at 1:23 AM, luigi scarso wrote:
On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 12:44 AM, Rogers, Michael K
mrog...@emory.edumailto:mrog...@emory.edu wrote:
XML documents should form a tree, so a structure like
\startA % A
\startB % B
\stopA % /A
\stopB % /B
won't translate to XML.
Grouping in TeX
On 4-7-2012 00:51, Peter Münster wrote:
Hi,
Say I want Tufte in 2 columns and Knuth in 1 column:
--8---cut here---start-8---
\starttext
\startcolumns[n=2]
\startsection[title=Tufte]
\input tufte
\stopsection
\startsection[title=Tufte and Knuth]
On Wed, Jul 04 2012, Hans Hagen wrote:
no, mixing this way is asking for troubles, if not now, than maybe in the
future
just use \section
Yes, but isn't \startsection the recommended method for the future and
needed for XML output?
--
Peter
On 4-7-2012 22:29, Peter Münster wrote:
On Wed, Jul 04 2012, Hans Hagen wrote:
no, mixing this way is asking for troubles, if not now, than maybe in the
future
just use \section
Yes, but isn't \startsection the recommended method for the future and
needed for XML output?
Indeed, but there
On Jul 4, 2012, at 1:29 PM, Peter Münster wrote:
On Wed, Jul 04 2012, Hans Hagen wrote:
no, mixing this way is asking for troubles, if not now, than maybe in the
future
just use \section
Yes, but isn't \startsection the recommended method for the future and
needed for XML output?
XML
On Thu, Jul 05 2012, Rogers, Michael K wrote:
Have you considered structuring your example like this?:
The output is not the same...
--
Peter
___
If your question is of interest to others as well,
On Jul 4, 2012, at 9:42 PM, Peter Münster wrote:
On Thu, Jul 05 2012, Rogers, Michael K wrote:
Have you considered structuring your example like this?:
The output is not the same...
Sorry, I misunderstood.
This e-mail message (including any attachments)
On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 12:44 AM, Rogers, Michael K mrog...@emory.eduwrote:
XML seems a nice way for machines to deal with data. But it's not a very
human way to speak. I mean, if I write \section{One}...\section{Two}
isn't it obvious that section One ends when section Two begins? Why
Hi,
Say I want Tufte in 2 columns and Knuth in 1 column:
--8---cut here---start-8---
\starttext
\startcolumns[n=2]
\startsection[title=Tufte]
\input tufte
\stopsection
\startsection[title=Tufte and Knuth]
\input tufte
\stopcolumns
\input
11 matches
Mail list logo
