Am 15.05.2009 um 01:48 schrieb luigi scarso:
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 12:39 PM, Wolfgang Schuster
schuster.wolfg...@googlemail.com wrote:
when i convert the to TT format i get a correct output
yes, but there is also an original ttf version -- they works ok , of
course.
you wrote this
On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 6:27 PM, Wolfgang Schuster
schuster.wolfg...@googlemail.com wrote:
Am 13.05.2009 um 17:51 schrieb luigi scarso:
I have not look at simplefonts as I want -- I planned
to use it for an article on felltypes for arstexnica
You fixed the problem with the felltype
luigi scarso wrote:
$pdffonts felltype.pdf
name type emb sub uni object ID
- --- --- --- -
PDPWHW+LMRoman12-Regular CID Type 0C yes yes yes 4 0
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 11:11 AM, Taco Hoekwater t...@elvenkind.com wrote:
luigi scarso wrote:
$pdffonts felltype.pdf
name type emb sub uni object
ID
- --- --- ---
-
luigi scarso wrote:
So I don't understand how OO transform this opentype in a Type1 ,
I guess that that is not hard when a document uses no more than 256
glyphs from the font.
yes, a sort of creation of font encodings at fly for more than 256
glyphs -- but why ?
Maybe
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 11:34 AM, Taco Hoekwater t...@elvenkind.com wrote:
luigi scarso wrote:
So I don't understand how OO transform this opentype in a Type1 ,
I guess that that is not hard when a document uses no more than 256
glyphs from the font.
yes, a sort of
luigi scarso wrote:
And aren't we able to do the same trick -- even with a lots of
unreadable macros -- in luatex ?
No, it needs engine support which is not present. Fastest solution:
open the font in fontforge and fix the units, save under a different
name, and use that font instead.
Best
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 11:56 AM, Taco Hoekwater t...@elvenkind.com wrote:
luigi scarso wrote:
And aren't we able to do the same trick -- even with a lots of
unreadable macros -- in luatex ?
No, it needs engine support which is not present. Fastest solution:
open the font in fontforge
Am 14.05.2009 um 12:12 schrieb luigi scarso:
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 11:56 AM, Taco Hoekwater
t...@elvenkind.com wrote:
No, it needs engine support which is not present. Fastest solution:
open the font in fontforge and fix the units, save under a different
name, and use that font instead.
arthur told me that can arise rounding errors.
You have to remember I used to be a mathematician. I say things that
are meant to be true, not meant to be helpful :-)
If you want to be sure that LuaTeX's output looks right in the most
recent versions of Adobe Reader, editing the font is the
when i convert the to TT format i get a correct output
If Luigi is concerned with rounding errors, he shouldn't do that:
while the coordinates of the points on the curve wouldn't change, all
the control points would need to be recalculated due to the conversion
from cubic to quadratic splines.
Arthur Reutenauer wrote:
when i convert the to TT format i get a correct output
If Luigi is concerned with rounding errors, he shouldn't do that:
while the coordinates of the points on the curve wouldn't change, all
the control points would need to be recalculated due to the conversion
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 11:03:10AM +0200, luigi scarso wrote:
$pdffonts felltype.pdf
name
type emb sub uni object ID
- --- --- --- -
PDPWHW+LMRoman12-Regular CID Type 0C
Rounding errors are not that important in this case, and there
are downsides to both (o3-o2 touches *only* control points, so in
some sense it is more precise than upm change).
True, you can see it that way, too. We really need Karel Píška here :-)
Not only OOo, InDesign does that too, moreover, someone said even if
LuaTeX (XeTeX too) output looked OK in Adobe reader 7, the print isn't
OK.
On what printer? It's probably a bug in the driver, too. LuaTeX does
exactly according to specification, I discussed this strategy with Taco
years
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 1:08 PM, Arthur Reutenauer
arthur.reutena...@normalesup.org wrote:
arthur told me that can arise rounding errors.
You have to remember I used to be a mathematician. I say things that
are meant to be true, not meant to be helpful :-)
If you want to be sure that
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 12:39 PM, Wolfgang Schuster
schuster.wolfg...@googlemail.com wrote:
Am 14.05.2009 um 12:12 schrieb luigi scarso:
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 11:56 AM, Taco Hoekwater t...@elvenkind.com
wrote:
No, it needs engine support which is not present. Fastest solution:
open
As a reference,
I start from
http://meeting.contextgarden.net/2008/talks/2008-08-24-taco-typescripts/liberation.tex
Also
http://context.aanhet.net/svn/contextman/context-reference/en/co-fonts.pdf
and
http://context.aanhet.net/svn/contextman/context-reference/en/co-typography.pdf
and look into
afsmith wrote:
Hi ntg-context.
I'm very confused about accomplishing something that to me seems as
though it should be quite simple, but has proven for weeks of
occasional attempts to be very confusing. I'm finding existing
information from the contextgarden wiki and ntg-context archives to be
Am 13.05.2009 um 15:29 schrieb luigi scarso:
As a reference,
I start from
http://meeting.contextgarden.net/2008/talks/2008-08-24-taco-typescripts/liberation.tex
Also
http://context.aanhet.net/svn/contextman/context-reference/en/co-fonts.pdf
and
On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 4:36 PM, Wolfgang Schuster
schuster.wolfg...@googlemail.com wrote:
Am 13.05.2009 um 15:29 schrieb luigi scarso:
As a reference,
I start from
http://meeting.contextgarden.net/2008/talks/2008-08-24-taco-typescripts/liberation.tex
Also
Am 13.05.2009 um 16:48 schrieb luigi scarso:
There is also a simpler way: http://bitbucket.org/wolfs/
simplefonts/ :)
still no arrived there.
I'm sorry but what do you mean?
Wolfgang
___
If your question
On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 5:36 PM, Wolfgang Schuster
schuster.wolfg...@googlemail.com wrote:
Am 13.05.2009 um 16:48 schrieb luigi scarso:
There is also a simpler way: http://bitbucket.org/wolfs/simplefonts/ :)
still no arrived there.
I'm sorry but what do you mean?
ah ,bad english
Am 13.05.2009 um 17:51 schrieb luigi scarso:
I have not look at simplefonts as I want -- I planned
to use it for an article on felltypes for arstexnica
You fixed the problem with the felltype fonts?
Wolfgang
Luigi, Hans, and Wolfgang, thank you for your responses. I'm still
unclear on several things. (comments on your responses follow
afterwards)
Let me try asking these things as questions. Specifically, could
someone please tell me...
1. How do I determine whether I am using MKII, MKIV, or XeTeX to
afsmith wrote:
Luigi, Hans, and Wolfgang, thank you for your responses. I'm still
unclear on several things. (comments on your responses follow
afterwards)
Let me try asking these things as questions. Specifically, could
someone please tell me...
1. How do I determine whether I am using MKII,
Am 13.05.2009 um 18:31 schrieb afsmith:
Wolfgang,
Currently the module you linked to
(http://bitbucket.org/wolfs/simplefonts/) is beyond my
understanding... I would first like to understand the mechanism your
module operates on before trying to automate it.
My module simplifies the use of
On Wed, 13 May 2009, afsmith wrote:
Luigi, Hans, and Wolfgang, thank you for your responses. I'm still
unclear on several things. (comments on your responses follow
afterwards)
Let me try asking these things as questions. Specifically, could
someone please tell me...
1. How do I determine
Am 13.05.2009 um 22:23 schrieb Aditya Mahajan:
On Wed, 13 May 2009, afsmith wrote:
Let me try asking these things as questions. Specifically, could
someone please tell me...
1. How do I determine whether I am using MKII, MKIV, or XeTeX to
process my documents?
Depends on how you process
if you don't require anything completex
http://github.com/contextgarden/otfinstall/tree/master automates a lot
of the tasks required in installing a font in mkii.
afsmith wrote:
Luigi, Hans, and Wolfgang, thank you for your responses. I'm still
unclear on several things. (comments on your
30 matches
Mail list logo
