Re: [NTG-context] lm otf math

2011-05-13 Thread Vedran Miletić
2011/5/12 Hans Hagen pra...@wxs.nl Hi, The minimals now carry a beta version of lmmath.otf. Even when all lm and gyre math fonts are released, the vf variants will stay available if only because we need them to test luatex's virtual font machinery. As there is only one design size (but

Re: [NTG-context] lm otf math

2011-05-13 Thread Hans Hagen
On 13-5-2011 9:52, Vedran Miletić wrote: 2011/5/12 Hans Hagenpra...@wxs.nl Hi, The minimals now carry a beta version of lmmath.otf. Even when all lm and gyre math fonts are released, the vf variants will stay available if only because we need them to test luatex's virtual font machinery. As

Re: [NTG-context] lm otf math

2011-05-13 Thread Hans Hagen
On 12-5-2011 8:18, George N. White III wrote: On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 11:43 AM, Hans Hagenpra...@wxs.nl wrote: On 12-5-2011 3:42, Aditya Mahajan wrote: On Thu, 12 May 2011, Martin Schröder wrote: 2011/5/12 Hans Hagenpra...@wxs.nl: \starttext $e=mc^2$ Shouldn't that be something

Re: [NTG-context] lm otf math

2011-05-13 Thread Martin Schröder
2011/5/13 Hans Hagen pra...@wxs.nl: The next beta will deal with Schröder math input encoding: :-))) ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist :

Re: [NTG-context] lm otf math

2011-05-13 Thread Vedran Miletić
Dana 13. svibnja 2011. 10:04 Hans Hagen pra...@wxs.nl je napisao/la: On 13-5-2011 9:52, Vedran Miletić wrote: Just curious: why is it embedded as being named Latin? because latin modern is the follow up in computer modern; the name comes from the fact hat it started as a merge of all

Re: [NTG-context] lm otf math

2011-05-13 Thread Hans Hagen
On 13-5-2011 7:24, Vedran Miletić wrote: name type emb sub uni object ID - --- --- --- - JFRMQG+LMRoman10-Regular CID Type 0C yes yes yes 18 0 JYDOFF+Latin CID Type 0C yes yes yes 19 0 Shouldn't it be LMMath or something like that?

Re: [NTG-context] lm otf math

2011-05-12 Thread Martin Schröder
2011/5/12 Hans Hagen pra...@wxs.nl: \starttext    $e=mc^2$ Shouldn't that be something like e=mc²? Best Martin ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist :

Re: [NTG-context] lm otf math

2011-05-12 Thread Aditya Mahajan
On Thu, 12 May 2011, Martin Schröder wrote: 2011/5/12 Hans Hagen pra...@wxs.nl: \starttext    $e=mc^2$ Shouldn't that be something like e=mc²? No. IIRC, we had a discussion sometime ago whether we should treat ¹,², etc as valid superscripts in math mode, and decided against it.

Re: [NTG-context] lm otf math

2011-05-12 Thread Hans Hagen
On 12-5-2011 3:37, Martin Schröder wrote: 2011/5/12 Hans Hagenpra...@wxs.nl: \starttext $e=mc^2$ Shouldn't that be something like e=mc²? Maybe at some point I will provide that as an option, but ² is one of those weird unicode things ... what woudl you do in this case: a = bc^{2d}

Re: [NTG-context] lm otf math

2011-05-12 Thread Hans Hagen
On 12-5-2011 3:42, Aditya Mahajan wrote: On Thu, 12 May 2011, Martin Schröder wrote: 2011/5/12 Hans Hagen pra...@wxs.nl: \starttext $e=mc^2$ Shouldn't that be something like e=mc²? No. IIRC, we had a discussion sometime ago whether we should treat ¹,², etc as valid superscripts in math

Re: [NTG-context] lm otf math

2011-05-12 Thread George N. White III
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 11:43 AM, Hans Hagen pra...@wxs.nl wrote: On 12-5-2011 3:42, Aditya Mahajan wrote: On Thu, 12 May 2011, Martin Schröder wrote: 2011/5/12 Hans Hagen pra...@wxs.nl: \starttext   $e=mc^2$ Shouldn't that be something like e=mc²? No. IIRC, we had a discussion