/ help
Command/ high
Command/ highlight
Command/ label
Command/ labellanguage
Command/ labeltext
Command/ labeltexts
Command/ language
Command/ leftlabeltext
Command/ linenote
Command/ low
Command/ lowhigh
Command/ lowmidhigh
Command/ margindata
Command/ mathcommand
Command/ mathdoubleextensible
Com
) figures in the table when you don’t want
oldstyle figures.
Another question about fonts. Is there a way to define a conditional
mathcommand based on the current alternative style? For instance, in the
following example I would like to keep the bold effect but with adaptation to
the local
why use math here?
It was to avoid oldstyle figures that I use by default. But finally it's
better to use oldstyle figures even in tables.
Another question about fonts. Is there a way to define a conditional
mathcommand based on the current alternative style? For instance, in the
following
figures.
Another question about fonts. Is there a way to define a conditional
mathcommand based on the current alternative style? For instance, in the
following example I would like to keep the bold effect but with adaptation to
the local alternative style (in text mode, when the local
] % Taken from \setupcolor [x11]
\starttext
$\mathcommand{tan} θ$
\let\tan\relax
\color[tan]{Alan}
\stoptext
-
Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt
Hi,
did something change in consideration of mathcommand/mfunction? I get italic
operators instead of the usual (I suppose) upright typesetting.
Thanks!
Cheers
Andreas
minimal example
\definemathcommand[diag][nolop]{\mfunction{diag}}
\starttext
$\diag(1,\ldots,1)$ % diag is italic
On 1/24/2013 2:33 PM, Andreas Mang wrote:
Hi,
did something change in consideration of mathcommand/mfunction? I get italic
operators instead of the usual (I suppose) upright typesetting.
When working on a a chapter in an upcoming font manual I found out that
\mr (regular) was not consistent
