[NTG-context] barring changes

\underrandom doesn’t work \underrandoms doesn’t work \overbar works, but not in TABLE \overbars works \overstrike works, but not in TABLE \overstrikes works \understrike works, but not in TABLE \understrikes works The nested example \overbar{Über} \underbar{Unterstrich \underbar{steigt

Re: [NTG-context] double underbars

; On 30 Nov 2021, at 12:06, Denis Maier via ntg-context >> cont...@ntg.nl> wrote: > >>> > >>> Hi, > >>> > >>> for a current project I’ll need different variants of underbars. > >>> > >>> - A normal underbar > &

Re: [NTG-context] double underbars

ar >>> - A combination of both >>> >>> Is there a way to combine them? I was hoping to have the dotted variant >> above the normal bar. >> >> I would like to have this type of “complete” bar nesting as well. >> >> As it stands, you can nes

Re: [NTG-context] double underbars

Am 30.11.21 um 14:19 schrieb Taco Hoekwater via ntg-context: I would like to have this type of “complete” bar nesting as well. YES, #metoo As it stands, you can nest \underbars inside \underbars and \overstrikes inside \overstrikes and \overbars inside \overbars, but no other combinations

Re: [NTG-context] double underbars

have this type of “complete” bar nesting as well. > > As it stands, you can nest \underbars inside \underbars and \overstrikes > inside \overstrikes and \overbars inside \overbars, but no other > combinations work. Interoperability between these (as well as \underdot, > \underdash, \un

Re: [NTG-context] double underbars

hem? I was hoping to have the dotted variant above > the normal bar. I would like to have this type of “complete” bar nesting as well. As it stands, you can nest \underbars inside \underbars and \overstrikes inside \overstrikes and \overbars inside \overbars, but no other combinations work. Int

Re: [NTG-context] Behaviour of \overbar in math mode

hen it comes to \overbar command in math mode. > > > MWE: > > > > > > \starttext > > > > > >     \overbar{1} > > > > > >     $\overbar{1}$ > > > > > > \stoptext > > > > > > In math mode the ex

Re: [NTG-context] Behaviour of \overbar in math mode

Did I miss a change; is there a new method for overbars in math mode? Greetings, Sebastian ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl /

Re: [NTG-context] Behaviour of \overbar in math mode

math mode. MWE: \starttext    \overbar{1}    $\overbar{1}$ \stoptext In math mode the example looks broken... Did I miss a change; is there a new method for overbars in math mode? Greetings, Seba

Re: [NTG-context] Behaviour of \overbar in math mode

r command in math mode.  > MWE: > > \starttext > >    \overbar{1} >     >    $\overbar{1}$ >     > \stoptext > > In math mode the example looks broken... Did I miss a change; is there a  > new method for

[NTG-context] Behaviour of \overbar in math mode

new method for overbars in math mode? Greetings, Sebastian ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo

[NTG-context] underbar/overbar to long with one character in mkiv

is also under/over that space. Is this intended? Example: \starttext \underbar{b} \overbar{b} \underbar{b} $\underbar{b} = \overbar{b} = \underbar{b}$ \stoptext A fix for this would be to use \underbars{b} or \overbars{b} instead, btw. Best wishes, Stefan

Re: [NTG-context] ConTeXt-ifying Kile

text} \nomarking{text} \nomoreblocks \nomorefiles \nop \nospace \note[reference] \notopandbottomlines \nowhitespace # \NR \numbers{text} \overbar{text} \overbars{text text} # \overlaybutton # \overlayfigure \overstrike{text} \overstrikes{text text} \packed \page[options] \pagereference[reference]