[NTG-context] Re: overbraces in concrete mathematics - bug?

2024-11-03 Thread Julius Ross
2024 at 11:00 PM wrote: >> > >> > Hi, >> > >> > With the below, the overbraces appear too high (the underbraces are in >> the right position) >> > >> > \starttext >> > \switchtobodyfont[concrete] >> > \startformula >>

[NTG-context] Re: overbraces in concrete mathematics - bug?

2024-11-02 Thread Julius Ross
ou get, so I don't know what you expect.) > > /Mikael > > On Sat, Nov 2, 2024 at 11:00 PM wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > With the below, the overbraces appear too high (the underbraces are in > the right position) > > > > \starttext

[NTG-context] Re: overbraces in concrete mathematics - bug?

2024-11-02 Thread Mikael Sundqvist
> right position) > > \starttext > \switchtobodyfont[concrete] > \startformula > \overbrace{a+a} > \underbrace{a+a} > \stopformula > \stoptext > > Would appreciate if somebody can tell me if they see the same, or if this is > a bug. The version of ConTeXt I use is

[NTG-context] overbraces in concrete mathematics - bug?

2024-11-02 Thread juliusross
Hi, With the below, the overbraces appear too high (the underbraces are in the right position) \starttext \switchtobodyfont[concrete] \startformula \overbrace{a+a} \underbrace{a+a} \stopformula \stoptext Would appreciate if somebody can tell me if they see the same, or if this is a bug. The

[NTG-context] Re: increase vertical between underbrace and equation

2023-12-19 Thread Mikael Sundqvist
xt here}} > \stopformula > > I've tried using \blank and \vspace, but to no avail. For example: > > \underbrace{x+y+z}_{\blank[1cm]\mathrm{my text here}} > ...does not work. > > The documentation on underbrace (and overbrace, underbracket, etc...) in the > ContextGar

[NTG-context] Re: increase vertical between underbrace and equation

2023-12-18 Thread Dean Hung
gt; >> > >>> The documentation on underbrace (and overbrace, underbracket, etc...) > in > >>> the ContextGarden wiki seems to be very limited, and I was not able to > find > >>> any user-supplied arguments for increasing this vertical distance. > &g

[NTG-context] Re: increase vertical between underbrace and equation

2023-12-18 Thread Dean Hung
blank[1cm]\mathrm{my text here}} > > ...does not work. > > > > The documentation on underbrace (and overbrace, underbracket, etc...) in > > the ContextGarden wiki seems to be very limited, and I was not able to > find > > any user-supplied arguments for increasing this

[NTG-context] Re: increase vertical between underbrace and equation

2023-12-18 Thread Wolfgang Schuster
Aditya Mahajan schrieb am 18.12.2023 um 21:55: On Mon, 18 Dec 2023, Aditya Mahajan wrote: On Mon, 18 Dec 2023, Dean Hung wrote: The documentation on underbrace (and overbrace, underbracket, etc...) in the ContextGarden wiki seems to be very limited, and I was not able to find any user

[NTG-context] Re: increase vertical between underbrace and equation

2023-12-18 Thread Aditya Mahajan
On Mon, 18 Dec 2023, Aditya Mahajan wrote: > On Mon, 18 Dec 2023, Dean Hung wrote: > > > The documentation on underbrace (and overbrace, underbracket, etc...) in > > the ContextGarden wiki seems to be very limited, and I was not able to find > > any user-supplied argum

[NTG-context] Re: increase vertical between underbrace and equation

2023-12-18 Thread Aditya Mahajan
pformula > > I've tried using \blank and \vspace, but to no avail. For example: > > \underbrace{x+y+z}_{\blank[1cm]\mathrm{my text here}} > ...does not work. > > The documentation on underbrace (and overbrace, underbracket, etc...) in > the ContextGarden wiki seems to b

[NTG-context] increase vertical between underbrace and equation

2023-12-18 Thread Dean Hung
ample: \underbrace{x+y+z}_{\blank[1cm]\mathrm{my text here}} ...does not work. The documentation on underbrace (and overbrace, underbracket, etc...) in the ContextGarden wiki seems to be very limited, and I was not able to find any user-supplied arguments for increasing this vertical distance. Ther

Re: [NTG-context] update

2023-02-24 Thread Otared Kavian via ntg-context
Hi Hans, Thank you very much for the new update. Everything seem to work like a charm. In particular I played with the \underbrace and \overbrace when adding something under the \underbrace, or above the \overbrace, like in \startformula \overbrace{1+x^2+a}^{= -1} + \underbrace{ax^2 + bx + c

[NTG-context] update

2023-02-23 Thread Hans Hagen via ntg-context
[size=1]{x_1} = \fenced[brace][size=2]{x_2} = \fenced[brace][size=3]{x_3} = \fenced[brace][size=4]{x_4} = \fenced[brace]{\blackrule[width=1cm,height=1cm]} } \im{ \root[4]{1+x^2+a} + \frac{1}{1+x^2+a} + \overparent{1+x^2+a} +

Re: [NTG-context] Suggestions for more math classes?

2022-01-27 Thread Hans Hagen via ntg-context
thus being able to configure them according to taste/need). Q2: Do you have any real examples of constructions with \overbar, \underbar, \overbrace, ... or if you have any strong opinion, please raise your voice! Here is a teaser: \starttext % in context we put digits in their own class, the next

[NTG-context] Suggestions for more math classes?

2022-01-27 Thread Mikael Sundqvist via ntg-context
: Do you have any real examples of constructions with \overbar, \underbar, \overbrace, ... or if you have any strong opinion, please raise your voice! /Mikael ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please

Re: [NTG-context] TeX's \downbracefill and \upbracefill

2021-10-12 Thread Rudolf Bahr via ntg-context
be seen which I'd need to typeset a genealogical table. > > > > Now, the commands \downbracefill and \upbracefill are no context commands. > > Please, are there correspondings to them? > $\overbrace{\hbox{}}$ > >

Re: [NTG-context] TeX's \downbracefill and \upbracefill

2021-10-12 Thread Hans Hagen via ntg-context
ext commands. Please, are there correspondings to them? $\overbrace{\hbox{}}$ \mathematics{\overbrace{\hbox{}}} - Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE Ridderstraat 27 | 8

Re: [NTG-context] interlaced overbrace and underbrace

2019-10-25 Thread Hans Hagen
On 10/25/2019 4:54 PM, mf wrote: Hello list, is there a better way to interlace overbraces and underbraces like this? \starttext These are the expressions to combine: $$\overbrace{a+b+c}+d \quad a+\underbrace{b+c+d}$$ This is the desired result: $$\overbrace{a+b+c}+d \kern-16mm\underbrace

[NTG-context] interlaced overbrace and underbrace

2019-10-25 Thread mf
Hello list, is there a better way to interlace overbraces and underbraces like this? \starttext These are the expressions to combine: $$\overbrace{a+b+c}+d \quad a+\underbrace{b+c+d}$$ This is the desired result: $$\overbrace{a+b+c}+d \kern-16mm\underbrace{\hbox to 15mm{ }}$$ \blank {\tfx

[NTG-context] Macro to write a vector with Metafun (again)

2018-12-04 Thread Fabrice Couvreur
rnative=mp] \setupmathstackers [bottom] [color=darkred, alternative=mp] \starttext $\overbracket {a+b+c+d} \quad \underbracket{a+b+c+d} \quad \doublebracket{a+b+c+d}$ \blank $\overparent{a+b+c+d} \quad \underparent {a+b+c+d} \quad \doubleparent {a+b+c+d}$ \blank $\overbrace {a+b+

Re: [NTG-context] Fwd: Macro to write a vector (Metafun) is broken

2018-03-22 Thread Fabrice Couvreur
myself back together, by ignoring everything up to the next `;'. Please insert a semicolon now in front of anything that you don't want me to delete. (See Chapter 27 of The METAFONTbook for an example.) [1] 51 52 $\overbracket {a+b+c+d} \quad \underbracket{a+b+c+d} \quad 53

Re: [NTG-context] Fwd: Macro to write a vector (Metafun) is broken

2018-03-22 Thread Hans Hagen
c+d} \quad \doubleparent {a+b+c+d}$ \blank $\overbrace {a+b+c+d} \quad \underbrace {a+b+c+d} \quad \doublebrace {a+b+c+d}$ \blank $\overbar {a+b+c+d} \quad \underbar{a+b+c+d} \quad \doublebar{a+b+c+d}$ \blank $\overleftarrow {a+b+c+d} \quad \overrightarrow {a+b+c+d

[NTG-context] Macro to write a vector (Metafun) is broken

2018-03-20 Thread Fabrice Couvreur
thstackers [bottom] [color=darkred, alternative=mp] \starttext $\overbracket {a+b+c+d} \quad \underbracket{a+b+c+d} \quad \doublebracket{a+b+c+d}$ \blank $\overparent{a+b+c+d} \quad \underparent {a+b+c+d} \quad \doubleparent {a+b+c+d}$ \blank $\overbrace {a+b+c+d} \quad \

[NTG-context] MnSymbol vectors and goodie file

2017-08-21 Thread Никола Милинковић
ouple of questions. MnSymbol font consists of following files in several design sizes: - MnSymbolA*.tfm - arrows - MnSymbolB*.tfm - negated (stroked) arrows - MnSymbolC*.tfm - binary operators - MnSymbolD*.tfm - relations - MnSymbolE*.tfm - brackets, braces, parens, sqrt, overbrace, widehat,... - Mn

Re: [NTG-context] Package esvect and Context

2016-06-15 Thread Fabrice Couvreur
=darkred, >alternative=mp] > > \setupmathstackers > [bottom] > [color=darkred, >alternative=mp] > > \starttext > > $\overbracket {a+b+c+d} \quad \underbracket{a+b+c+d} \quad > \doublebracket{a+b+c+d}$ \blank > $\overparent{a+b+c+d} \quad

Re: [NTG-context] Package esvect and Context

2016-06-15 Thread Wolfgang Schuster
+b+c+d} \quad \underbracket{a+b+c+d} \quad \doublebracket{a+b+c+d}$ \blank $\overparent{a+b+c+d} \quad \underparent {a+b+c+d} \quad \doubleparent {a+b+c+d}$ \blank $\overbrace {a+b+c+d} \quad \underbrace {a+b+c+d} \quad \doublebrace {a+b+c+d}$ \blank $\overbar {a+b+c+d}

Re: [NTG-context] Package esvect and Context

2016-06-07 Thread Fabrice Couvreur
\stopMPextensions > > \startuniqueMPgraphic{math:stacker:\number"2190} > math_stacker_draw(math_stacker_leftarrow_shape) ; > \stopuniqueMPgraphic > > \startuniqueMPgraphic{math:stacker:\number"2192} > math_stacker_draw(math_stacker_rightarrow_shape) ; > \stopu

Re: [NTG-context] Package esvect and Context

2016-06-06 Thread Hans Hagen
d}$ \blank $\overbrace {a+b+c+d} \quad \underbrace {a+b+c+d} \quad \doublebrace {a+b+c+d}$ \blank $\overbar {a+b+c+d} \quad \underbar{a+b+c+d} \quad \doublebar{a+b+c+d}$ \blank $\overleftarrow {a+b+c+d} \quad \overrightarrow {a+b+c+d} $ \blank $\underleftarrow {a+b+

Re: [NTG-context] Is there a convenient way to annotate equations?

2014-09-10 Thread Wolfgang Schuster
Am 09.09.2014 um 18:44 schrieb seasoul : > Is there an already-exsting or easy way to add annotations to equations, just > something like > > annotation1.png You can use the \underbrace and \overbrace commands. \starttext \startformula \underbrace{f(n)}_{\text{Output}} =

Re: [NTG-context] underbraces get progressively more misaligned (w/ minimal example)

2014-07-03 Thread Wolfgang Schuster
gt; ["023DF] > > Other underextensibles include \underbar: > > \definemathunderextensible [vfenced] [underbar] ["FE33F] > % ["203E] > > So I tried my example replacing \underbrace with \underbar but the > alignment comes out fine (and \overbrace works fine too).

Re: [NTG-context] underbraces get progressively more misaligned (w/ minimal example)

2014-07-03 Thread Sanjoy Mahajan
[vfenced] [underbar] ["FE33F] % ["203E] So I tried my example replacing \underbrace with \underbar but the alignment comes out fine (and \overbrace works fine too). So that debugging idea didn't work, except to indicate that something special about underbrace isn't wo

Re: [NTG-context] underbraces slightly too narrow (with MkIV 2013.05.28)

2013-07-11 Thread Hans Hagen
spects of open type math that still inherits old stuff) so in a next version you can do this: \setupmathstackers[vfenced][hoffset=10pt] is it looks like these commands have built-in \limits, these are now set for \overbrace \overparent \overbracket \overbar \underbrace \underparent \underbrack