2024 at 11:00 PM wrote:
>> >
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > With the below, the overbraces appear too high (the underbraces are in
>> the right position)
>> >
>> > \starttext
>> > \switchtobodyfont[concrete]
>> > \startformula
>>
ou get, so I don't know what you expect.)
>
> /Mikael
>
> On Sat, Nov 2, 2024 at 11:00 PM wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > With the below, the overbraces appear too high (the underbraces are in
> the right position)
> >
> > \starttext
> right position)
>
> \starttext
> \switchtobodyfont[concrete]
> \startformula
> \overbrace{a+a}
> \underbrace{a+a}
> \stopformula
> \stoptext
>
> Would appreciate if somebody can tell me if they see the same, or if this is
> a bug. The version of ConTeXt I use is
Hi,
With the below, the overbraces appear too high (the underbraces are in the
right position)
\starttext
\switchtobodyfont[concrete]
\startformula
\overbrace{a+a}
\underbrace{a+a}
\stopformula
\stoptext
Would appreciate if somebody can tell me if they see the same, or if this is a
bug. The
xt here}}
> \stopformula
>
> I've tried using \blank and \vspace, but to no avail. For example:
>
> \underbrace{x+y+z}_{\blank[1cm]\mathrm{my text here}}
> ...does not work.
>
> The documentation on underbrace (and overbrace, underbracket, etc...) in the
> ContextGar
gt; >>
> >>> The documentation on underbrace (and overbrace, underbracket, etc...)
> in
> >>> the ContextGarden wiki seems to be very limited, and I was not able to
> find
> >>> any user-supplied arguments for increasing this vertical distance.
> &g
blank[1cm]\mathrm{my text here}}
> > ...does not work.
> >
> > The documentation on underbrace (and overbrace, underbracket, etc...) in
> > the ContextGarden wiki seems to be very limited, and I was not able to
> find
> > any user-supplied arguments for increasing this
Aditya Mahajan schrieb am 18.12.2023 um 21:55:
On Mon, 18 Dec 2023, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
On Mon, 18 Dec 2023, Dean Hung wrote:
The documentation on underbrace (and overbrace, underbracket, etc...) in
the ContextGarden wiki seems to be very limited, and I was not able to find
any user
On Mon, 18 Dec 2023, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
> On Mon, 18 Dec 2023, Dean Hung wrote:
>
> > The documentation on underbrace (and overbrace, underbracket, etc...) in
> > the ContextGarden wiki seems to be very limited, and I was not able to find
> > any user-supplied argum
pformula
>
> I've tried using \blank and \vspace, but to no avail. For example:
>
> \underbrace{x+y+z}_{\blank[1cm]\mathrm{my text here}}
> ...does not work.
>
> The documentation on underbrace (and overbrace, underbracket, etc...) in
> the ContextGarden wiki seems to b
ample:
\underbrace{x+y+z}_{\blank[1cm]\mathrm{my text here}}
...does not work.
The documentation on underbrace (and overbrace, underbracket, etc...) in
the ContextGarden wiki seems to be very limited, and I was not able to find
any user-supplied arguments for increasing this vertical distance.
Ther
Hi Hans,
Thank you very much for the new update.
Everything seem to work like a charm. In particular I played with the
\underbrace and \overbrace when adding something under the \underbrace, or
above the \overbrace, like in
\startformula
\overbrace{1+x^2+a}^{= -1} +
\underbrace{ax^2 + bx + c
[size=1]{x_1} =
\fenced[brace][size=2]{x_2} =
\fenced[brace][size=3]{x_3} =
\fenced[brace][size=4]{x_4} =
\fenced[brace]{\blackrule[width=1cm,height=1cm]}
}
\im{
\root[4]{1+x^2+a} +
\frac{1}{1+x^2+a} +
\overparent{1+x^2+a} +
thus being
able to configure them according to taste/need).
Q2: Do you have any real examples of constructions with \overbar,
\underbar, \overbrace, ... or if you have any strong opinion, please
raise your voice!
Here is a teaser:
\starttext
% in context we put digits in their own class, the next
: Do you have any real examples of constructions with \overbar,
\underbar, \overbrace, ... or if you have any strong opinion, please
raise your voice!
/Mikael
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please
be seen which I'd need to typeset a genealogical table.
> >
> > Now, the commands \downbracefill and \upbracefill are no context commands.
> > Please, are there correspondings to them?
> $\overbrace{\hbox{}}$
>
>
ext commands.
Please, are there correspondings to them?
$\overbrace{\hbox{}}$
\mathematics{\overbrace{\hbox{}}}
-
Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
Ridderstraat 27 | 8
On 10/25/2019 4:54 PM, mf wrote:
Hello list,
is there a better way to interlace overbraces and underbraces like this?
\starttext
These are the expressions to combine:
$$\overbrace{a+b+c}+d \quad a+\underbrace{b+c+d}$$
This is the desired result:
$$\overbrace{a+b+c}+d \kern-16mm\underbrace
Hello list,
is there a better way to interlace overbraces and underbraces like this?
\starttext
These are the expressions to combine:
$$\overbrace{a+b+c}+d \quad a+\underbrace{b+c+d}$$
This is the desired result:
$$\overbrace{a+b+c}+d \kern-16mm\underbrace{\hbox to 15mm{ }}$$
\blank
{\tfx
rnative=mp]
\setupmathstackers
[bottom]
[color=darkred,
alternative=mp]
\starttext
$\overbracket {a+b+c+d} \quad \underbracket{a+b+c+d} \quad
\doublebracket{a+b+c+d}$ \blank
$\overparent{a+b+c+d} \quad \underparent {a+b+c+d} \quad
\doubleparent {a+b+c+d}$ \blank
$\overbrace {a+b+
myself back together, by ignoring
everything up to the next `;'. Please insert a semicolon
now in front of anything that you don't want me to delete.
(See Chapter 27 of The METAFONTbook for an example.)
[1]
51
52 $\overbracket {a+b+c+d} \quad \underbracket{a+b+c+d} \quad
53
c+d} \quad
\doubleparent {a+b+c+d}$ \blank
$\overbrace {a+b+c+d} \quad \underbrace {a+b+c+d} \quad
\doublebrace {a+b+c+d}$ \blank
$\overbar {a+b+c+d} \quad \underbar{a+b+c+d} \quad
\doublebar{a+b+c+d}$ \blank
$\overleftarrow {a+b+c+d} \quad \overrightarrow {a+b+c+d
thstackers
[bottom]
[color=darkred,
alternative=mp]
\starttext
$\overbracket {a+b+c+d} \quad \underbracket{a+b+c+d} \quad
\doublebracket{a+b+c+d}$ \blank
$\overparent{a+b+c+d} \quad \underparent {a+b+c+d} \quad
\doubleparent {a+b+c+d}$ \blank
$\overbrace {a+b+c+d} \quad \
ouple of questions.
MnSymbol font consists of following files in several design sizes:
- MnSymbolA*.tfm - arrows
- MnSymbolB*.tfm - negated (stroked) arrows
- MnSymbolC*.tfm - binary operators
- MnSymbolD*.tfm - relations
- MnSymbolE*.tfm - brackets, braces, parens, sqrt, overbrace, widehat,...
- Mn
=darkred,
>alternative=mp]
>
> \setupmathstackers
> [bottom]
> [color=darkred,
>alternative=mp]
>
> \starttext
>
> $\overbracket {a+b+c+d} \quad \underbracket{a+b+c+d} \quad
> \doublebracket{a+b+c+d}$ \blank
> $\overparent{a+b+c+d} \quad
+b+c+d} \quad \underbracket{a+b+c+d} \quad
\doublebracket{a+b+c+d}$ \blank
$\overparent{a+b+c+d} \quad \underparent {a+b+c+d} \quad
\doubleparent {a+b+c+d}$ \blank
$\overbrace {a+b+c+d} \quad \underbrace {a+b+c+d} \quad
\doublebrace {a+b+c+d}$ \blank
$\overbar {a+b+c+d}
\stopMPextensions
>
> \startuniqueMPgraphic{math:stacker:\number"2190}
> math_stacker_draw(math_stacker_leftarrow_shape) ;
> \stopuniqueMPgraphic
>
> \startuniqueMPgraphic{math:stacker:\number"2192}
> math_stacker_draw(math_stacker_rightarrow_shape) ;
> \stopu
d}$ \blank
$\overbrace {a+b+c+d} \quad \underbrace {a+b+c+d} \quad
\doublebrace {a+b+c+d}$ \blank
$\overbar {a+b+c+d} \quad \underbar{a+b+c+d} \quad
\doublebar{a+b+c+d}$ \blank
$\overleftarrow {a+b+c+d} \quad \overrightarrow {a+b+c+d} $ \blank
$\underleftarrow {a+b+
Am 09.09.2014 um 18:44 schrieb seasoul :
> Is there an already-exsting or easy way to add annotations to equations, just
> something like
>
> annotation1.png
You can use the \underbrace and \overbrace commands.
\starttext
\startformula
\underbrace{f(n)}_{\text{Output}} =
gt; ["023DF]
>
> Other underextensibles include \underbar:
>
> \definemathunderextensible [vfenced] [underbar] ["FE33F]
> % ["203E]
>
> So I tried my example replacing \underbrace with \underbar but the
> alignment comes out fine (and \overbrace works fine too).
[vfenced] [underbar] ["FE33F]
% ["203E]
So I tried my example replacing \underbrace with \underbar but the
alignment comes out fine (and \overbrace works fine too). So that
debugging idea didn't work, except to indicate that something special
about underbrace isn't wo
spects of open type math that
still inherits old stuff) so in a next version you can do this:
\setupmathstackers[vfenced][hoffset=10pt]
is it looks like these commands have built-in \limits, these are now set
for
\overbrace
\overparent
\overbracket
\overbar
\underbrace
\underparent
\underbrack
32 matches
Mail list logo
