\type{$\vec{AB}$} : $\vec{AB}$
> \stoptext
>
> The result with the latest ConTeXt version:
>
>
>
> and with the version from a year ago:
>
>
>
> I am aware that I could use \overrightarrow, but I prefer the shape and
> position of the \vec arrow, especially with sing
iqueCollé-2.pdf
Description: Adobe PDF document
I am aware that I could use \overrightarrow, but I prefer the shape and position of the \vec arrow, especially with single letters.
GraphiqueCollé-3.pdf
Description: Adobe PDF document
GraphiqueCollé-4.pdf
Description: Adobe PDF document
What is th
el
>
> On Fri, Jan 20, 2023 at 2:45 PM Alexandre Christe via ntg-context
> wrote:
> >
> > I confirm the behavior.
> >
> > Also possibly linked is that the spacing around $\overrightarrow{k}$
> seems pretty weird, so atm there is no fallback solution.
> &g
he spacing around $\overrightarrow{k}$ seems
> pretty weird, so atm there is no fallback solution.
>
>
>
> Le ven. 20 janv. 2023 à 14:37, Alan Braslau via ntg-context
> a écrit :
>>
>> MWE:
>>
>> \starttext
>>
>> $\vec{k}$
>>
>> \s
I confirm the behavior.
Also possibly linked is that the spacing around $\overrightarrow{k}$ seems
pretty weird, so atm there is no fallback solution.
Le ven. 20 janv. 2023 à 14:37, Alan Braslau via ntg-context <
ntg-context@ntg.nl> a écrit :
> MWE:
>
> \starttext
>
> $\
$\vec{AB}$
\stoptext
The result with the latest ConTeXt version:
GraphiqueCollé-1.pdf
Description: Adobe PDF document
and with the version from a year ago:
GraphiqueCollé-2.pdf
Description: Adobe PDF document
I am aware that I could use \overrightarrow, but I prefer the shape and
positi
,shorten >=-1pt] (arg.north west) -- (arg.north east);
\stoptikzpicture
}
\starttext
\m{x + z_{\vector{U}} + x}
\m{x + \mathord{\vector{U}}^^z + x}
\m{x + \overrightarrow{U}^^z + x}
\stoptext
-
c+d} \quad \underbrace {a+b+c+d} \quad
\doublebrace {a+b+c+d}$ \blank
$\overbar {a+b+c+d} \quad \underbar{a+b+c+d} \quad
\doublebar{a+b+c+d}$ \blank
$\overleftarrow {a+b+c+d} \quad \overrightarrow {a+b+c+d} $ \blank
$\underleftarrow {a+b+c+d} \quad \underrightarrow {a+b+c+d
myself back together, by ignoring
everything up to the next `;'. Please insert a semicolon
now in front of anything that you don't want me to delete.
(See Chapter 27 of The METAFONTbook for an example.)
[1]
51
52 $\overbracket {a+b+c+d} \quad \underbracket{a+b+c+d} \quad
53
c+d} \quad
\doubleparent {a+b+c+d}$ \blank
$\overbrace {a+b+c+d} \quad \underbrace {a+b+c+d} \quad
\doublebrace {a+b+c+d}$ \blank
$\overbar {a+b+c+d} \quad \underbar{a+b+c+d} \quad
\doublebar{a+b+c+d}$ \blank
$\overleftarrow {a+b+c+d} \quad \overrightarrow {a+b+c+d
underbrace {a+b+c+d} \quad
\doublebrace {a+b+c+d}$ \blank
$\overbar {a+b+c+d} \quad \underbar{a+b+c+d} \quad
\doublebar{a+b+c+d}$ \blank
$\overleftarrow {a+b+c+d} \quad \overrightarrow {a+b+c+d} $ \blank
$\underleftarrow {a+b+c+d} \quad \underrightarrow {a+b+c+d} $ \blank
r:\number"2192}
>> math_stacker_draw(math_stacker_rightarrow_shape) ;
>> \stopuniqueMPgraphic
>>
>> % so far
>>
>> \setupmathstackers
>> [both] % vfenced
% so far
\setupmathstackers
[both] % vfenced]
[color=darkred,
alternative=mp]
\setupmathstackers
[top]
[color=darkred,
alternative=mp]
\setupmathstackers
[bottom]
[color=darkred,
alternative=mp]
\starttext
$\overrightarrow {i}$
rs
[top]
[color=darkred,
alternative=mp]
\setupmathstackers
[bottom]
[color=darkred,
alternative=mp]
\starttext
$\overrightarrow {i}$
\stoptext
___
If your question is of interest to others as well,
\underparent {a+b+c+d} \quad
> \doubleparent {a+b+c+d}$ \blank
> $\overbrace {a+b+c+d} \quad \underbrace {a+b+c+d} \quad
> \doublebrace {a+b+c+d}$ \blank
> $\overbar {a+b+c+d} \quad \underbar{a+b+c+d} \quad
> \doublebar{a+b+c+d}$ \blank
>
> $\overl
\quad \underbar{a+b+c+d} \quad
\doublebar{a+b+c+d}$ \blank
$\overleftarrow {a+b+c+d} \quad \overrightarrow {a+b+c+d} $ \blank
$\underleftarrow {a+b+c+d} \quad \underrightarrow {a+b+c+d} $ \blank
\stoptext
Wo
niqueMPgraphic
>
> % so far
>
> \setupmathstackers
> [both] % vfenced]
> [color=darkred,
>alternative=mp]
>
> \setupmathstackers
> [top]
> [color=darkred,
>alternative=mp]
>
>
d}$ \blank
$\overbrace {a+b+c+d} \quad \underbrace {a+b+c+d} \quad
\doublebrace {a+b+c+d}$ \blank
$\overbar {a+b+c+d} \quad \underbar{a+b+c+d} \quad
\doublebar{a+b+c+d}$ \blank
$\overleftarrow {a+b+c+d} \quad \overrightarrow {a+b+c+d} $ \blank
$\underleftarrow {a+b+
way to achieve that in Context, I don't know.
>
> \setupbodyfont[xits]
>
> \starttext
>
> \starttabulate[|l|lm|]
> \NC \tex{overleftarrow} \NC \overleftarrow{top} \NC\NR
> \NC \tex{overrightarrow} \NC \overrightarrow{text} \NC\NR
> \NC \tex{overl
mething like
> \math{\overset{f}{-\kern-1ex\rightarrowtriangle}}
> There might be a better way to achieve that in Context, I don't know.
\setupbodyfont[xits]
\starttext
\starttabulate[|l|lm|]
\NC \tex{overleftarrow} \NC \overleftarrow{top} \NC\NR
\NC \tex{overrig
fontfamily [mainface] [sans] [DejaVu Sans]
>> \definefontfamily [mainface] [mono] [DejaVu Sans Mono] [feature=none]
>> \definefontfamily [mainface] [math] [TeX Gyre Pagella Math][scale=1..12]
>>
>>
>> \setupbodyfont[mainface]
>>
>> \starttext
>> $
>
][scale=1..12]
\setupbodyfont[mainface]
\starttext
$
\overrightarrow{AB}
\overrightarrow{BA}
\overrightarrow{AC}
\overrightarrow{CA}
\overrightarrow{AD}
\overrightarrow{DA}
\overrightarrow{BC}
\overrightarrow{CB}
\overrightarrow{BD}
\overrightarrow{DB}
\overrightarrow{CD}
\overrightarrow{DC
] [TeX Gyre Pagella Math][scale=1.12]
\setupbodyfont[mainface]
\starttext
$
\overrightarrow{AB}
\overrightarrow{BA}
\overrightarrow{AC}
\overrightarrow{CA}
\overrightarrow{AD}
\overrightarrow{DA}
\overrightarrow{BC}
\overrightarrow{CB}
\overrightarrow{BD}
\overrightarrow{DB}
\overrightarrow{CD
On 3/2/2013 1:11 AM, Marcin Borkowski wrote:
I have an issue with \overrightarrow being positioned under its
argument. I've read on the list that this is now fixed, but... I
can't upgrade! This is because I'm preparing a document in an
"incremental" way, that
Hi all,
I have an issue with \overrightarrow being positioned under its
argument. I've read on the list that this is now fixed, but... I
can't upgrade! This is because I'm preparing a document in an
"incremental" way, that is, I'm preparing course materials (pr
documentation is.
regards
Keith.
Am 27.01.2013 um 21:40 schrieb Hans Hagen :
> On 1/27/2013 5:24 PM, Mikael P. Sundqvist wrote:
>> Dear list,
>>
>> \starttext
>> text $\overrightarrow{OP}$ text
>> \stoptext
>>
>> gives smaller letters since some time
On 27 janv. 2013, at 21:40, Hans Hagen wrote:
> […]
> fixed. some more info about the updated mkiv arrow related mechanisms can be
> found in
>
> http://www.pragma-ade.com/general/manuals/about.pdf
>
> (btw, one needs the latest greatest lm/gyre math fonts)
>
> Hans
This is an amazing progr
On 1/27/2013 5:24 PM, Mikael P. Sundqvist wrote:
Dear list,
\starttext
text $\overrightarrow{OP}$ text
\stoptext
gives smaller letters since some time ago under the arrow. See the
attached pdf files for the output of different versions of context
(test.pdf is compiled with the latest beta).
I
Dear list,
\starttext
text $\overrightarrow{OP}$ text
\stoptext
gives smaller letters since some time ago under the arrow. See the
attached pdf files for the output of different versions of context
(test.pdf is compiled with the latest beta).
I think the look in test20121210.pdf is the right
Dear Rogers,
It works fine after updating.
Thank you for checking.
Best regards,
Dalyoung
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / ht
arrow instead of over right
arrow.
Would you please check it?
\starttext
$\overrightarrow{AB}$
\stoptext
Thanks.
Best regards,
Dalyoung
ConTeXt ver: 2012.10.06 15:31 MKIV fmt: 2012.10.8 int: english/english
___
I
Dear all.
The following short sample gives a under right arrow instead of over right
arrow.
Would you please check it?
\starttext
$\overrightarrow{AB}$
\stoptext
Thanks.
Best regards,
Dalyoung
ConTeXt ver: 2012.10.06 15:31 MKIV fmt: 2012.10.8 int: english/english
Hi Taco,
> Have you tried the new current yet? There was a whole bunch of extra
> \unexpanded-s in it already.
You're right, thanks! I had built the new context but forgot to install it on
this particular machine :-)
Sorry for the noise,
Matthijs
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_
Matthijs Kooijman wrote:
Hi all,
I've been trying to use the \overrightarrow command within a metapost graphic,
but it doesn't work. Math mode does work, for example \vec works like
expected. Outside of metapost, \overrightarrow works as expected.
This seems to broken for exten
Hi all,
> >I've been trying to use the \overrightarrow command within a metapost
> >graphic,
> >but it doesn't work. Math mode does work, for example \vec works like
> >expected. Outside of metapost, \overrightarrow works as expected.
This seems to brok
Aditya Mahajan wrote:
\let\normaloverrightarrow\overrightarrow
\unexpanded\def\overrightarrow{\normaloverrightarrow}
ok, i made them all unexpandable
-
Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
Hi Aditya,
> \let\normaloverrightarrow\overrightarrow
> \unexpanded\def\overrightarrow{\normaloverrightarrow}
I haven't got a clue what this means, but it worked! Thanks!
Gr.
Matthijs
signature.asc
Description: Digita
On Fri, 18 Sep 2009, Matthijs Kooijman wrote:
Hi,
I've been trying to use the \overrightarrow command within a metapost graphic,
but it doesn't work. Math mode does work, for example \vec works like
expected. Outside of metapost, \overrightarrow works as expected.
To illustrate t
Hi,
I've been trying to use the \overrightarrow command within a metapost graphic,
but it doesn't work. Math mode does work, for example \vec works like
expected. Outside of metapost, \overrightarrow works as expected.
To illustrate the problem, I've created the following
Aditya Mahajan wrote:
On Wed, 13 May 2009, Flavien Lambert wrote:
In the following example, it is the ";" that leads to the error
\def\vect#1{%
\overrightarrow{#1}
}
\starttext
$({\rm O};\vect{e_{x}})$
\stoptext
If you suppress it, it works fine. (???)
Taco, the error also o
Flavien Lambert wrote:
In the following example, it is the ";" that leads to the error
\def\vect#1{%
\overrightarrow{#1}
}
\starttext
$({\rm O};\vect{e_{x}})$
\stoptext
math-noa.lua:
if nc == "po" then
On Wed, 13 May 2009, Flavien Lambert wrote:
In the following example, it is the ";" that leads to the error
\def\vect#1{%
\overrightarrow{#1}
}
\starttext
$({\rm O};\vect{e_{x}})$
\stoptext
If you suppress it, it works fine. (???)
Taco, the error also occurs with cambria. S
In the following example, it is the ";" that leads to the error
\def\vect#1{%
\overrightarrow{#1}
}
\starttext
$({\rm O};\vect{e_{x}})$
\stoptext
If you suppress it, it works fine. (???)
2009/5/13 Aditya Mahajan
> On Wed, 13 May 2009, Flavien Lambert wrote:
>
> Dea
... M décrit l'axe $({\rm O};\vect{e_{x}})$
avec une vitesse
$\dot{x}...
I have absolutely no idea what it is trying to say to me...
If related, the macro is defined by
\def\vect#1{%
\overrightarrow{#1}
}
Can you create a minimum example.
\vect{e_{x}})$
avec une vitesse
$\dot{x}...
I have absolutely no idea what it is trying to say to me...
If related, the macro is defined by
\def\vect#1{%
\overrightarrow{#1}
}
Regards,
--
Flavien.
"Quantum objects are compl
On Wed, 30 Jul 2008, Jesse Alama wrote:
> Something goes wrong with this simple example:
\definematharrow needs three arguments, the second is bunch
of digits representing distance corrections. See the My Way on arrows and
math-ext.tex.
> \definemathoverarrow [overrigh
Something goes wrong with this simple example:
<--- snip --->
\definemathoverarrow [overrightarrow] [\rightarrowfill]
\def\Ray#1{\overrightarrow{#1}}
\starttext
Hello world! $\Ray{ABC}$.
\stoptext
<--- snip --->
It leads to:
! Missin
On Sat, 30 Jun 2007, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
On 6/29/07, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
Actually just adding overleftrightarrow is easy, but better will be an
interface to easily define such commands. So
> If not, what can I do so that I can use it?
ConTeXt uses overleftarrow and overrightarrow
a geometry course using ConTeXt and am impressed with the
>>>> system so far. One thing I need is to do is typeset various geometrical
>>>> symbols. It looks like ConTeXt already has the \overleftarrow and
>>>> \overrightarrow commands, but one thing I'd li
so far. One thing I need is to do is typeset various geometrical
>>> symbols. It looks like ConTeXt already has the \overleftarrow and
>>> \overrightarrow commands, but one thing I'd like to have is
>>> \overleftrightarrow, for typesetting the symbol customarily used to
It looks like ConTeXt already has the \overleftarrow and
>> \overrightarrow commands, but one thing I'd like to have is
>> \overleftrightarrow, for typesetting the symbol customarily used to
>> denote the line determined by two points. It seems, though, that this
>>
On 6/29/07, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
> Actually just adding overleftrightarrow is easy, but better will be an
> interface to easily define such commands. So
>
> > If not, what can I do so that I can use it?
>
> ConTeXt uses overleftarrow and overrightarrow as defined in p
On Thu, 28 Jun 2007, Jesse Alama wrote:
> I'm preparing a geometry course using ConTeXt and am impressed with the
> system so far. One thing I need is to do is typeset various geometrical
> symbols. It looks like ConTeXt already has the \overleftarrow and
> \overrightarrow
I'm preparing a geometry course using ConTeXt and am impressed with the
system so far. One thing I need is to do is typeset various geometrical
symbols. It looks like ConTeXt already has the \overleftarrow and
\overrightarrow commands, but one thing I'd like to have is
\overleftright
ll the possible and impossible math features. I'm now trying to spot
the most appropriate place in the wiki tu put that example there, but
I really think that you should put it in one if your manuals as a
really nice example.
Mojca
PS: I have another nice math challenge for you or Taco ;)
(a hybrid of overline/overrightarrow/vec/"overrigharpoonup" for
denoting vectors, but I'll use another thread)
___
ntg-context mailing list
ntg-context@ntg.nl
http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
Hi all,
I use \setupindenting[medium,yes] in my document.
When I use:
\placeformula[GiPivel]
\startformula
\frac{\overrightarrow{G_iP_i}}{\Delta T} = \frac{d_i.\vec{y_i} +
\delta_i.\vec{t_i}}{\Delta T
ect?
% I also had to define [EMAIL PROTECTED] once more, which is not very elegant,
% but I don't know any other way
\unprotect
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
% The TeXBOOK, page 358, modified \longrightarrow
% for some reason, the harpoon and line are not 100% perfectly joined
\def\longrightharpoonup{\relb
57 matches
Mail list logo
