[NTG-context] barring changes

Please consider the attached example – some of the “barring” macros are defunct already for a while, some more within a TABLE: \underbar works, but not in TABLE \underbarsworks \underdot doesn’t work \underdotsdoesn’t work \underdashdoesn’t work \underdashes doesn’t work

Re: [NTG-context] double underbars

; - A dotted underbar > >>> - A combination of both > >>> > >>> Is there a way to combine them? I was hoping to have the dotted > >>> variant > >> above the normal bar. > >> > >> I would like to have th

Re: [NTG-context] double underbars

>> - A combination of both >>> >>> Is there a way to combine them? I was hoping to have the dotted variant >> above the normal bar. >> >> I would like to have this type of “complete” bar nesting as well. >> >> As it stands, you can nest \underba

Re: [NTG-context] double underbars

work. Interoperability between these (as well as \underdot, \underdash, \underrandom ...) would be really cool. Either with \bar or a nestable dy-shift version of textbackgrounds would be really handy sometimes. :) \startbar[under,over,strikethrough] ... \stopbar ? \barbar[top=single

Re: [NTG-context] double underbars

this type of “complete” bar nesting as well. > > As it stands, you can nest \underbars inside \underbars and \overstrikes > inside \overstrikes and \overbars inside \overbars, but no other > combinations work. Interoperability between these (as well as \underdot, > \underdash, \underrandom

Re: [NTG-context] double underbars

Interoperability between these (as well as \underdot, \underdash, \underrandom ...) would be really cool. Either with \bar or a nestable dy-shift version of textbackgrounds would be really handy sometimes. :) > > This is not working > > %%%

Re: [NTG-context] How can I define a dotted underbar in ConTeXt?

\underrandoms{test me}} and \underrandom{test} or \underrandom{grep} \blank test {\red\underdashes {test me}} and \underdash {test} or \underdash {grep} \blank test {\red\underdots {test me}} and \underdot {test} or \underdot {grep} \blank How do you change the thickness of the dots (i.e., set

Re: [NTG-context] How can I define a dotted underbar in ConTeXt?

\underrandoms{test me}} and \underrandom{test} or \underrandom{grep} \blank test {\red\underdashes {test me}} and \underdash {test} or \underdash {grep} \blank test {\red\underdots {test me}} and \underdot {test} or \underdot {grep} \blank still somewhat experimental While you are looking

Re: [NTG-context] How can I define a dotted underbar in ConTeXt?

} or \underrandom{grep} \blank test {\red\underdashes {test me}} and \underdash {test} or \underdash {grep} \blank test {\red\underdots {test me}} and \underdot {test} or \underdot {grep} \blank still somewhat experimental While you are looking at the code, there was another question

Re: [NTG-context] How can I define a dotted underbar in ConTeXt?

} or \underrandom{grep} \blank test {\red\underdashes {test me}} and \underdash {test} or \underdash {grep} \blank test {\red\underdots {test me}} and \underdot {test} or \underdot {grep} \blank How do you change the thickness of the dots (i.e., set the value of RuleFactor)? Aditya

Re: [NTG-context] How can I define a dotted underbar in ConTeXt?

a beta where you can test: test {\red\underrandoms{test me}} and \underrandom{test} or \underrandom{grep} \blank test {\red\underdashes {test me}} and \underdash {test} or \underdash {grep} \blank test {\red\underdots {test me}} and \underdot {test} or \underdot {grep} \blank still so

Re: [NTG-context] How can I define a dotted underbar in ConTeXt?

m{test} or > \underrandom{grep} \blank > test {\red\underdashes {test me}} and \underdash {test} or \underdash {grep} > \blank > test {\red\underdots {test me}} and \underdot {test} or \underdot {grep}

Re: [NTG-context] How can I define a dotted underbar in ConTeXt?

\underdashes {test me}} and \underdash {test} or \underdash {grep} \blank test {\red\underdots {test me}} and \underdot {test} or \underdot {grep} \blank still somewhat experimental Hans