o get some working examples using the second answer here:
https://tex.stackexchange.com/questions/42456/creating-non-math-mode-substitutes-for-overset-and-underset-not-dependent-on-t
But, I was just curious if there is a more
Yes. \overset and \underset were ported to context some months back.
If you have a recent install, both should work.
Aditya
On Fri, 31 Aug 2007, Liesbeth van der Plas wrote:
Is there an equivalent of the amstex *\overset* macro? I couldn't find it in
your articles.
Liesbeth
2007/8/27
It doesn't work, so I haven't got it. Can I get the source .tex of \overset
and \underset and use \input instead of reinstalling things? It costed me a
lot of time to get everything work all right, so I am not very eager to risk
spoiling things (I used the ProText cd-rom for Windows).
Liesbeth
On Fri, 31 Aug 2007, Liesbeth van der Plas wrote:
It doesn't work, so I haven't got it. Can I get the source .tex of \overset
and \underset and use \input instead of reinstalling things? It costed me a
lot of time to get everything work all right, so I am not very eager to risk
spoiling
Hi,
In doing my Latex to Context conversion, I stumbled on two Latex math
commands : \overset and \underset
as in
\mathcal{T} = \overset{\infty}{ \underset{r,s = 0}{\cup} } \:
\mathcal{T}^{r}_s
The page http://wiki.contextgarden.net/Math_with_amsl mentions the
commands stackrel and underset
On Wed, 2 Aug 2006, WN wrote:
Hi,
In doing my Latex to Context conversion, I stumbled on two Latex math
commands : \overset and \underset
as in
\mathcal{T} = \overset{\infty}{ \underset{r,s = 0}{\cup} } \:
\mathcal{T}^{r}_s
Why not simply use
\mathcal{T} = \bigcup_{r,s=0}^{\infty
[where is the amsl module]
$ kpsewhere t-amsl
/usr/share/texmf-tetex/tex/context/maths/t-amsl.tex
and that's the only one ('locate amsl.tex' confirms it). The
/usr/share context tree is the ancient version that comes with tetex
3.0 (Context 2005.01.31 I think). My ~/texmf tree has the newer
