Am 03.10.23 um 02:06 schrieb Alan Braslau:
On Sun, 1 Oct 2023 10:49:34 +0200
Henning Hraban Ramm wrote:
chem-str.lua seems to be an updated version by Alan & Hans
Did I miss something?
work in progress ... i'm working on that (part of the math upgrade)
so best wait till we're stable
On Sun, 1 Oct 2023 10:49:34 +0200
Henning Hraban Ramm wrote:
> >> chem-str.lua seems to be an updated version by Alan & Hans
> >>
> >> Did I miss something?
> >
> > work in progress ... i'm working on that (part of the math upgrade)
> > so
that there’s still some working code for
chemistry, but it looks very broken.
ppchtex.mkiv is apparently still code from 1996 (and can’t work, since
neither PicTeX nor PStricks are supported in LMTX any more).
chem-str.lua seems to be an updated version by Alan & Hans
Did I miss somet
for
chemistry, but it looks very broken.
ppchtex.mkiv is apparently still code from 1996 (and can’t work, since
neither PicTeX nor PStricks are supported in LMTX any more).
chem-str.lua seems to be an updated version by Alan & Hans
Did I miss something?
work in progress ... i'm wor
.
ppchtex.mkiv is apparently still code from 1996 (and can’t work, since
neither PicTeX nor PStricks are supported in LMTX any more).
chem-str.lua seems to be an updated version by Alan & Hans
Did I miss something?
Hr
Hi Gavin,
maybe you have solved your problem yet.
\startformula
{\null}^^{194}__{38}{\rm Sr}
or {\hbox{Xe}}^^{140}__{54}.
\stopformula
Better, ConTeXt way could be the variation on \chem:
\unexpanded\def\isotope#1#2#3{\dontleavehmode\begingroup\null\lohi[left]{#2}{#3}#1\endgroup}
\isotope{Sr
1 or |, > or some angle bracket?
... of Chemistry:
\startformula CH_4 + OH + HEAT \rightarrow H_2O + CH_2 + H_2EAT\stopformula
% ? Should we something different for chem. formulae?
... of Quantum Gravity:
\startformula SU(2)U(I) \times SU(U(2))\stopformula
% It’s not even an equation...
... of
different
(compatibility) but we can do this:
in chem-str.mkiv:
% \installsimplecommandhandler \??chemical {chemical} \??chemical % no
\define...
\installcommandhandler \??chemical {chemical} \??chemical % no \define...
\let\setupchemicals \setupchemical
\let\definechemicals\definechemical
On 2-6-2012 22:39, Kip Warner wrote:
\starttext
\placeformula[reaction:Sabatier Reaction]
\startformula
\inlinechemical{CO_2,+,4H_2,-,CH_4,+,2H_2O,+,heat}
\stopformula
\stoptext
fixed in next upload.
If you're in a hurry you can change this in chem-str.mkiv:
\unexpanded\def\chemicalsymbol[#1
On Wed, 2012-06-06 at 10:22 +0200, Hans Hagen wrote:
fixed in next upload.
If you're in a hurry you can change this in chem-str.mkiv:
\unexpanded\def\chemicalsymbol[#1]%
{\csname\??chemicalsymbol\ifcsname\??chemicalsymbol#1\endcsname#1\else\s!unknown\fi\endcsname}
Hans
Thanks Hans
On 6-6-2012 23:42, Kip Warner wrote:
On Wed, 2012-06-06 at 10:22 +0200, Hans Hagen wrote:
fixed in next upload.
If you're in a hurry you can change this in chem-str.mkiv:
\unexpanded\def\chemicalsymbol[#1]%
{\csname\??chemicalsymbol\ifcsname\??chemicalsymbol#1\endcsname#1\else\s!unknown\fi
On Wed, 2012-06-06 at 23:49 +0200, Hans Hagen wrote:
i uploaded a beta so the garden version should work ok
Maybe I could just download your copy of the chem-str.mkiv to replace my
own. Do you have a direct link to the revision you just uploaded so that
I can give it a test?
--
Kip Warner
On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 11:54 PM, Kip Warner wrote:
On Wed, 2012-06-06 at 23:49 +0200, Hans Hagen wrote:
i uploaded a beta so the garden version should work ok
Maybe I could just download your copy of the chem-str.mkiv to replace my
own. Do you have a direct link to the revision you just
Hey list,
The following minimal does not appear to typeset the reaction properly
in 2012.05.30.
\starttext
\placeformula[reaction:Sabatier Reaction]
\startformula
\inlinechemical{CO_2,+,4H_2,-,CH_4,+,2H_2O,+,heat}
\stopformula
\stoptext
But maybe I am not doing something right.
--
Kip Warner
On 29-12-2011 04:09, Kip Warner wrote:
Hey folks,
Since I upgraded from the Nov 29th nightly to today's Dec 28th, my
! Undefined control sequence.
argument \@cmstyle
must be something older ... in chem-str.mkiv replace this:
\unexpanded\def\dosetchemicaltext
{\dousestyleparameter
On Thu, 2011-12-29 at 09:49 +0100, Hans Hagen wrote:
On 29-12-2011 04:09, Kip Warner wrote:
Hey folks,
Since I upgraded from the Nov 29th nightly to today's Dec 28th, my
! Undefined control sequence.
argument \@cmstyle
must be something older ... in chem-str.mkiv replace
On 21-6-2011 4:30, Kip Warner wrote:
On Mon, 2011-06-20 at 20:03 +0200, Hans Hagen wrote:
chemical support is not includes so best not load the chem module
Hey Hans,
Sorry, I don't follow. Do you mean chemical support is included by
default and you don't need to explicitly load the module
tried it both with and without
the texlive-math-extra package installed.
chemical support is not includes so best not load the chem module
\chemical{2H_2,+,O_2,-,2H_2O}
\startformula
\chemical{2H_2}{}{}
\stopformula
\startformula
\inlinechemical{2H_2,+,O_2,-,2H_2O}
\stopformula
On Mon, 2011-06-20 at 20:03 +0200, Hans Hagen wrote:
chemical support is not includes so best not load the chem module
Hey Hans,
Sorry, I don't follow. Do you mean chemical support is included by
default and you don't need to explicitly load the module? Are you saying
that the chemic module
On 18-6-2011 7:29, Kip Warner wrote:
Greetings,
I am using ConTeXt head and I am having some issues with the chem
module.
I get the following error:
Math error: parameter \Umathlimit_above_bgap\textstyle is not set ...
My environment file specifies to import the Chemistry module:
\usemodule
On Sat, 2011-06-18 at 11:32 +0200, Hans Hagen wrote:
minimal complete file needed as we need to see what is your font setup
Hey Hans,
The line containing the problematic chemical line is this one:
\chemical{CO_2,PLUS,H_2,PLUS,GIVES,PLUS,O_2,PLUS,CO}
The error is:
! Math error: parameter
Greetings,
I am using ConTeXt head and I am having some issues with the chem
module.
I get the following error:
Math error: parameter \Umathlimit_above_bgap\textstyle is not set ...
My environment file specifies to import the Chemistry module:
\usemodule[units,chemic]
And the offending
\infty}\right| = AB \quad \text{where
$A=\left|{C_{\rm I} / C_\infty}-1\right|$ and $B= \exp(k)$.}
\stopformula
\stoptext
Yue Wang
On Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 12:28 AM, Hans Hagen pra...@wxs.nl wrote:
Yue Wang wrote:
After upgrading, \chem{CO_2} still gives me:
! Font \*palatino10ptmmmrrm* has
After upgrading, \chem{CO_2} still gives me:
! Font \*palatino10ptmmmrrm* has only 7 fontdimen parameters.
to be read again
\relax
\dosetsubscript ... #1\string #2}{\the #1#2\relax
}#1#2=\dimen 0\relax
\dodosetsubscript
Yue Wang wrote:
After upgrading, \chem{CO_2} still gives me:
! Font \*palatino10ptmmmrrm* has only 7 fontdimen parameters.
sure, you need to wait till mojca has synced both context and luatex
, 2009 at 12:28 AM, Hans Hagen pra...@wxs.nl wrote:
Yue Wang wrote:
After upgrading, \chem{CO_2} still gives me:
! Font \*palatino10ptmmmrrm* has only 7 fontdimen parameters.
sure, you need to wait till mojca has synced both context and luatex
,+SB3,-SB4,Z4,SR4,RZ4][N,H] \stopchemical
bsp; \startchemical \chemical[SPACE,GIVES,SPACE][?] \stopchemical \startchemical \chemical[SIX,B,EB6,R6,SUB4,FIVE,ROT4,B125,+SB3,-SB4,Z4][N] \stopchemical \startchemical \chemical[SPACE,PLUS,SPACE,CHEM][H_2O] \stopchemical }\end{document
}
\Character{text}
\character{text}
\Characters{text}
\characters{text}
\chem{text}{text}{text}
\clip[settings]{text}
\clonefield[name][names][name][names]
\color[text{text}
\column
# \commalistelement
\comment[name][settings]{text}
\comparecolorgroup[name]
\comparepalet[name]
\completecombinedlist[name
(line 69) already loaded
system : module newcml loaded
(/usr/share/texmf/tex/context/base/x-newcml.tex
loading : Context XML Macros (chem ml)
)
xml : loading module ent
(/usr/share/texmf/tex/context/base/xtag-ent.tex
had.
I have not looked into it, but doesn't one of context's chem module
fit this need?
Aditya
___
ntg-context mailing list
ntg-context@ntg.nl
http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
{\let~\low}%
\catcode`\^=\active \uccode`\~=`\^ \uppercase{\let~\high}%
\domolecule }%
\def\domolecule#1{#1\egroup}
I have not looked into it, but doesn't one of context's chem module
fit this need?
\usemodule[chemic]
\let\molecule\chemical
It only gets the size right
one of context's chem module
fit this need?
\usemodule[chemic]
\let\molecule\chemical
It only gets the size right, not the boldnes. But it can be argued
that that is the correct behaviour anyways.
Not so long ago you argued that \alpha-sheet, \beta-helix,
\gamma-rays, ... should
]
\starttext
Hello
\stoptext
I hit the following error:
system : module newcml loaded
(/home/balin/texmf/tex/context/base/x-newcml.tex
loading : Context XML Macros (chem ml)
! Too many }'s.
l.327 \let\stopchemical{}
Can't find anything in '/home/balin/texmf/tex/context/base/x
/context/base/x-newcml.tex
loading : Context XML Macros (chem ml)
! Too many }'s.
l.327 \let\stopchemical{}
?
ah, that line should be
\let\stopchemical\relax
i never tested that since one needs to load the ppchtex module as well
\usemodule[chemic]
in which case
Still struggling to get a poster with Context.
Somehow I am puzzling why almost all my collegue who are accustumed to
write with latex+revtex for chem-math-phys journals then turn to
powerpoint to produce poster and/or presentation, although ConTeXt is
the layout oriented alternative to the well
35 matches
Mail list logo
